Document Analysis (DA) as a Sociotechnical Design Framework for HCI: A Novel Tele-psychiatric Service as a Case Study

  • Bernt Ivar Olsen
  • Peter M. Yellowlees
  • Alberto Odor
  • Niels Windfeld Lund
  • Gunnar Hartvigsen
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 373)

Abstract

We present a novel sociotechnical analysis framework; a document model and a first attempt at utilizing it in an information systems design context. We argue document analysis (DA) to be a holistic framework that encompasses technical, cognitive and social aspects of the system and may act as boundary objects to communicate the system model effectively between stakeholders, designers and engineers.

Keywords

Analysis and design methods Sociotechnical Systems Document- and Information Theory Telepsychiatry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carroll, J.M. (ed.): HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks: Toward A Multidisciplinary Science. Morgan Kaufman, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bygstad, B., Ghinea, G., Brevik, E.: Software development methods and usability: Perspectives from a survey in the software industry in Norway. Interacting with Computers 20, 375–385 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Majid, R.A., Noor, N.L.M., Adnan, W.A.W., Mansor, S.: A survey on HCI considerations in the software development life cycle: from practitioner’s perspective. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interaction Sciences: Information Technology, Culture and Human, pp. 21–24. ACM, Seoul (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borgholm, T., Madsen, K.H.: Cooperative usability practices. Communications of the ACM 42, 91–97 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grudin, J.: Interactive systems: Bridging the gaps between developers and users. Computer 24, 59–69 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goransson, B., Gulliksen, J., Boivie, I.: The usability design process-integrating user-centered systems design in the software development process. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 8, 111–131 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gulliksen, J., Boivie, I., Göransson, B.: Usability professionals—current practices and future development. Interacting with Computers 18, 568–600 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walenstein, A.: Finding Boundary Objects in SE and HCI: An Approach Through Engineering-oriented Design Theories. In: Bridging the Gaps Between Software Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Star, S.L.: Institutional Ecology,Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-1939. Social Studies of Science 19, 387 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    John, B.E., Bass, L., Kazman, R., Chen, E.: Identifying gaps between HCI, software engineering, and design, and boundary objects to bridge them. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., Ye, Y.: Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 63, 482–512 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eriksson, J.: Supporting the cooperative design process of end-user tailoring, Ph.D Dissertation. Department of Interaction and System Design, School of Engineering. Doctor of Philosophy, p. 310. Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden (2008) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Butler, T., Yellowlees, P.: Cost analysis of store-and-forward telepsychiatry as a consultation model for primary care. Telemed. J. E Health 18, 7 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Olsen, B.I., Lund, N.W., Ellingsen, G., Hartvigsen, G.: Document theory for the design of socio-technical systems: A document model as ontology of human expression. Journal of Documentation 68, 100–126 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Olsen, B.I.: Display Scale in a ‘Document’ perspective: size matters. Department of Computer Science, Ph.D, p. 319. University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coiera, E.: Putting the technical back into socio-technical systems research. International Journal of Medical Informatics 76, 98–103 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernt Ivar Olsen
    • 1
  • Peter M. Yellowlees
    • 2
  • Alberto Odor
    • 2
  • Niels Windfeld Lund
    • 3
  • Gunnar Hartvigsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of TromsøNorway
  2. 2.Department of Health InformaticsUC DavisUSA
  3. 3.Documentation- and Media StudiesUniversity of TromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations