Conceptual and Experiential Representations of Tempo: Effects on Expressive Performance Comparisons

  • Elaine Chew
  • Clifton Callender
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7937)

Abstract

Tempo is an important parameter that is varied and analysed in music performance. We argue that it is important to consider both tempo and log(tempo) in score time as well as performance time in the analysis of performances; performance time mirrors listeners’ real time experience, and log(tempo) gauges proportional tempo changes. As demonstration, we revisit Chew’s (2012) score time tempo analysis of performances of Beethoven’s “Moonlight” Sonata, and generate new results using log(tempo) and performance time. We show that extreme differences in score time tempo are ameliorated by considering log(tempo) and performance time, that the performers employed similar log(tempo) ranges and phrase lengths (in performance time), and that long score time phrases do not necessarily map to lengthy performance time spans due to speedier phrase traversal times. The results suggest that log(tempo) range and maximum performance time phrase length may act as perceptual constraints on the shaping of a performance.

Keywords

music analysis representation expressive performance tempo score time performance time 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Palmer, C., Hutchins, S.: What is Musical Prosody? Psych. Learning Motivation 46, 245–278 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Repp, J.A.: Diversity and Commonality in Music Performance: An Analysis of Timing Microstructure in Schumann’s “Traumerei”. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92(5), 2546–2568 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Timmers, J.A.: Predicting the Similarity Between Expressive Performances of Music from Measurements of Tempo and Dynamics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117(1), 391–399 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bilmes, J.A.: Timing is of the Essence: Perceptual and Computational Techniques for Representing, Learning, and Reproducing Expressive Timing in Percussive Rhythm. Masters thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dixon, S., Goebl, W., Widmer, G.: The Performance Worm: Real Time Visualisation of Expression Based on Lagner’s Tempo-Loudness Animation. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pp. 361–364 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grosche, P., Müller, M.: Tempogram Toolbox: Matlab Implementations for Tempo and Pulse Analysis of Music Recordings. In: Late Breaking Results of the International Conference of the Society for Music Information Retrieval (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith, L.M., Honing, H.: Time-Frequency Representation of Musical Rhythm by Continuous Wavelets. Journal of Mathematics and Music 2(2), 81–97 (2008)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guerino, M.: The Topos of Music: Geometric Logic of Concepts, Theory, and Performance. Springer, Basel (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Epstein, D.: Shaping Time: Music, the Brain, and Performance. Schirmer Books, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Repp, B.: On Determining the Basic Tempo of an Expressive Music Performance. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR-114, 159–166. New Haven (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chew, E.: About Time: Strategies of Performance Revealed in Graphs. In: Greher, G.R., Ruthmann, S.A. (eds.) A Tribute to Jeanne Bamberger, Visions of Research in Music Education, vol. 20(1) (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barenboim, D.: Piano Sonata No. 14 in C-Sharp Minor, Op. 27 No. 2, “Moonlight”: I. Adagio sostenuto. In: Beethoven: Moonlight, Pathétique & Appassionata Sonatas. Deutsche Grammophon GmbH, Hamburg (1987)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pollini, M.: Piano Sonata No. 14 in C-Sharp Minor, Op. 27, No. 2, “Moonlight”: I. Adagio sostenuto. In: Beethoven Piano Sonatas: Moonlight & Pastorale. Deutsche Grammophon GmbH, Hamburg (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schnabel, A.: Piano Sonata No. 14 In C-Sharp Minor, Op. 27 No. 2, “Moonlight”: I. Adagio Sostenuto. In: Artur Schnabel, EMI Records Ltd. (2009) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bamberger, J.: What is Time?: A Hearing is a Performance, a Performance is a Hearing. Guest lecture, Andrew and Erna Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robertson, A.: Decoding Tempo and Timing Variations in Music Recordings from Beat Annotations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of the Society of Music Information Retrieval, pp. 475–480 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stowell, D., Chew, E.: Bayesian MAP Estimation of Piecewise Arcs in Tempo Time-series. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Lerdahl, F.: Tonal Pitch Space. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chew, E.: Towards a Mathematical Model of Tonality. PhD Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elaine Chew
    • 1
  • Clifton Callender
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Digital MusicQueen Mary University of LondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.College of MusicFlorida State UniversityUnited States of America

Personalised recommendations