Abstract
Semantic network theories of knowledge organization support the idea that recall of organized information depends on how well a learner encodes the connections between the items in the semantic network. However, there is need for more research into what this implies for configuring instruction so that strong semantic network learning is supported with the goal of creating an integrated mental model in the student’s mind. We investigate this question in the context of map learning, where country names are encoded relative to geographic border, internal features, or external features. The main hypothesis was that external features as cues would encourage transfer, since students would practice a network of relationships. The results primarily supported a theory of “cue reinstatement”, where transfer occurred when cues present at learning were present at testing. These effects were analyzed with a mixed effects logistic regression learner model of trial-by-trial learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Collins, A.M., Quillian, M.R.: Retrieval Time from Semantic Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8, 240–247 (1969)
Rogers, T.: Computational Models of Semantic Memory. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology, pp. 226–267. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)
Collins, A.M., Loftus, E.F.: A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing. Psychological Review 82, 407–428 (1975)
Bartlett, F.C.: Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1932)
Schank, R.C., Abelson, R.P.: Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1977)
Tulving, E., Pearlstone, Z.: Availability Versus Accessibility of Information in Memory for Words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 5, 381–391 (1966)
Dole, J.A., Sinatra, G.M.: Reconceptualizing Change in the Cognitive Construction of Knowledge. Educational Psychologist 33, 109–128 (1998)
Cobb, P.: Constructivism in Mathematics and Science Education. Educational Researcher 23, 4 (1994)
Chi, M.T.: Conceptual Change within and across Ontological Categories: Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science. In: Cognitive Models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pp. 129–160 (1992)
Vosniadou, S., Brewer, W.F.: Theories of Knowledge Restructuring in Development. Review of Educational Research 57, 51–67 (1987)
Bransford, J.D., Vye, N., Kinzer, C., Risko, V.: Teaching Thinking and Content Knowledge: Toward an Integrated Approach. In: Jones, B.F., Idol, L. (eds.) Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction: Implications for Educational Reform, vol. 1, pp. 381–413. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1990)
Michael, A.L., Klee, T., Bransford, J.D., Warren, S.F.: The Transition Form Theory to Therapy: Test of Two Instructional Methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology 7, 139–153 (1993)
White, B.Y., Frederiksen, J.R.: Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students. Cognition and Instruction 16, 3–118 (1998)
Pavlik Jr., P.I., Presson, N., Dozzi, G., Wu, S., MacWhinney, B., Koedinger, K.R.: The FaCT (Fact and Concept Training) System: A New Tool Linking Cognitive Science with Educators. In: McNamara, D., Trafton, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 397–402. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2007)
Central Intelligence Agency, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/
Draney, K.L., Pirolli, P., Wilson, M.: A Measurement Model for a Complex Cognitive Skill. In: Nichols, P.D., Chipman, S.F., Brennan, R.L. (eds.) Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment, pp. 103–125 (1995)
Pavlik Jr., P.I., Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R.: Performance Factors Analysis – A New Alternative to Knowledge Tracing. In: Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R., du Boulay, B., Graesser, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Brighton, England, pp. 531–538 (2009)
VanLehn, K.: The Behavior of Tutoring Systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 16, 227–265 (2006)
Son, J.Y., Smith, L.B., Goldstone, R.L.: Simplicity and Generalization: Short-Cutting Abstraction in Children’s Object Categorizations. Cognition 108, 626 (2008)
Mayer, R.E.: Can Advance Organizers Influence Meaningful Learning? Review of Educational Research 49, 371–383 (1979)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Maass, J.K., Pavlik, P.I. (2013). Using Learner Modeling to Determine Effective Conditions of Learning for Optimal Transfer. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39111-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39112-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)