Advertisement

Individual Differences in Cognitive Flexibility Predict Poetry Originality

  • Ivonne J. Figueroa
  • Robert J. Youmans
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8019)

Abstract

To be successful at creative tasks, people are often required to think flexibly by selectively switching from one cognitive strategy to a more optimal strategy when presented with changing environmental cues [1]. In this study, we measured differences in students’ cognitive flexibility, and then examined how well flexibility predicted performance on a subsequent creative task, a Haiku poem. Cognitive flexibility was measured using two variables found in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST). Measures of cognitive flexibility predicted the Haiku poem’s originality that students created. The results of this study suggest that cognitive flexibility may play an important role in creative writing and in predicting an individual’s level of creativity. Implications are discussed.

Keywords

Individual differences cognitive flexibility creativity poetry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Scott, W.A.: Cognitive Complexity and Cognitive Flexibility. Sociometry 25, 405–414Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shaw, T.H., Matthews, G., Warm, J.S., Finomore, V.S., Silverman, L., Costa, P.T.: Individual differences in vigilance: Personality, ability and states of stress. Journal of Research in Personality 44, 297–308 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colflesh, G.J., Conway, A.R.: Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 699–703 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Unsworth, N., McMillan, B.D., Brewer, G.A., Spillers, G.J.: Everyday attention failures: An individual differences investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 38, 1765–1772 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeYoung, C.G., Flanders, J.L., Peterson, J.B.: Cognitive Abilities Involved in Insight Problem Solving: An Individual Differences Model. Creativity Research Journal 20, 278–290 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amabile, T.M.: Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48, 393 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ericsson, K.A., Krampe, R.T.: Institute of Cognitive ScienceGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herman, A., Reiter-Palmon, R.: The effect of regulatory focus on idea generation and idea evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 5, 13–20 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Amabile, T.M.: The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45, 357 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ward, T.B., Patterson, M.J., Sifonis, C.M.: The role of specificity and abstraction in creative idea generation. Creativity Research Journal 16, 1–9 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Dreu, C.K.W., Baas, M., Nijstad, B.A.: Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94, 739–756 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dennis, J.P., Vander Wal, J.S.: The Cognitive Flexibility Inventory: Instrument Development and Estimates of Reliability and Validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research 34, 241–253 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Youmans, R., Figueroa, I., Kramarova, O.: Reactive Task-Set Switching Ability, Not Working Memory Capacity, Predicts Change Blindness Sensitivity. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 55, pp. 914–918Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adi-Japha, E., Berberich-Artzi, J., Libnawi, A.: Cognitive flexibility in drawings of bilingual children. Child Development 81, 1356–1366 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spiro, R., Feltovich, P.J.: Jacobson, Mi.J., Coulson, R.L.: Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Presented at theGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lowrey, W., Kim, K.S.: Online News Media and Advanced Learning: A Test of Cognitive Flexibility Theory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 53, 547–566 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Figueroa, I.J., Youmans, R.J.: Developing an Easy-to-Administer, Objective, and Valid Assessment of Cognitive Flexibility. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 944–948 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heaton, R.K., Chelune, G.J., Talley, J.L.: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test manual: Revised and expanded. In: Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, Florida (1993)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barceló, F., Knight, R.T.: Both random and perseverative errors underlie WCST deficits in prefrontal patients. Neuropsycholgia 40, 349–356 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Masley, S., Roetzheim, R., Gualtieri, T.: Aerobic Exercise Enhances Cognitive Flexibility. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings 16, 186–193 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roskes, M., De Dreu, C.K.W., Nijstad, B.A.: Necessity is the mother of invention: Avoidance motivation stimulates creativity through cognitive effort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103, 242–256 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivonne J. Figueroa
    • 1
  • Robert J. Youmans
    • 1
  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations