Advertisement

A New Real-Time Visual SLAM Algorithm Based on the Improved FAST Features

  • Liang Wang
  • Rong Liu
  • Chao Liang
  • Fuqing Duan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8008)

Abstract

The visual SLAM is less dependent on hardware, so it attracts growing interests. However, the visual SLAM, especially the Extend Kalman Filter-based monocular SLAM is computational expensive, and is hard to fulfill real-time process. In this paper, we propose an algorithm, which uses the binary robust independent elementary Features descriptor to describe the features from accelerated segment test feature aiming at improving feature points extraction and matching, and combines with the 1-point random sample consensus strategy to speedup the EKF-based visual SLAM. The proposed algorithm can improve the robustness of the EKF-based visual SLAM and make it operate in real-time. Experimental results validate the proposed algorithm.

Keywords

Feature Point Extend Kalman Filter Feature Point Extraction From Accelerate Segment Test Binary Robust Independent Elementary Feature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Davison, A.J.: Real-time simultaneous localisation and mapping with a single camera. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, Nice (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davison, A.J., Molton, N.D., Reid, I.D., Stasse, O.: MonoSLAM: Real-time single camera SLAM. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 29(6), 1052–1067 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Civera, J., Davison, A.J., Montiel, J.M.: Inverse depth parametrization for monocular SLAM. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 24(5), 932–945 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klein, G., Murray, D.W.: Parallel tracking and mapping for small AR workspaces. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 1–10 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strasdat, H., Montiel, J.M., Davison, A.J.: Visual SLAM: Why Filter? Image and Vision Computing 30(2), 65–77 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hartley, R., Zisserman, A.: Multiple view geometry in computer vision, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Civera, J., Grasa, O.G., Davison, A.J., Montiel, J.M.: 1-Point RANSAC for EKF filtering: application to real-time structure from motion and visual odometry. Journal of Field Robotics 27(5), 609–631 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lowe, D.G.: Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Vision, Kerkyra, Herbert Bay (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rosten, E., Drummond, T.: Machine learning for high-speed corner detection. In: Leonardis, A., Bischof, H., Pinz, A. (eds.) ECCV 2006, Part I. LNCS, vol. 3951, pp. 430–443. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Calonder, M., Lepetit, V., Strecha, C., Fua, P.: BRIEF: Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features. In: Daniilidis, K., Maragos, P., Paragios, N. (eds.) ECCV 2010, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 6314, pp. 778–792. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liang Wang
    • 1
  • Rong Liu
    • 2
  • Chao Liang
    • 1
  • Fuqing Duan
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Electronic Information and Control EngineeringBeijing University of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Base DepartmentBeijing Institute of Fashion TechnologyBeijingChina
  3. 3.College of Information Science and TechnologyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations