Skip to main content

Can Online Peer-Review Systems Support Group Mentorship?

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7926))

Abstract

As we are entering the age of open social e-learning environments, group (peer) mentorship becomes an increasingly important mode of learning. The academic peer review system can be viewed as a group mentorship system. Peer reviews have been used for over a century by the research community to provide not only quality control for publishing new research contributions, but also as a way to provide constructive feedback to the authors and help them to improve their work. There are two critical questions that need to be addressed in both peer-review and group peer mentorship: 1) how to motivate reviewers (mentors) to give serious, detailed and constructive feedback, 2) how to find good reviewers (mentors) for a particular author (mentee). This research addresses the above questions in the context of a group online peer-mentorship system aimed at improving the writing skills of university students using a conference peer review model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adewoyin, O., Vassileva, J.: Recommendation, Trust and Reputation Management in a Group Online Mentorship System. In: Kravcik, M., Santos, O.C., Boticario, J.G., Perez-Marin, D. (eds.) UMAP 2012. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 53–58 (2012) ISSN 1613-0073

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lawrence, E.C., Levy, M., Martin, N., Strother-Taylor, J.: Case Studies in Youth Mentoring, One-on-One and Group Mentoring: An Integrated Approach. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, Mentoring Resource Center (2008), http://educationnorthwest.org/webfm_send/216 (accessed: March 25, 2012)

  3. McKisack, C., Waller, G.: Factors Influencing the Outcome of Group Psychotherapy for Bulimia Nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorder 22(1), 1–13 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vassileva, J., Greer, J., McCalla, G., Deters, R., Zapata, D., Mudgal, C., Grant, S.: A Multi-Agent Approach to the Design of Peer-Help Environments. In: Lajoie, S., Vivet, M. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence and Education, pp. 38–45. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Adewoyin, O., Vassileva, J. (2013). Can Online Peer-Review Systems Support Group Mentorship?. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_101

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_101

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39111-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39112-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics