Effects of Teamwork versus Group Work on Signal Detection in Cyber Defense Teams
Cyber security is critical for any modern day organization’s operations. Organizational structure and reward policies not conducive for teamwork may be affecting the performance of cyber defense analysts. Past research shows that team interaction could lead to better cyber defense performance. However, the value of team work in the cyber defense context has not been demonstrated using empirical methodologies. To explore this, we conducted a study on the effects of teamwork versus group work (i.e., looking at both the team and individual levels) on signal detection performance of cyber security defense analysts using the synthetic task environment called CyberCog. The results from the preliminary analysis conducted reveal that simply encouraging analysts to work as a team and providing team-level rewards leads to better team performance in cyber defense analysis.
KeywordsCyber Defense Performance Team Cognition Team Performance Synthetic Task Environment CyberCog
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Ponemon, I.: 2012 cost of cyber crime study. Ponemon Institute, United states (2012)Google Scholar
- 2.DAmico, A., Whitley, K., Tesone, D., OBrien, B., Roth, E.: Achieving cyber defense situational awareness: A cognitive task analysis of information assurance analysts. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, pp. 229–233 (2005)Google Scholar
- 3.D’Amico, A., Whitley, K.: The Real Work of Computer Network Defense Analysts. In: VizSEC 2007, pp. 19–37 (2008)Google Scholar
- 4.Boyce, M.W., Duma, K.M., Hettinger, L.J., Malone, T.B., Wilson, D.P., Lockett-Reynolds, J.: Human performance in cybersecurity. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 1115–1119 (2011)Google Scholar
- 5.Liu, P.: Computer-aided Human Centric Cyber Situation Awareness (2009)Google Scholar
- 6.Champion, M., Rajivan, P., Cooke, N.J., Jariwala, S.: Team-based cyber defense analysis. In: 2012 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA), pp. 218–221 (2012)Google Scholar
- 7.Salas, E., Dickinson, T.L., Converse, S.A., Tannenbaum, S.I.: Toward an understanding of team performance and training. Teams their Training and Performance, 3–29 (1992)Google Scholar
- 9.Cooke, N.J., Gorman, J.C., Winner, J.L.: Team cognition. In: Handbook of Applied Cognition, pp. 239–268 (2007)Google Scholar
- 11.Jariwala, S., Champion, M., Rajivan, P., Cooke, N.J.: Influence of team communication and coordination on the performance of teams at the iCTF competition. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 458–462 (2012)Google Scholar
- 12.Cooke, N.J., Rivera, K., Shope, S.M., Caukwell, S.: A synthetic task environment for team cognition research. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 303–308 (1999)Google Scholar
- 13.Rajivan, P.: CyberCog A Synthetic Task Environment for Measuring Cyber Situation Awareness (Master’s Thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) Database (2011)Google Scholar