Skip to main content

On the Interpolation between Product-Based Message Passing Heuristics for SAT

  • Conference paper
Book cover Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2013 (SAT 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7962))

Abstract

This paper introduces a notational frame to characterize the four basic product-based Message Passing (MP) heuristics currently available for SAT: Belief Propagation (BP), Survey Propagation (SP), Expectation Maximization BP Global (EMBPG) and Expectation Maximization SP Global (EMSPG). Using this framework, the paper introduces indirect structural interpolation (ISI). Using this technique, we create a hierarchy of heuristics – each new level in this hierarchy consists of heuristics strictly more general than their predecessors. The final result is the ρσPMPi heuristic, which is able to mimic all product-based MP heuristics and is hence a generalization for all them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aurell, E., Gordon, U., Kirkpatrick, S.: Comparing Beliefs, Surveys and Random Walks. In: Adv. in Neural Information Processing Sys. 17, p. 49. MIT Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Battaglia, D., Kolář, M., Zecchina, R.: Minimizing energy below the glass thresholds. Physical Review E 70, 036107 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biere, A.: Lingeling SAT solver, Version ala-b02aala, http://fmv.jku.at/lingeling/lingeling-ala-b02aa1a-121013.tar.gz

  4. Braunstein, A., Mézard, M., Zecchina, R.: Survey Propagation: An Algorithm for Satisfiability. Journal of Rand. Struct. and Algo., 201 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chavas, J., Furtlehner, C., Mézard, M., Zecchina, R.: Survey-propagation decimation through distributed local computations. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment (2005) 1742-5468 / 05 / P11016

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gableske, O.: Dimetheus SAT solver, Version 1.6, https://www.gableske.net/dimetheus

  7. Gableske, O., Müelich, S., Diepold, D.: On the Performance of CDCL based Message Passing Inspired Decimation using ρσPMPi. Submitted to the Proceedings of the Pragmatics of SAT Workshop, POS 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hsu, E.I., McIlraith, S.A.: VARSAT: Integrating Novel Probabilistic Inference Techniques with DPLL Search. In: Kullmann, O. (ed.) SAT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5584, pp. 377–390. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsu, E.I., McIlraith, S.A.: Characterizing Propagation Methods for Boolean Satisfiability. In: Biere, A., Gomes, C.P. (eds.) SAT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4121, pp. 325–338. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hsu, E.I., Muise, C.J., Beck, J.C., McIlraith, S.A.: Probabilistically Estimating Backbones and Variable Bias: Experimental Overview. In: Stuckey, P.J. (ed.) CP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5202, pp. 613–617. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsu, E., Kitching, M., Bacchus, F., McIlraith, S.: Using Expectation Maximization to Find Likely Assignments for Solving CSPs. In: AAAI 2007, p. 224. AAAI Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jeroslow, R., Wang, J.: Solving Propositional Satisfiability Problems. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 1, 167 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Schischang, K., Frey, B., Loeliger, H.: Factor Graphs and the sum-product algorithm. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 47, 498 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maneva, E., Mossel, E., Wainwright, M.J.: A New Look at Survey Propagation and its Generalizations, arXiv:cs/0409012v3, 01 (February 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mézard, M., Parisi, G.: The cavity method at zero temperature. Journal of Statistical Physics 111(1/2) (April 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moskewicz, M., Madigan, C., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Chaff: Engineering an Efficient SAT Solver. In: DAC 2001, p. 530. ACM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pipatsrisawat, K., Darwiche, A.: A lightweight component caching scheme for Satisfiability Solvers. In: Marques-Silva, J., Sakallah, K.A. (eds.) SAT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4501, pp. 294–299. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gableske, O. (2013). On the Interpolation between Product-Based Message Passing Heuristics for SAT. In: Järvisalo, M., Van Gelder, A. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2013. SAT 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7962. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39071-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39071-5_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39070-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39071-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics