Advertisement

Usability of County Election Websites

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8015)

Abstract

How well do counties answer voters’ questions about upcoming elections? Other studies have reviewed state election department websites [1, 2], but voters vote at the county or town level. How do they get their questions answered? Assuming that one source of election information might be local —the website for the county clerk or registrar—we cataloged 147 county websites, and then conducted a large-scale, distributed usability test with 41 voters from across the U.S. using their own county’s website. We sought to learn about what local election jurisdictions were offering for content, what terminology they used to describe it, and how useful and usable that content was to voters —just in time for the 2012 U.S. Presidential election.

Keywords

Usability methods and tools voting elections websites 

References

  1. 1.
    Pew Election Initiatives: Being Online is Not Enough: State Elections Web Sites (2008), http://www.pewtrusts.org/our_work_report_detail.aspx?id=45170
  2. 2.
    Pew Election Initiatives: Being Online Is Still Not Enough (2011), http://www.pewstates.org/research/reports/being-online-is-still-not-enough-85899376525
  3. 3.
    Rubin, J., Chisnell, D.E.: Handbook of Usability Testing, 2nd edn. Wiley, Indianapolis (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hale, K., Mosberger, K.: E-Government As A Tool for Reform In Election Administration. In: Election Reform Agenda Conference (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang, Z.: E-Government Practices at Local Levels: An Analysis of U.S. Counties’ Websites. Issues in Information Systems Vii(2) (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations