Designing for Culturally Diverse Audiences: Can Automated Attention Analysis Substitute the Eye-Tracking in Website Development?

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 373)


Developers use a variety of methods to evaluate user’s reactions to the website. Research in neuroscience and natural vision processing resulted in the development of automated methods which simulate human attention and are able to provide similar results to eye-tracking. However robust evidence is still missing.

This study contributes and expands on this debate. Eye-tracking studies on cultural differences confirmed that users from different cultures have different expectations and preferences. This study answers the question whether cultural differences in web design could be revealed also by automated attention analysis. Websites of the largest beer producers from different countries with different cultural background were analyzed through automated attention analysis tool to determine whether there is a difference in the number of potential areas of interest and their size. The study confirms that automated tools can depict cultural differences and thus provide fast and inexpensive results for initial assessment of website interfaces.


culture differences webdesign attention analysis automated tool 


  1. 1.
    Pressman, R.S., Lowe, D.: Web Engineering. International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering 4, 78–80 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zikmund, W.G., Babin, B.J.: Exploring marketing research. South-Western Pub. (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duchowski, A.T.: A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behavior Research Methods 34, 455–470 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berger, S., Wagner, U., Schwand, C.: Assessing Advertising Effectiveness: The Potential of Goal-Directed Behavior. Psychology and Marketing 29, 411–421 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mancas, M.: Computational Attention: Modelisation & Application to Audio and Image Processing. TCTS laboratory, Ph.D. thesis. Faculty of Engineering, Mons, Belgium, Mons, Belgium (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harty, J.: Finding usability bugs with automated tests. Communications of the ACM 54, 44–49 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cyr, D., Head, M., Larios, H.: Colour appeal in website design within and across cultures: A multi-method evaluation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 1–21 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maheswaran, D., Shavitt, S.: Issues and new directions in global consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology 9, 59–66 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hsieh, H.C., Holland, R., Young, M.: A Theoretical Model for Cross-Cultural Web Design. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 712–721. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blake, B.F., Shamatta, C., Neuendorf, K.A., Hamilton, R.L.: The cross-national comparison of website feature preferences: A practical approach. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising 5, 145–165 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Usunier, J.C., Roulin, N., Ivens, B.S.: Cultural, National, and Industry-Level Differences in B2B Web Site Design and Content. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 14, 41–88 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Callahan, E.: Cultural similarities and differences in the design of university web sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 239–273 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goyal, N., Miner, W., Nawathe, N.: Cultural differences across governmental website design, pp. 149–152. ACM (Year)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferreira, M.P., Willoughby, D.: Alcohol consumption: the good, the bad, and the indifferent. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 33, 12–20 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dimofte, C., Zeugner-Roth, K., Johansson, J.: Local or Global Brand Choice: Do Travelers Really Prefer Global Brands? In: Proceedings of the Global Brand Management Q7 Conference (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mäkelä, P., Gmel, G., Grittner, U., Kuendig, H.É., Kuntsche, S., Bloomfield, K., Room, R.: Drinking patterns and their gender differences in Europe. Alcohol and Alcoholism 41, i8 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    House, R.J.: Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage Publications, Inc. (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Black, K.: Business statistics: Contemporary decision making. Wiley (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ManagementUniversity of EconomicsJindřichův HradecCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations