Advertisement

Abstract

This paper introduces a new cognitive flight operator model (CFOM) that has been developed for predicting the safety of airport approaches. The creation of the CFOM is based on the frequency and percentage of accident associated with Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) causal categories by types of operation. Operator capacity limitation, decision heuristics and action error mechanisms are incorporated into the architecture of CFOM to produce the behavior errors. This cognitive model integrated with an environment model consisting of a model of airplane, aircraft dynamics, and flight environment forms Man-Machine-Environment Safety Analysis System (MME-SAS) that canbe used to investigate the cause of human errors and aircraft accident.

Keywords

Human Performance Modeling Decision Heuristic Rule Chunk Model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shappell, S., Wiegmann, D.: U.S. naval aviation mishaps 1977-92: Differences between single- and dual-piloted aircraft. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 67, 65–69 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reason, J.: Human error. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shorrock, S.T., Kirwan, B.: Development and application of a human error identification tool for air traffic control. Applied Ergonomics 33, 319–336 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gray, W.D.: Integrated models of cognitive systems. Oxford University Press, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mark, R., Anderson, C.C., Greg, D.: Flight test maneuver design using a skill- and rule-based pilot model. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems, pp. 2682–2687 (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nolan, M.: Fundamentals of Air Traffic Control. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Monique, H., Theo, V.H., Max, M.: Flight Mechanical Evaluation of Approaches. Journal of Aircraft 48(3) (May-June 2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scott, S., Cristy, D., Kali, H., Carla, H., Albert, B., Douglas, A.W.: Human error and commercial aviation accidents: Analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 49–227 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Byrne, M.D., Pew, R.W.: A History and Primer of Human Performance Modeling. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics 5, 225 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meyer, D.E., Kieras, D.E.: A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part1. Basic mechanisms. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review 104, 3–65 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zipfel, P.H.: Modeling and Simulation of Aerospace Vehicle Dynamics. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Reston (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hanke, R.C., Nordwall, D.R.: The Simulation of a Jambo Jet Transport Aircraft. Modeling Data, vol. II, NASA Rept. D6-30643, 1–647 (September 1970)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Changpeng Yang
    • 1
  • Tangwen Yin
    • 1
  • Shan Fu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Aeronautics and AstronauticsShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations