Advertisement

Smart Integration of Process Improvement Reference Models Based on an Automated Comparison Approach

  • Simona Jeners
  • Horst Lichter
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 364)

Abstract

A variety of reference models such as CMMI, COBIT or ITIL supports IT organizations to improve their processes. Although these process improvement reference models (IRMs) cover different domains, they also share some similarities. There are organizations that address multiple domains under the guidance of different IRMs. As IRMs overlap in some processes and have inter-dependencies, we developed an approach to integrate multiple IRMs. This enables organizations to efficiently adopt and assess multiple IRMs by automatically identifying IRM similarities and their dependencies. In this paper, we give an overview of this approach and particularly focus on its evaluation.

Keywords

reference models software process improvement comparison meta-models similarity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    The Standish Group International: CHAOS Summary 2009. Chaos, pp. 1–4 (2009), http://www.statelibrary.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/document/690719/ (retrieved)
  2. 2.
    ISO/IEC TR 24774: Systems and software engineering – Life Cycle Management – Guide-lines for process descriptions (2010) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jeners, S., Lichter, H., Dragomir, A.: Towards an Integration of Multiple Process Improvement Reference Models based on Automated Concept Extraction. In: Winkler, D., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2012. CCIS, vol. 301, pp. 205–216. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rector, A.L., Wroe, C., Rogers, J., Roberts, A.: Untangling taxonomies and relationships: personal and practical problems in loosely coupled development of large ontologies. In: Proceedings of the K-CAP 2001, pp. 139–146. ACM (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guarino, N., Welty, C.: Ontology Analysis of Taxonomic Relationships. Data and Knowledge Engineering Journal 39, 51–74 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmidt, M., Polowinski, J., Johannes, J., Fernández, M.A.: An integrated facet-based library for arbitrary software components. In: Kühne, T., Selic, B., Gervais, M.-P., Terrier, F. (eds.) ECMFA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6138, pp. 261–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kensche, D., Quix, C., Chatti, M., Jarke, M.: GeRoMe: a generic role based metamodel for model management. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ontologies, DataBases, and Applications of Semantics (ODBASE), Agia Napa, Cyprus (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jeners, S., Lichter, H., Pyatkova, E.: Metric based Comparison of Reference Models based on Similarity. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications (JDCTA) 6(21) (November 2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jeners, S., Lichter, H.: Automated Comparison of Process Improvement Reference Models based on Similarity Metrics. In: Proceedings of APSEC 2012, Hong Kong (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, X., Staples, M.: Using Practice Outcome Areas to Understand Perceived Value of CMMI Specific Practices for SMEs. In: Abrahamsson, P., Baddoo, N., Margaria, T., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4764, pp. 59–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, X., Staples, M., Banermann, P.: Analysis of Dependencies between Specific Practices in CMMI Maturity Level 2. In: O’Connor, R.V., Baddoo, N., Smolander, K., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2008. CCIS, vol. 16, pp. 94–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simona Jeners
    • 1
  • Horst Lichter
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Group Software ConstructionRWTH Aachen UniversityGermany

Personalised recommendations