Impact of Using Rule Algorithms on Designers’ Behavior in a Parametric Design Environment: Preliminary Result from a Pilot Study

  • Rongrong Yu
  • John Gero
  • Ning Gu
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 369)

Abstract

This paper presents preliminary results from a pilot protocol study of the cognitive behavior differences of designers in a parametric design environment and a traditional geometry modeling environment. The aim is to explore the impact of the rule algorithm feature in parametric design by comparing designers’ behavior in these two design environments. Three architects participated in the experiment in which each of them was required to complete two design sessions, one in each environment. The protocols are coded using the function-behavior-structure (FBS) coding scheme. Preliminary results show that the overall behavior is not significantly affected by the environment; however, there are significant differences at different design stages in the two design environments.

Keywords

parametric design environment geometry modeling environment design cognition designer behavior protocol analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Akin, Ö.: Necessary Conditions for Design Expertise and Creativity. Design Studies 11, 107–113 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atman, C.J., Chimka, J.R., Bursic, K.M., Nachtmann, H.L.: A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes. Design Studies 20, 131–152 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cross, N.: Expertise in Design: An Overview. Design Studies 25, 427–441 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A.: Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press, Mass (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gero, J.S.: Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design. AI Magazine 11, 26–36 (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gero, J.S., Mc Neill, T.: An Approach to the Analysis of Design Protocols. Design Studies 19, 21–61 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iordanova, I., Tidafi, T., Guité, M., De Paoli, G., Lachapelle, J.: Parametric Methods of Exploration and Creativity During Architectural Design: A Case Study in the Design Studio. In: 13th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures, pp. 423–439. Presses de l’Univ. de Montréal, Montréal (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: Acquiring Information from Linkography in Protocol Studies of Designing. Design Studies 29, 315–337 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: Studing Software Design Cognition. In: Petre, M., Van der Hoek, A. (eds.) Software Designers in Action: A Human-Centric Look at Design Work (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kan, J.W.T., Gero, J.S.: Using the Fbs Ontology to Capture Semantic Design Information in Design Protocol Studies. In: McDonnell, J., Lloyd, P. (eds.) About: Designing. Analysing Design Meetings, pp. 213–229. Taylor & Francis, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kolarevic, B.: Architecture in the Digital Age: Design and Manufacturing. Spon Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee, J., Gu, N., Jupp, J., Sherratt, S.: Towards a Formal Evaluation of Creativity in Parametric Design Process: A Pilot Study. In: Design Research Society Conference 2012, pp. 959–970. Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanguinetti, P., Kraus, C.: Thinking in Parametric Phenomenology. In: Parametricism (SPC) ACADIA Regional 2011 Conference, pp. 39–48. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schnabel, M.A.: Parametric Designing in Architecture. In: 12th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures, pp. 237–250. Springer, Sydney (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suwa, M., Tversky, B.: What Do Architects and Students Perceive in Their Design Sketches? A Protocol Analysis. Design Studies 18, 385–403 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tang, H.H., Lee, Y.Y., Gero, J.S.: Comparing Collaborative Co-Located and Distributed Design Processes in Digital and Traditional Sketching Environments: A protocol Study Using the Function-Behaviour-Structure Coding Scheme. Design Studies 32, 1–29 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Woodbury, R.: Elements of Parametric Design. Routledge, New York (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rongrong Yu
    • 1
  • John Gero
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ning Gu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of architecture and built environmentUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  2. 2.Krasnow Institute for Advanced StudyGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  3. 3.University of North Carolina at CharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations