Advertisement

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine altered pressure garments requested by burn patients, in Taiwan. Three hundred forty-two pressure garments needing alterations were collected from 127 burn patients at the Sunshine Foundation Organization, an nonprofit organization for burn patients to identify the major defects found in these pressure garments and their causes. Causes of required alterations were classified according to a hierarchical coding scheme focusing on poor fit, discomfort, component part, fabric and sewing, and cosmetics to identify systematic problems for each garment type. The result of our analysis indicated that the majority of the pressure garment alterations were related to poor fit in circumferential and longitudinal dimensions of the various body parts, incorrect position and size of openings for eyes, nose, ears, and mouth, or inappropriate length or position of zippers. Information derived from this causal analysis can be applied in helping to reduce the recurrence of alterations in pressure garment, thus improving the quality and effectiveness of pressure therapy.

Keywords

pressure garment defect analysis causal analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bennett, K.A., Osborne, R.H.: Interobserver measurement in anthropometry. Human Biology 58(5), 751–759 (1986)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bio-Concepts Inc., Measuring for custom-made pressure garments. Bio-Concepts Inc., Phoenix (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, C.A.: A comparison of the outcomes of two clinical audits of burn pressure garment satisfaction and compliance in Saudi Arabia. Burns 27, 342–348 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, P., Rice, J.: Ready-to-wear apparel analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng, S., Chan, A., Fong, S., Lam, M., Leung, A., Lee, P., Tsang, J., Wong, J., Wu, A.: Outcome studies for burn patients in Hong Kong: patients’ satisfaction. Burns 22(8), 623–626 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chi, C.-F., Chang, T.-C., Ting, H.-I.: Accident Patterns and Prevention Measures for Fatal Occupational Falls in the Construction Industry. Applied Ergonomics 36, 391–400 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chi, C.-F., Yang, C.-C., Chen, Z.-L.: In-Depth Accident Analysis of Electrical Fatalities in the Construction Industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics (2008) (in press)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chillarege, R., Bhandari, I.S., Chaar, J.K., Halliday, M.J., Moebus, D.S., Ray, B.K., Wong, M.Y.: Orthogonal defect classification—A concept for in-process measurements. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 18(11), 943–955 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hudson, P.B.: The role of fit and fashion in apparel quality. Bobbin 21(11), 108–122 (1980)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson, J., Greenspan, B., Gorga, D., Nagler, W., Goodwin, C.: Compliance with pressure garment use in burn rehabilitation. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation 15, 180–188 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kroemer, K.H.E.: Engineering Anthropometry. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kurtz, N.: Statistical Analysis For The Social Sciences, p. 316. Allyn & Bacon, MA (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mays, R.G., Jones, C.L., Holloway, G.J., Studinski, D.P.: Experiences with defect prevention. IBM Systems Journal 29(1), 4–32 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Macintyre, L., Baird, M.: Pressure garments for use in the treatment of hypertrophic scars—an evaluation of current construction techniques in NHS hospitals. Burns 31, 11–14 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Macintyre, L., Baird, M.: Pressure garments for use in the treatment of hypertrophic scars—a review of the problems associated with their use. Burns 32, 10–15 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mehta, C.R., Patel, N.R., Senchaudhuri, P.: Exact stratified linear rank tests for ordered categorical and binary data. J. Computational and Graphical Statistics 1, 21–40 (1992)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meunier, P., Yin, S.: Performance of a 2D image-based anthropometic measurement and clothing sizing system. Applied Ergonomics 31, 445–451 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ng-Yip, F.: Medical clothing-the stress relaxation and shrinkage of pressure garments. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 64, 17–27 (1994)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pratt, J., West, G.: Pressure Garments: A manual on their design and fabrication. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stewart, R., Bhagwanjee, A.M., Mbakaza, Y., Binase, T.: Pressure garment adherent in adult patients with burn injuries: An analysis of patient and clinician perceptions. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 54(6), 598–606 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ward, R.S.: Reasons for the selection of burn-scar-support suppliers by burn centers in the United States: a survey. Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation 14(3), 360–367 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Williams, F., Knapp, D., Wallen, M.: Comparison of the characteristics and features of pressure garments used in the management of burn scars. Burns 24, 329–335 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    You, F., Wang, J.M., Luo, X.N., Li, Y., Zhang, X.: Garment’s pressure sensation (1): subjective assessment and predictability for the sensation. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 14(5), 307–316 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chia-Fen Chi
    • 1
  • Chih-Hsiang Lin
    • 1
  • Hung-Wei Cheng
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial ManagementNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations