Skip to main content

Personeneigenschaften

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Resource Management

Zusammenfassung

In der beruflichen Praxis fällt immer wieder auf, dass verschiedene Mitarbeiter – obwohl sie über die gleiche Ausbildung bzw. die gleichen Bildungsabschlüsse verfügen – unterschiedliches Verhalten zeigen und unterschiedlich gute Leistungen erbringen. Um die zukünftige Leistung eines potenziellen neuen Mitarbeiters schon bei seiner Bewerbung einschätzen zu können, beschäftigen sich Organisationen damit welche individuellen Verhaltens- und Leistungsdispositionen (Persönlichkeit, Intelligenz, Werte) für arbeitsbezogene Fragestellungen von Bedeutung sind oder worin sich Durchschnitts- und Spitzenkräfte voneinander unterscheiden. Auch stellen sie sich die Frage inwiefern Arbeitsleistung, Motivation oder Arbeitszufriedenheit durch die individuellen Merkmale von Personen erklärt werden können und ob diese Merkmale ausreichend stabil sind, sodass Vorhersagen über künftiges Verhalten möglich sind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Patton, G. K., & Haughland, S. N. (2000). Accuracy of interviewer judgments of job applicant personality traits. Personnel Psychology, 53, 925–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (2008). NEO-FFI.NEO- Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar nach Costa und McCrae. Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag GmbH & Co. KG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger, H.-J., Spath, D., Warnecke, H.-J., & Westkämper, E. (2009). Handbuch Unternehmensorganisation: Strategien, Planung, Umsetzung. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Oxford, England: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). Another perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1092–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P., Jr., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 322–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: PAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denney, N. W. (1982). Aging and cognitive changes. In B. B. Wolman (Hrsg.), Handbook of developmental psychology (S. 807–827). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr, J., & Tippins, N. (Hrsg.). (2010). Handbook of employee selection. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24(1), 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannover, B., & Kühnen, U. (2002). Der Einfluss independenter und interdependenter Selbstkonstruktion auf die Informationsverarbeitung im sozialen Kontext. Psychologische Rundschau, 53(2), 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth trade-off. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 627–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L. M. (1992). The “Big Five” personality variables – construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 47, 233–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P. J., & Howard, J. M. (2002). Führen mit dem Big-Five-Persönlichkeitsmodell: Das Instrument für optimale Zusammenarbeit. Frankfurt/Main: Campus-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffcutt, A. I., Conway, J. M., Roth, P. L., & Stone, N. J. (2001). Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 897–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, A. O., Süß, H.-M., & Beauducel, A. (1997). Test für das Berliner Intelligenzstrukturmodell (BIS). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., (2004). Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 Years after Spearman s (1904) „GeneralIntelligence“, objectively determined and measured. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 96–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maio, G. R., Roese, N., Seligman, C., & Katz, A. (1996). Ratings, rankings, and the measurement of values: Evidence for the superior validity of ratings. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, E. J., & Tiffin, J. (1974). Industrial psychology (6. Aufl.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood. A five-factor theory perspective. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are openness and intellect distinct aspects of openness to experience? A test of the O/I model. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 571–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Salgado, J. F. (2010). Cognitive abilities. In J. Farr & N. Tippins (Hrsg.), Handbook of employee selection (S. 255–275). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Dilchert, S. (2005). Personality at work: Raising awareness and correcting misconceptions. Human Performance, 18, 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ployhart, R. E., & Holtz, B. C. (2008). The diversity-validity dilemma: Strategies for reducing racioethnic and sex subgroup differences and adverse impact in selection. Personnel Psychology, 61, 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravlin, E. C., & Meglino, B. M. (1987). Effects of values on perception and decision making: A study of alternative work values measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 666–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age. A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 26, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. D., Amabile, T. M., & Steinmetz, J. L. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(7), 485–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaie, K. W. (2005). Developmental influences on adult intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schaper, N. (2007). Persönliche Verhaltens- und Leistungsdispositionen. In H. Schuler & K. Sonntag (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie. Handbuch der Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (Bd. 6, S. 219–229). Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag GmbH & Co. KG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H., & Sonntag, K. (Hrsg.). (2007). Handbuch der Psychologie: Vol. 6. Handbuch der Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag GmbH & Co. KG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology (25. Aufl., S. 1–65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 878–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stemmler, G., Hagemann, D., Amelang, M., & Bartussek, D. (2011). Differentielle Psychologie und Persönlichkeitsforschung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Iddekinge, C. H., Campbell, J. P., & Putka, D. J. (2011). Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: The validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Measurement error in “Big Five factors” personality assessment: Reliability generalization across studies and measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 224–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, A. (2004). Organisations- und Personalpsychologie (5. Aufl.). Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G., John, O. P., Stewart, A. J., Klohnen, E. C., & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105(2), 230–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Rowold .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krüger, C., Flasche, S., Rowold, J. (2013). Personeneigenschaften. In: Human Resource Management. Springer Gabler, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39152-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39152-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39151-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39152-1

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics