Research on the Relationship Between Threat and Crew Error in Civil Aviation

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 259)

Abstract

To study the relationship between threat and crew error, the brief description of 84 civil aviation accidents and incidents whose primary causes were flight crew were obtained and coded. Chi-square test was performed to explore the strength of association between the threat and crew error. The results show that adverse weather and other procedural error, aircraft fault and manual flying error, dispatch/paperwork fault and documentation error, ground maintenance fault and flight control error, and manuals/charts fault and ground navigation error had strong association; those threats significantly increased the prediction of occurrence of crew error; the accuracy of prediction was 5.3–20 %. It is suggested to reduce the crew error by enhancing crew task management training and strengthening the management of other occupation’s error in civil aviation. .

Keywords

Civil aviation transport flight Threat Error Association Flight safety 

References

  1. 1.
    Luo X (2002) Cockpit resource management. Press of Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, pp 3–4Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ICAO (2002) Line operations safety audit (DOC 9803-AN/761)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huo Z, Lv R, Shi Y (2007) Threat and error management in civil aviation operation. J Saf Sci China 17(12):60–65 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flight Standard Department of Civil Aviation Administration of China (2011) Crew resource management advisory circular (AC-121-FS-2011-41)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lv R, Zhou Y, Zhou M (2009) Analysis of team error in air traffic control. J Saf Sci China 19(1):64–70Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cao H, Li T (2011) Study on threat, error and undesired states in air traffic control based on Bayesian method. J Saf Sci China 21(8):85–89Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Civil Aviation Administration of China (2006–2010) Flight accidents, ground accidents and flight incidents statistics.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    (2006) Defensive flying for pilots: an introduction to threat and error management. The University of Texas Human Factors Research ProjectGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen J, Yang J, Li Q et al (2010) Research on the relationship between crew resource management and unsafe acts of flight crew. J Saf Sci China 20(3):92–96Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang D (2009) Influence of time pressure, and number of attributes on information processing in decision making. J Shandong Normal Univ 54(6):126–130Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuchuan Luo
    • 1
  • Jun Chen
    • 1
  • Jiazhong Yang
    • 1
  • Xuemei Deng
    • 1
  1. 1.Aviation Human Factor and Ergonomics LabCivil Aviation Flight University of ChinaGuanghanChina

Personalised recommendations