Advertisement

User Requirement Analysis of Social Conventions Learning Applications for Non-Natives and Low-Literates

  • Dylan Schouten
  • Nanja Smets
  • Marianne Driessen
  • Marieke Hanekamp
  • Anita H. M. Cremers
  • Mark A. Neerincx
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8019)

Abstract

Learning and acting on social conventions is problematic for low-literates and non-natives, causing problems with societal participation and citizenship. Using the Situated Cognitive Engineering method, requirements for the design of social conventions learning software are derived from demographic information, adult learning frameworks and ICT learning principles. Evaluating a sample of existing Dutch social conventions learning applications on these requirements shows that none of them meet all posed criteria. Finally, Virtual Reality is suggested as a possible future technology improvement.

Keywords

Social conventions adult education ICT learning low-literates non-natives situated cognitive engineering virtual reality mixed reality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Becker, B., Mark, G.: Social Conventions in Collaborative Virtual Environments. In: Proceedings of Collaborative Virtual Environments (CVE 1998) (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    la Belle, T.J.: Formal, nonformal and informal education: a holistic perspective on lifelong learning. International Review of Education 28(2), 159–175 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bijl, R., Verweij, A.: Measuring and monitoring immigrant integration in Europe (2012), www.scp.nl
  4. 4.
    Brown, J.S., Collins, A., Duguid, P.: Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher 18(1), 32–42 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cornelissen, F., Neerincx, M.A., Smets, N.J.J.M., Breebaart, L., Dujarding, P., Wolff, M.: Gamification for astronaut training. In: SpaceOps, Stockholm (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Deursen, A.J.A.M., van Dijk, J.A.G.M.: Trendrapport Computer en Internetgebruik 2011. Een Nederlands en Europees perspectief. Universiteit Twente, Enschede (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dickey, M.D.: Game design and learning: a conjectural analysis of how massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development 55(3), 253–273 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doshi, A.: How gaming could improve information literacy. Computers in Libraries 26(5), 14–17 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    den Draak, M., de Klerk, M.: Oudere migranten (2011), www.scp.nl
  10. 10.
    Driessen, M., van Emmerik, J., Fuhri, K., Nygren-Junkin, L., Spotti, M.: ICT Use in L2 Education for Adult Migrants: A qualitative study in the Netherlands and Sweden, JRC 59774 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ermi, L., Mäyrä, F.: Fundamental Compontents of the Gameplay Experience: Analysing Immersion. In: Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views – Worlds in Play (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Facer, K., Joiner, R., Stanton, D., Reid, J., Hull, R., Kirks, D.: Savannah: Mobile gaming and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20, 399–409 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fengfeng, K.: A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay. Computers & Education 51, 1609–1620 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gijsberts, M., Huijnk, W., Dagevos, J.: Jaarrapport integratie 2011 (2012), www.scp.nl
  15. 15.
    Houtkoop, W., Allen, J., Buisman, M., Fouarge, D., Van der Velden, R.: Kernvaardigheden in Nederland: Resultaten van de Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey (ALL). In: Uitgave Expertisecentrum Beroepsonderwijs (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang, H.M., Rauch, U., Liaw, S.S.: Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers and Education 55, 1171–1182 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Illeris, K.: Characteristics of Adult Learning. International encyclopedia of education 1, 36–41 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keij, I.: Standaarddefinitie allochtonen (2000), http://www.cbs.nl
  19. 19.
    Kiili, K.: Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiental gaming model. Internet and Higher Education 8, 13–24 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Knowles, M.S.: The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Gulf, Houston (1984)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kolb, D.A., Boyatzis, R.E., Mainemelis, C.: Experiental Learning Theory: Previous Research and New Directions. Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking styles 1, 227–247 (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Merriam, S.B.: Adult Education - Adult Learning, Instruction and Program Planning (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mertens, H., van der Zwet, R.: Het versterken van de maatschappelijke participatie van oudere migranten (2009), www.movisie.nl
  24. 24.
    Mezirow, J.: Learning to Think Like an Adult: Core Concepts of Transformation Theory. Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress, 3–33 (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Monahan, T., McArdle, G., Bertolotto, M.: Virtual reality for collaborative e-learning. Computers & Education 50, 1339–1353 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Murray, T.S., Kirsch, I.S., Jenkins, L.: Adult Literacy in OECD Countries: Technical Report on the International Adult Literacy Survey. US Department of Education (1997)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Neerincx, M., Lindenberg, J.: Situated cognitive engineering for complex task environments. In: Schraagen, J., Militello, L., Ormerod, T., Lipshitz, R. (eds.) Naturalistic Decision Making and Macrocognition, pp. 373–390Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nielson, K.B.: Self-study with language learning software in the workplace: what happens? Language Learning & Technology 15(3), 110–129 (2011)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Richards, C.: The design of effective ICT-supported learning activities: exemplary models, changing requirements, and new possibilities. Language Learning and Technology 9(1), 60–79 (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Steehouder en Tijssen, Opbrengsten in beeld; Rapportage Aanvalsplan Laaggeletterdheid 2006-2011. CINOP, Den Bosch (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tough, A.: The Adult’s Learning Projects: A Fresh Approach to Theory and Practice in Adult Learning (1971), http://allentough.com/
  32. 32.
    Warren, S.J., Dondlinger, M.J., Barab, S.A.: A MUVE Towards PBL Writing: Effects of a Digital Learning Environment Designed To Improve Elementary Student Writing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 41(1), 113–140 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dylan Schouten
    • 1
  • Nanja Smets
    • 2
  • Marianne Driessen
    • 3
  • Marieke Hanekamp
    • 3
  • Anita H. M. Cremers
    • 2
  • Mark A. Neerincx
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer ScienceTU DelftNetherlands
  2. 2.TNO SoesterbergSoesterbergNetherlands
  3. 3.CINOPDen BoschNetherlands

Personalised recommendations