Advertisement

Understanding the Influence of Viewpoint and Image Geometry in Linear Perspective Paintings to Enhance Embodied Interaction

  • Franziska Hannß
  • Rainer Groh
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8028)

Abstract

Museums are attracted by new technologies, for example tracking systems and multitouch displays. They try to include them into their concepts, to expand the access to the artifacts. The intention of this work appears out of the image geometry of a linear perspective painting. We assume that the position of the perspective painting on the wall should depend on the observer’s viewpoint. To prove this hypothesis we undertook an experiment with 20 participants and four perspective paintings. We detected a relevant connection between observer and the image geometry of the painting. Accordingly the observer, the room in front of the painting and the image itself are related together. Therefor this relation of the parameters is part of the research field of embodied interaction.

Keywords

body movement embodied interaction image geometry perspective paintings interactive environments 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Antle, A.N., Marshall, P., Hoven, E.: Workshop on Embodied Interaction: Theory and Practice in HCI. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2011), pp. 5–8. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hornecker, E.: The Role of Physicality in Tangible and Embodied Interactions. Interactions 18(2), 19–23 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kortbek, K.J., Grønbæk, K.: Communicating Art through Interactive Technology: New Approaches for Interaction Design in Art Museums. In: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Building Bridges (NordiCHI 2008), pp. 229–238. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fogtmann, M.H., Fritsch, J., Kortbek, K.J.: Kinesthetic Interaction – Revealing the Bodily Potential in Interaction Design. In: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat (OzCHI 2008), pp. 89–96. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schieck, A.F.G., Moutinho, A.M.: ArCHI: Engaging with Museum Objects Spatially Through Whole Body Movement. In: Proceeding of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference (MindTrek 2012), pp. 39–45. ACM, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    International Council of Museums: Statutes, Vienna (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Field, J.V.: The invention of infinity: Mathematics and Art in the Renaissance. Oxford University Press Inc., New York (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    da Vignola, G.B.: Two rules of practical perspective, Bologna (1583)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Veltman, K.H.: Computers and Renaissance Perspective. Centro Ricerche Leonardiane, Brescia (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Calter, P.: Squaring the Circle: Geometry in Art & Architecture. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arnheim, R.: The Power of the Center: A Study of Composition in the Visual Arts. University of California Press, Berkeley (1982)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ishii, H.: Tangible Bilts: Beyond Pixels. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI 2008), pp. xv–xxv. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franziska Hannß
    • 1
  • Rainer Groh
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Media Design, Faculty of Computer ScienceTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations