Skip to main content

Designing for Culturally Diverse Audiences: Can Automated Attention Analysis Substitute the Eye-Tracking in Website Development?

  • Conference paper
  • 1711 Accesses

Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS,volume 373)

Abstract

Developers use a variety of methods to evaluate user’s reactions to the website. Research in neuroscience and natural vision processing resulted in the development of automated methods which simulate human attention and are able to provide similar results to eye-tracking. However robust evidence is still missing.

This study contributes and expands on this debate. Eye-tracking studies on cultural differences confirmed that users from different cultures have different expectations and preferences. This study answers the question whether cultural differences in web design could be revealed also by automated attention analysis. Websites of the largest beer producers from different countries with different cultural background were analyzed through automated attention analysis tool to determine whether there is a difference in the number of potential areas of interest and their size. The study confirms that automated tools can depict cultural differences and thus provide fast and inexpensive results for initial assessment of website interfaces.

Keywords

  • culture
  • differences
  • webdesign
  • attention analysis
  • automated tool

References

  1. Pressman, R.S., Lowe, D.: Web Engineering. International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering 4, 78–80 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zikmund, W.G., Babin, B.J.: Exploring marketing research. South-Western Pub. (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duchowski, A.T.: A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behavior Research Methods 34, 455–470 (2002)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger, S., Wagner, U., Schwand, C.: Assessing Advertising Effectiveness: The Potential of Goal-Directed Behavior. Psychology and Marketing 29, 411–421 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Mancas, M.: Computational Attention: Modelisation & Application to Audio and Image Processing. TCTS laboratory, Ph.D. thesis. Faculty of Engineering, Mons, Belgium, Mons, Belgium (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harty, J.: Finding usability bugs with automated tests. Communications of the ACM 54, 44–49 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Cyr, D., Head, M., Larios, H.: Colour appeal in website design within and across cultures: A multi-method evaluation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 1–21 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Maheswaran, D., Shavitt, S.: Issues and new directions in global consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology 9, 59–66 (2000)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsieh, H.C., Holland, R., Young, M.: A Theoretical Model for Cross-Cultural Web Design. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 712–721. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Blake, B.F., Shamatta, C., Neuendorf, K.A., Hamilton, R.L.: The cross-national comparison of website feature preferences: A practical approach. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising 5, 145–165 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Usunier, J.C., Roulin, N., Ivens, B.S.: Cultural, National, and Industry-Level Differences in B2B Web Site Design and Content. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 14, 41–88 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Callahan, E.: Cultural similarities and differences in the design of university web sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 239–273 (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Goyal, N., Miner, W., Nawathe, N.: Cultural differences across governmental website design, pp. 149–152. ACM (Year)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ferreira, M.P., Willoughby, D.: Alcohol consumption: the good, the bad, and the indifferent. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 33, 12–20 (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Dimofte, C., Zeugner-Roth, K., Johansson, J.: Local or Global Brand Choice: Do Travelers Really Prefer Global Brands? In: Proceedings of the Global Brand Management Q7 Conference (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mäkelä, P., Gmel, G., Grittner, U., Kuendig, H.É., Kuntsche, S., Bloomfield, K., Room, R.: Drinking patterns and their gender differences in Europe. Alcohol and Alcoholism 41, i8 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. House, R.J.: Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage Publications, Inc. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Black, K.: Business statistics: Contemporary decision making. Wiley (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kincl, T., Novák, M., Charvát, M. (2013). Designing for Culturally Diverse Audiences: Can Automated Attention Analysis Substitute the Eye-Tracking in Website Development?. In: Stephanidis, C. (eds) HCI International 2013 - Posters’ Extended Abstracts. HCI 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 373. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39473-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39473-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39472-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39473-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)