Internet Anxiety: Myth or Reality?

  • Santosh Kumar Kalwar
  • Kari Heikkinen
  • Jari Porras
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8008)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to determine if Internet anxiety is a myth or reality using literature, questionnaires, and analysis of the collected data. Results showed that the Internet anxiety phenomenon is mostly reality. By placing strong emphasis on the existent Internet anxiety phenomenon, the HCI community could constructively build effective tools and techniques to mitigate users’ anxiety.

Keywords

Internet anxiety concept qualitative myth reality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kirschner, P.A., Karpinski, A.C.: Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior 26(6), 1237–1245 (2010) ISSN 0747-5632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rose, L.D.: iDisorder: Understanding Our Obsession with Technology and Overcoming Its Hold on Us. Palgrave Macmillan (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Joiner, R., Gavin, J., Brosnan, M., Cromby, J., Gegory, H., Guiller, J., Maras, P., Moon, A.: Gender, Internet experience, Internet identification and Internet anxiety: a ten year follow-up. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15(7), 370–372 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Presno, C.: Taking the byte out of internet anxiety: Instructional techniques that reduce computer/internet anxiety in the classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research 18(2), 147–161 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalwar, S.K.: Comparison of Human Anxiety Based on Different Cultural Backgrounds. CyberPsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking 13(4), 443–446 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Ryan, T., Xenos, S.: Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior 27(5), 1658–1664 (2011) ISSN 0747-5632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jackson, L.A., Ervin, K.S., Gardner, P.D., Schmitt, N.: Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching. Sex Roles 44(5), 363–379 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Carr, N.: The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. W. W. Norton & Company (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grohol, J.M.: Too much time online: Internet addiction or healthy social interactions. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2(5), 395–401 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Griffiths, M.D.: Internet addiction: Does it really exist? In: Gackenbach, J. (ed.) Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications. Academic Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Widyanto, L., Griffiths, M.D., Brunsden, V., Mcmurran, M.: The psychometric properties of the Internet related problem scale: a pilot study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 6(2), 205–213 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kalwar, S.K., Heikkinen, K., Porras, J.: Conceptual Framework for Assessing Human Anxiety on the Internet. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 46, 4907–4917 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thatcher, J.B., Loughry, M.L., Lim, J., McKnight, D.H.: Internet anxiety: An empirical study of the effects of personality, beliefs, and social support. In: Proceedings of Mathematical Lecture Note Series, pp. 353–363 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peshkin, A.: Understanding complexity: A gift of qualitative inquiry. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 19(4), 416–424 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kalwar, S.K., Heikkinen, K.: Study of human anxiety on the internet. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI International 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5610, pp. 69–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brosnan, M., Joiner, R., Gavin, J., Crook, C., Maras, P., Guiller, J., Scott, A.J.: The Impact of Pathological Levels of Internet-Related Anxiety on Internet Usage. Journal of Educational Computing Research 46(4), 341–356 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Barak, A.: Internet and well-being. In: Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (ed.) Technology and Well-being, pp. 34–76. Cambridge University Press (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laghi, F., Schneider, B.H., Vitoroulis, I., Coplan, R.J., Baiocco, R., Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Hudek, N., Koszycki, D., Miller, S., Flament, M.: Knowing when not to use the Internet: Shyness and adolescents’ on-line and off-line interactions with friends. Computers in Human Behavior 29(1), 51–57 (2013) ISSN 0747-5632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stepanikova, I., Nie, N.H., Xiaobin, H.: Time on the Internet at home, loneliness, and life satisfaction: Evidence from panel time-diary data. Computers in Human Behavior 26(3) (May 2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Santosh Kumar Kalwar
    • 1
  • Kari Heikkinen
    • 1
  • Jari Porras
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Software Engineering and Information ManagementLappeenranta University of TechnologyLappeenrantaFinland

Personalised recommendations