Skip to main content

Review of Critical Success Factors Related to People in Software Process Improvement

  • Conference paper
Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2013)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 364))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Information systems are designed, constructed, and used by people, using a set of defined processes previously deployed, as a result of software process improvement initiative. Software process improvement is not a purely technical task, but a complex psycho-socio-technical process. This paper presents a systematic review to identify the categories most used in literature to classify software process improvement success factors and the critical success factors related to people. We found several studies related to critical success factors, but only 10 of them proposed a critical success factors classification. The quantitative data from a systematic review were analyzed using descriptive statistics. As a result the following common categories are identified: organization, people and process. The critical success factors related to people are presented in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T., Moinul, A., Kian Cheng, C., Bayu, R., Feldt, R.: Evaluation and Measurement of Software Process Improvement-A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 38(2), 398–424 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Damaševičius, R.: On The Human, Organizational, and Technical Aspects of Software Development and Analysis. Information Systems Development, pp. 11–19 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mohd, N., Shamsul, S.: Addressing a critical success factor for software projects: A multi-round Delphi study of TSP. International Journal of the Physical Sciences 6(5), 1213–1232 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: The influence of SPI on business success in software SMEs: An empirical study. Journal of Systems and Software 85(10), 2356–2367 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Niazi, M., Babar, M.: Motivators of Software Process Improvement: An Analysis of Vietnamese Practitioners’ Views. In: 11th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE), Keele University, UK, April 2-3 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hall, T., Rainer, A., Baddoo, N.: Implementing Software Process Improvement: An Empirical Study. Software Process Improvement and Practice 7, 3–15 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pitterman, B.: Telcordia technologies: the journey to high maturity. IEEE Software 17(4), 89–96 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nasir Mohd, H., Ahmad, R., Hassan, N.: Resistance factors in the implementation of software process improvement project. Journal of Computer Science 4(3), 211–219 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Montoni, M., et al.: Taba Workstation: Supporting Software Process Deployment Based on CMMI and MR-MPS.BR. In: Münch, J., Vierimaa, M. (eds.) PROFES 2006. LNCS, vol. 4034, pp. 249–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. McDermid, J., Bennet, K.: Software Engineering research: A critical appraisal. IEEE Proceedings on Software Engineering 146(4), 179–186 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall, T., Wilson, D.: Views of software quality: a field report. IEEE Proceedings on Software Engineering 144(2), 111–118 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hall, T., Wilson, D.: Perceptions of software quality: a pilot study. Software Quality Journal 7(1), 67–75 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kitchenham, B.: Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Biolchini, J., Mian, P., Natali, A., Travassos, G.: Systematic review in software engineering. Technical report, Systems Engineering and Computer Science Department UFRJ Brasil (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Savcenko, A., Tanveer, B.: Software Process Improvement Success Factors - through systematic review and industrial survey. Master thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goldenson, D., Herbsleb, J.: After the Appraisal: A systematic Survey of Process Improvement, its Benefits, and Factors that Influence Success. Software Engineering Institute (SEI), TR CMU/SEI-95-TR-009 ESC-TR-95-009 (1995), http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/95.reports/pdf/tr009.95.pdf

  17. El Emam, K., Goldenson, D., McCurley, J., Herbsleb, J.: Modeling the likelihood of software process improvement. Empirical Software Engineering 6(3), 207–229 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaltio, T., Kinnula, A.: Deploying the defined software process. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 5(1), 65–83 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hantos, P., Gisbert, M.: Identifying software productivity improvement approaches and risks: construction industry case study. IEEE Software 17(1), 48–56 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sassenburg, H.: Assessing readiness for (software) process Improvement, Methods & Tools, pp. 18–24 (Spring 2002), http://www.methodsandtools.com/archive/archive.php?id=35

  21. Hall, T., Rainer, A., Baddoo, N.: Implementing Software Process Improvement: An Empirical Study. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 7(3), 3–15 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guerrero, F., Eterovic, Y.: Adopting the SW-CMM in a Small IT Organization. IEEE Software 21(4), 29–35 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Niazi, M., Willson, D., Zowghi, D.: A maturity model for the implementation of software process improvement: an empirical study. Journal of Systems and Software 74(2), 155–172 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson, D., Hall, T., Baddoo, N.: A framework for evaluation and prediction of software process improvement success. Journal of Systems and Software 59(2), 135–142 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mohd, H., Ahmad, R., Hassan, N.: Resistance Factors in the Implementation of Software Process Improvement Project in Malaysia. Journal of Computer Science 4(3), 211–219 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Koining, S., Sicilia, M., Messnarz, R., Barriocanal, E., Garre, M., Siakas, K., Clarke, A.: Understanding the relation of SPI and SR: A proposed mapping of the SPI Manifesto to ISO 26000:2010. In: Proceedings of the EUROSPI 2011, pp. 7.27–7.37 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bayona, S., Calvo-Manzano, J.A., San Feliu, T. (2013). Review of Critical Success Factors Related to People in Software Process Improvement. In: McCaffery, F., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 364. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39179-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39179-8_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39178-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39179-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics