Advertisement

Supporting Social Deliberative Skills Online: The Effects of Reflective Scaffolding Tools

  • Tom Murray
  • Lynn Stephens
  • Beverly Park Woolf
  • Leah Wing
  • Xiaoxi Xu
  • Natasha Shrikant
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8029)

Abstract

We investigate supporting higher quality deliberations in online contexts by supporting what we call "social deliberative skills," including perspective-taking, meta-dialog, and reflecting on one’s biases. We report on an experiment with college students engaged in online dialogues about controversial topics, using discussion forum software with "reflective tools" designed to support social deliberative skills. We find that these have a significant effect as measured by rubrics designed to asses dialogue quaility and social deliberative behaviors.

Keywords

E-participation and e-democracy Empathic online communities Communication and deliberation skills scaffolding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andriessen, J., Baker, M., Suthers, D. (eds.): Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J.T., Seibert, D.: The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research 30(1), 87–111 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Lund, K., van Amelsvoort, M., Quignard, M.: Rainbow: A framework for analyzing computer-mediated pedagogical debates. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2(2-3), 315–357 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Black, L., Welser, H., Cosley, D., DeGroot, J.: Self-Governance Through Group Discussion in Wikipedia Measuring Deliberation in Online Groups. Small Group Research 42(5), 595–634 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gastil, J., Black, L.W.: Public deliberation as the organizing principle in political communication research. Journal of Public Deliberation 4(1), 3 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Graesser, A., McNamara, D.: Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science 3(2), 371–398 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graesser, A., Vasile, R., Zhiqiang, C.: Question classification schemes. In: Proc. of the Workshop on Question Generation (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herzig, M., Chasin, L.: Fostering dialogue across divides: A nuts and bolts guide from the Public Conversations Project. The Public Conversations Project, Watertown (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holman, P., Devane, T., Cady, S.: The change handbook: The definitive resource on today’s best methods for engaging whole systems. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jordan, T., Andersson, P., Ringnér, H.: The Spectrum of Responses to Complex Societal Issues: Reflections on Seven Years of Empirical Inquiry. Integral Review 9(1) (February 2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    King, P.M., Kitchener, K.S.: Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. Jossey-Bass (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kögler, H.H.: The power of dialog: Critical hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuhn, D.: A Developmental Model of Critical Thinking. Educational Researcher, 16–25 (March 1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuhn, D.: Metacognitive Development. Current Directions in Psychological Science 9(5), 178–181 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lin, X., Sullivan, F.: Computer contexts for supporting metacognitive learning. In: Voogt, J., Knezek, G. (eds.) International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, pp. 281–298. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Linn, M.C.: Designing the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education 22(8), 781–796 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Murray, T., Woolf, B., Wing, L., Shipe, S., Shrikant, N.: A manual coding scheme for social deliberative skills and other attributes related to dialogue quality (in preparation)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murray, T., Woolf, B.P., Xu, X., Shipe, S., Howard, S., Wing, L.: Supporting social deliberative skills in online classroom dialogues: Preliminary results using automated text analysis. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 666–668. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murray, T., Xu, X., Woolf, B.P.: An Exploration of Text Analysis Methods to Identify Social Deliberative Skills (in submission, 2013) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Puntambekar, S., du Boulay, B.: Design and development of MIST—A system to help students develop metacognition. J. Educational Computing Research 16(1), 1–35 (1997)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reiser, B.J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W.A.: BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In: Carver, S.M., Klahr, D. (eds.) Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-Five Years of Progress, Erlbaum, Mahway (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scardamalia, M.: Knowledge-building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In: DiStefano, A., Rudestam, K., Silverman, R. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Distributed Learning, pp. 269–272. Sage Public, Thousand Oaks (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., McLaren, B.M.: Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state-of- the-art. Int. J. of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 5(1), 43–102 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Soller, A., Martínez-Monés, A., Jermann, P., Muehlenbrock, M.: From Mirroring to Guiding: A Review of State of the Art Technology for Supporting Collaborative Learning. I. J. Artificial Intelligence in Education 15(4), 261–290 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spragens, T.A.: Reason and Democracy. Duke University Press, Durham (1990)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stephens, L., Murray, T., Shrikant, N., Wing, L., Xu, X., Woolf, B.P.: An evaluation of online forum features supporting social deliberative skills: Preliminary results (submitted to AIED, 2013) Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stolcke, A., Ries, K., Coccaro, N., Shriberg, J., Bates, R., Jurafsku, D., et al.: Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational Linguistics 26(3), 39–373 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stromer-Galley, J.: Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation 3(1) (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Suthers, D.D.: Empirical studies of the value of conceptually explicit notations in collaborative learning. In: Okada, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Sherborne, T. (eds.) Knowledge Cartography, pp. 1–23. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Suthers, D.D., Connelly, J., Lesgold, A.M., Paolucci, M., Toth, E.E., Toth, J., Weiner, A.: Representational and advisory guidance for students learning scientific inquiry. In: Forbus, K.D., Feltovich, P.J. (eds.) Smart Machines in Education: the Coming Revolution in Educational Technology, pp. 7–35. AAAI Press, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2001)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Toulmin, S.E.: The uses of argument. University Press, Cambridge (1958)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    White, B., Shimoda, T., Frederiksen, J.: Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: computer support for metacognitive development. International J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education 10, 151–1182 (1999)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xu, X., Smith, D., Murray, T., Woolf, B.: Analyzing Conflict Narratives to Predict Settlements in EBay Feedback Dispute Resolution. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Data Mining (DMIN 2012), Las Vegas (July 2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Murray
    • 1
  • Lynn Stephens
    • 1
  • Beverly Park Woolf
    • 1
  • Leah Wing
    • 3
  • Xiaoxi Xu
    • 1
  • Natasha Shrikant
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Commination Dept.University of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  3. 3.Legal Studies Dept.University of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations