Skip to main content

Decision Making in the Environment of Heterogeneous Uncertainty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 502))

Abstract

The environment of heterogeneous uncertainty is characterized by the presence of variables in multiple uncertainty formalisms. This paper provides an overview of decision models under several uncertainty frameworks including probability theory, Dempster-Shafer belief function theory and possibility theory. It explores the challenges in pulling them together for decision making. We show that the information of sequence of variable resolution, which was often neglected, actually plays a key role in decision making under heterogeneous uncertainty. A novel approach, based on the well-known folding-back principle, to find the certainty equivalent of acts under heterogeneous uncertainty is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allais, M.: Le comportement de l’homme rationel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axioms de l’ecole americaine. Econometrica 21, 503–546 (1953)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Arrow, K.J., Hurwicz, L.: An optimality criterion for decision making under ignorance. In: Arrow, K.J., Hurwicz, L. (eds.) Studies in Resource Allocation Processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Birnbaum, A.: On the foundation of statistical inference. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 57(298), 269–306 (1962)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cox, D.R., Hinkley, D.V.: Theoretical Statistics. Chapman and Hall, London (1974)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dempster, A.: Upper and lower probability induced by multivalued mapping. Ann. Probab. 38, 325–339 (1967)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dempster, A.: A generalization of Bayesian inference. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 30, 205–247 (1968) with discussion

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois, D., Godo, L., Prade, H., Zapico, A.: Making decision in a qualitative setting: from decision under uncertaity to case-based decision. In: Cohn, A., Schubert, L., Shapiro, S. (eds.) Sixth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR98), pp. 594–605. Morgan Kaufmann, California (CA) (6 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois, D., Nguyen, T.H., Prade, H.: Possibility theory, probability and fuzzy sets. In: Dubois, D., Prade, H. (eds.) Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets, pp. 344–438. Kluwer Academic, Boston (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellsberg, D.: Risk, ambiguity and the Savage’s axioms. Q. J. Econ. 75(4), 643–669 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Giang, P.H.: A new axiomatization for likelihood gambles. In: Dechter, R., Richardson, T.S. (eds.) Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference, pp. 192–199. AUAI Press, (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Giang, P.H.: Dynamic consistency and decision making under vacuous belief. In: Cozman, F.G., Pfeffer, A. (eds.) Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the 27nd Conference (UAI-2011), pp. 230–237. AUAI Press, (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Giang, P.H.: Decision with Dempster-Shafer belief functions: decision under ignorance and sequential consistency. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 53(1), 38–53 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Giang, P.H., Shenoy, P.P.: Two axiomatic approaches to decision making using possibility theory. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 162(2), 450–467 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Giang, P.H., Shenoy, P.P.: A decision theory for partially consonant belief functions. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 52(3), 375–394 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Giang, P.H., Shenoy, P.P.: A decision theory for partially consonant belief functions. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 52, 375–394 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Gilboa, I.: Theory of Decision Under Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Glimcher, P.W.: Foundations of Neuroeconomic Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Halpern, J.Y.: Reasoning About Uncertainty. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Jaffray, J.-Y.: Linear utility theory for belief functions. Oper. Res. Lett. 8, 107–112 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Jaffray, J.-Y., Wakker, P.: Decision making with belief functions: compatibility and incompatibility with the sure-thing principle. J. Risk Uncertainty 8(3), 255–271 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen, N.E.: An introduction to Bernoullian utility theory I: utility functions. Swed. J. Econ. 69, 163–183 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Savage, L.J.: The Foundations of Statistics, 2nd edn. Dover, New York (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Smets, P.: The transferable belief model for quantified belief representation. In: Gabbay, D.M., Smets, P. (eds.) Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncetainty Management System, vol. 1, pp. 267–301. Kluwer, Doordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smets, P., Kennes, R.: The transferable belief model. Artif. Intell. 66(2), 191–234 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Wakker, P.P.: Prospect Theory for Risk and Ambiguity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Walley, P.: Belief function representation of statistical evidence. Ann. Stat. 15(4), 1439–1465 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Walley, P.: Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall, London (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Yager, R.: Decision making under Dempster-Shafer uncertainties. Int. J. Gen Syst 20, 223–245 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy set as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1, 3–28 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phan H. Giang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giang, P.H. (2014). Decision Making in the Environment of Heterogeneous Uncertainty. In: Guo, P., Pedrycz, W. (eds) Human-Centric Decision-Making Models for Social Sciences. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 502. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39307-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39307-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39306-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39307-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics