Advertisement

Addressing Human Computer Interaction Issues of Electronic Health Record in Clinical Encounters

  • Martina A. Clarke
  • Linsey M. Steege
  • Joi L. Moore
  • Jeffery L. Belden
  • Richelle J. Koopman
  • Min Soon Kim
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8013)

Background

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) are known to reduce medical errors and store comprehensive patient information, and they also impact the physician-patient interaction during clinical encounters. This study reviewed the literature to (1) identify the most common challenges to patient-physician relations while using an EHR during a clinical visit, (2) discuss limitations of the research methodologies employed, and (3) suggest future research directions related to addressing human computer interaction issues when physicians use an EHR in clinical encounters.

Keywords

Cognitive Load Electronic Health Record Clinical Encounter Clinical Information System Cognitive Load Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hsu, J., et al.: Health information technology and physician-patient interactions: impact of computers on communication during outpatient primary care visits. J Am Med. Inform. Assoc. 12(4), 474–480 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alsos, O.A., Dabelow, B., Faxvaag, A.: Doctors’ concerns of PDAs in the ward round situation. Lessons from a formative simulation study. Methods Inf. Med. 50(2), 190–200 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ash, J.S., Berg, M., Coiera, E.: Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med. Inform. Assoc. 11(2), 104–112 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kushniruk, A.W., et al.: Technology induced error and usability: the relationship between usability problems and prescription errors when using a handheld application. Int. J. Med. Inform. 74(7-8), 519–526 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rose, A.F., et al.: Using qualitative studies to improve the usability of an EMR. J. Biomed. Inform. 38(1), 51–60 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Vleck, T.T., et al.: Content and structure of clinical problem lists: a corpus analysis. In: AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc., pp. 753–757 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koopman, R.J., et al.: A diabetes dashboard and physician efficiency and accuracy in accessing data needed for high-quality diabetes care. Ann Fam. Med. 9(5), 398–405 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith, M., Dang, D., Lee, J.: E-prescribing: clinical implications for patients with diabetes. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 3(5), 1215–1218 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koppel, R., et al.: Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA, 2005 293(10), 1197–1203 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Merrienboer, J.J., Ayres, P.: Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development 53(3), 5–13 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist 38(1), 43–52 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Poon, E.G., et al.: “I wish I had seen this test result earlier!”: Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. Arch Intern. Med. 164(20), 2223–2228 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wipfli, R., Lovis, C.: Alerts in clinical information systems: building frameworks and prototypes. Stud. Health. Technol. 155, 163–169 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Margalit, R.S., et al.: Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Educ. Couns. 61(1), 134–141 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Makoul, G., Curry, R.H., Tang, P.C.: The use of electronic medical records: communication patterns in outpatient encounters. J. Am Med. Inform. Assoc. 8(6), 610–615 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Penrod, L.E., Gadd, C.S.: Attitudes of academic-based and community-based physicians regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. In: Proc AMIA Symp., pp. 528–532 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosenstand, J., Waldorff, F.B.: Views of GPs and patients on use of computers during consultation. Ugeskr Laeger 170(17), 1449–1453 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garg, A.X., et al.: Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 293(10), 1223–1238 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goh, J.M., Gao, G., Agarwal, R.: Evolving Work Routines: Adaptive Routinization of Information Technology in Healthcare. Information Systems Research 22(3), 565–585 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kawamoto, K., et al.: Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 330(7494), 765 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krall, M.A., Sittig, D.F.: Clinician’s assessments of outpatient electronic medical record alert and reminder usability and usefulness requirements. In: Proc. AMIA Symp., pp. 400–404 (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Linder, J.A., et al.: Barriers to electronic health record use during patient visits. In: AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc., pp. 499–503 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tamblyn, R., et al.: The development and evaluation of an integrated electronic prescribing and drug management system for primary care. J. Am Med. Inform. Assoc. 13(2), 148–159 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang, S.J., et al.: End of visit: design considerations for an ambulatory order entry module. In: Proc. AMIA Symp., pp. 864–868 (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maguire, M.: Methods to support human-centred design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 55(4), 587–634 (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Belden, J., Grayson, R., Barnes, J.: Defining and testing EMR usability: Principles and proposed methods of EMR usability evaluation and rating. Chicago (IL): Healthcare Information and Management Systems (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khajouei, R., Jaspers, M.W.: CPOE system design aspects and their qualitative effect on usability. Stud. Health. Technol. Inform. 136, 309–314 (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Clarke, M., et al.: Creating a More Readable Electronic Health Record (EHR) Model: Analysis of Primary Care Physicians’ Information Needs. In: AMIA 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Phansalkar, S., et al.: A review of human factors principles for the design and implementation of medication safety alerts in clinical information systems. J. Am Med. Inform. Assoc. 17(5), 493–501 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Arar, N.H., Wang, C.P., Pugh, J.A.: Self-care communication during medical encounters: implications for future electronic medical records. Perspect Health Inf. Manag. 3, 3 (2006)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Als, A.B.: The desk-top computer as a magic box: patterns of behaviour connected with the desk-top computer; GPs’ and patients’ perceptions. Fam. Pract. 14(1), 17–23 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ridsdale, L., Hudd, S.: Computers in the consultation: the patient’s view. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 44(385), 367–369 (1994)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Houston, T.K., et al.: Patient perceptions of physician use of handheld computers. In: AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc., pp. 299–303 (2003)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Berner, E.S., et al.: Impact of patient feedback on residents’ handheld computer use: a multi-site study. Stud. Health. Technol. Inform. 107(pt 1), 582–586 (2004)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Strayer, S.M., et al.: Patient attitudes toward physician use of tablet computers in the exam room. Fam. Med. 42(9), 643–647 (2010)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    French, J.R.P.: Experiments in field settings. Research methods in the behavioral sciences, pp. 98–135 (1953)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Arar, N.H., et al.: Communicating about medications during primary care outpatient visits: the role of electronic medical records. Inform. Prim. Care 13(1), 13–22 (2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ventres, W., et al.: Physicians, patients, and the electronic health record: An ethnographic analysis. Annals of Family Medicine 4(2), 124–131 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Booth, N., Robinson, P., Kohannejad, J.: Identification of high-quality consultation practice in primary care: The effects of computer use on doctor-patient rapport. Informatics in Primary Care 12(2), 75–83 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martina A. Clarke
    • 1
  • Linsey M. Steege
    • 1
    • 2
  • Joi L. Moore
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jeffery L. Belden
    • 4
  • Richelle J. Koopman
    • 4
  • Min Soon Kim
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.University of Missouri Informatics InstituteUniversity of MissouriUSA
  2. 2.School of NursingUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  3. 3.School of Information Science and Learning TechnologyUniversity of MissouriUSA
  4. 4.Department of Family and Community MedicineUniversity of MissouriUSA
  5. 5.Department of Health Management and InformaticsUniversity of MissouriUSA

Personalised recommendations