Skip to main content

Enhancing Product Line Development by Safety Requirements and Verification

  • Conference paper
Foundations of Health Information Engineering and Systems (FHIES 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7789))

Abstract

In product lines of safety-critical medical devices, the safety requirements vary in the same lines as the products. We propose a uniform integration of safety requirements into a model-driven feature-oriented design methodology of product lines. We extend the Scade development framework by a transformational approach to product line design: both the design modifications and the adaptation of safety requirements constitute a feature at a certain development phase. Thus both are described in terms of a model graph transformation. Then design models and the safety constraints associated to a product result from a sequence of feature-specific model transformations applied on a base model. This builds the basis for systematic and traceable product line verification and safety assurance. We evaluate our approach on a product line of cardiac pacemakers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdulla, P.A., Deneux, J., Stålmarck, G., Ågren, H., Åkerlund, O.: Designing safe, reliable systems using Scade. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2004. LNCS, vol. 4313, pp. 115–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Apel, S., Kästner, C.: An overview of feature-oriented software development. Journal of Object Technology 8(5), 49–84 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Azanza, M., Batory, D., Díaz, O., Trujillo, S.: Domain-specific composition of model deltas. In: Tratt, L., Gogolla, M. (eds.) ICMT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6142, pp. 16–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernstein, Daubert, Fletcher, Hayes, Lüderitz, Reynolds, Schoenfeld, Sutton: The revised NASPE/BPEG generic code for antibradycardia, adaptive-rate, and multisite pacing. Journal of Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 25, 260–264 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Classen, A., Heymans, P., Schobbens, P.Y., Legay, A.: Symbolic model checking of software product lines. In: Intern. Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 321–330 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Classen, A., Heymans, P., Schobbens, P.Y., Legay, A., Raskin, J.F.: Model checking lots of systems: efficient verification of temporal properties in software product lines. In: Intern. Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 335–344 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Esterel Technologies: SCADE Suite KCG 6.1: Safety case report of KCG 6.1.2 (July 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fischbein, D., Uchitel, S., Brabermann, V.: A foundation for behavioural conformance in software product line architectures. In: ISSTA 2006 Workshop on Role of Software Architecture for Testing and Analysis (ROSATEA), pp. 39–48. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gray, J., Zhang, J., Lin, Y., Roychoudhury, S., Wu, H., Sudarsan, R., Gokhale, A., Neema, S., Shi, F., Bapty, T.: Model-driven program transformation of a large avionics framework. In: Karsai, G., Visser, E. (eds.) GPCE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3286, pp. 361–378. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Haugen, Møller-Pedersen, Oldevik, Olsen, Svendsen: Adding standardized variability to domain specific languages. In: Intern. Software Product Line Conference, pp. 139–148. IEEE Computer Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huhn, M., Bessling, S.: Towards certifiable software for medical devices: The pacemaker case study revisited. In: Intern. Workshop on Harnessing Theories for Tool Support in Software, pp. 8–14 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jee, E., Lee, I., Sokolsky, O.: Assurance cases in model-driven development of the pacemaker software. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6416, pp. 343–356. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Jee, Wang, Kim, Lee, Sokolsky, Lee: A safety-assured development approach for real-time software. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 16th International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications, pp. 133–142. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/RTCSA.2010.42

  14. Jiang, Z., Pajic, M., Moarref, S., Alur, R., Mangharam, R.: Modeling and verification of a dual chamber implantable pacemaker. In: Flanagan, C., König, B. (eds.) TACAS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7214, pp. 188–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, J., Basu, S., Lutz, R.R.: Compositional model checking of software product lines using variation point obligations. Autom. Softw. Eng. 18(1), 39–76 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, J., Dehlinger, J., Lutz, R.R.: Safety analysis of software product lines using state-based modeling. The Journal of Systems and Software 80, 1879–1892 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Méry, D., Singh, N.K.: Functional behavior of a cardiac pacing system. Intern. Journal of Discrete Event Control Systems, IJDECS (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Object Management Group: OMG Systems Modeling Language V 1.2 (2010), www.omg.org/spec/SysML/1.2/

  19. Schaefer, I., Gurov, D., Soleimanifard, S.: Compositional algorithmic verification of software product lines. In: Aichernig, B.K., de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M. (eds.) FMCO 2010. LNCS, vol. 6957, pp. 184–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Schobbens, P.Y., Heymans, P., Trigaux, J.C.: Feature diagrams: A survey and a formal semantics. In: Intern. Conf. on Requirements Engineering (RE), pp. 136–145 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scientific, B.: PACEMAKER System Specification (January 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tuan, Zheng, Tho: Modeling and verification of safety critical systems: A case study on pacemaker. In: 4th Conf. on Secure Software Integration and Reliability Improvement, pp. 23–32. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Varró, D., Varró, G., Pataricza, A.: Designing the automatic transformation of visual languages. Science of Computer Programming 44(2), 205–227 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Huhn, M., Bessling, S. (2013). Enhancing Product Line Development by Safety Requirements and Verification. In: Weber, J., Perseil, I. (eds) Foundations of Health Information Engineering and Systems. FHIES 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7789. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39088-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39088-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39087-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39088-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics