Advertisement

Reframed Contexts: Design Thinking for Agile User Experience Design

  • Sisira Adikari
  • Craig McDonald
  • John Campbell
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8012)

Abstract

The effectiveness of user experience design is dependent on many factors including complete and accurate contextual information, design approaches, and methods followed. The recent HCI literature clearly shows that there is a growing research interest on integration of User Experience (UX) design and agile software development. A framework based on design thinking is proposed that enhances the current user experience design by integration of three design approaches - design thinking, designing for user experience and agile software development. These three different design approaches of the framework complement each other to benefit effective derivation of contextual requirements that include functionality of the system as well as aspects of total user experience based on the shared understanding gained from stakeholders in the context. Implications of each design approach on stakeholders and the context are discussed in detail to show the significance and value of the proposed framework on the whole design and design process. It is expected that the proposed framework is capable of enhancing the design quality and user experience of products, systems, and services created through agile software development approaches.

Keywords

user experience agile software development human-centered design human-computer interaction design thinking 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Preece, J.: Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuniavsky, M.: Smart Things: Ubiquitous Computing User Experience Design. Morgan Kaufmann (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chamberlain, S., Sharp, H., Maiden, N.A.M.: Towards a framework for integrating Agile development and usercentred design. In: Abrahamsson, P., Marchesi, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4044, pp. 143–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Najafi, M., Toyoshiba, L.: Two Case Studies of User Experience Design and Agile Development. In: AGILE 2008 Conference (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K., Baker, L.: An Agile Customer-Centered Method: Rapid Contextual Design. In: Zannier, C., Erdogmus, H., Lindstrom, L. (eds.) XP/Agile Universe 2004. LNCS, vol. 3134, pp. 50–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kautz, K.: Customer and User Involvement in Agile Software Development. In: Abrahamsson, P., Marchesi, M., Maurer, F. (eds.) XP 2009. LNBIP, vol. 31, pp. 168–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dorst, D., Stewart, S., Staudinger, I., Paton, B., Dong, D.: Introduction. In: DTRS8 Proceedings of the 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lindberg, T., Gumienny, R., Jobst, B., Meinel, C.: Is There a Need for a Design Thinking Process? In: DTRS8 Proceedings of the 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cross, N., Dorst, K., Roozenburg, N.: Preface to Research in Design Thinking. In: Research in Design Thinking (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cross, N.: Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. Berg Publishers, Oxford (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dunne, D., Martin, R.: Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education 5, 512–523 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brown, T.: Design Thinking. In: Harvard Business Review, pp. 85–92 (June 2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McKay, J., Marshall, P., Heath, G.: An exploration of the concept of design in information systems. In: Hart, D., Gregor, S. (eds.) Information Systems Foundation: The Role of Design Science, D, ANU ePress (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    IEEE610.12-1990: IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology. IEEE (1990)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Benyon, D.: Designing Interactive Systems. Pearson (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ralph, P., Wand, Y.: A proposal for a formal definition of the design concept. In: Lyytinen, K., Loucopoulos, P., Mylopoulos, J., Robinson, B. (eds.) Design Requirements Workshop. LNBIP, vol. 14, pp. 103–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eris, O.: Insisting on Truth at the Expense of Conceptualization: Can Engineering Portfolios Help? International Journal of Engineering Education 22, 551–559 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McDonagh, D., Denton, H.: Design and Emotion. Journal of Engineering Design 20, 433–435 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Merlijn, K., Froukje, S.V.: A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user’s life. Journal of Engineering Design 20, 437–448 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Badke Schaub, P.G., Roozenburg, N.F.M., Cardoso, C.: Design thinking: a paradigm on its way from dilution to meaninglessness? In: Proceedings of the 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium, DTRS8 (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brown, T.: Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transform Organizations and Inspires Innovation. HarperCollins, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schon, D.A.: The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kolko, J.: Abductive Thinking and Sensemaking: The Drivers of Design Synthesis. Design Issues 26, 15–28 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Adikari, S., McDonald, C., Campbell, J.: A Design Science Framework for Designing and Assessing User Experience. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction, Part I, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6761, pp. 25–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Adikari, S., McDonald, C., Campbell, J.: Little Design Up-Front: A Design Science Approach to Integrating Usability into Agile Requirements Engineering. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI International 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5610, pp. 549–558. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brown, T.: Innovation through Design Thinking, Boston, Massachuttes, USA. MIT World: Dean’s Innovative Leader Series, http://mitworld.mit.edu/video/357/ (accessed March 10, 2013)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sisira Adikari
    • 1
  • Craig McDonald
    • 1
  • John Campbell
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information Systems and AccountingUniversity of CanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations