Predicting Cognitive Data from Medical Images Using Sparse Linear Regression
We present a new framework for predicting cognitive or other continuous-variable data from medical images. Current methods of probing the connection between medical images and other clinical data typically use voxel-based mass univariate approaches. These approaches do not take into account the multivariate, network-based interactions between the various areas of the brain and do not give readily interpretable metrics that describe how strongly cognitive function is related to neuroanatomical structure. On the other hand, high-dimensional machine learning techniques do not typically provide a direct method for discovering which parts of the brain are used for making predictions. We present a framework, based on recent work in sparse linear regression, that addresses both drawbacks of mass univariate approaches, while preserving the direct spatial interpretability that they provide. In addition, we present a novel optimization algorithm that adapts the conjugate gradient method for sparse regression on medical imaging data. This algorithm produces coefficients that are more interpretable than existing sparse regression techniques.
KeywordsOrthogonal Match Pursuit Sparse Solution Boston Naming Test Sparse Regression Cortical Thickness Measurement
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Ashburner, J., Friston, K.J.: Voxel-based morphometry–the methods. NeuroImage 11(6 pt. 1), 805–821 (2000); PMID: 10860804Google Scholar
- 7.Das, S.R., Avants, B.B., Grossman, M., Gee, J.C.: Registration based cortical thickness measurement. NeuroImage 45(3), 867–879 (2009); PMID: 19150502Google Scholar
- 14.Friedman, J., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R.: Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software 33(1), 1 (2010)Google Scholar
- 17.Lee, H., Lee, D.S., Kang, H., Kim, B.-N., Chung, M.K.: Sparse brain network recovery under compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 30(5), 1154–1165Google Scholar
- 18.Morris, J.C., Heyman, A., Mohs, R.C., Hughes, J.P., van Belle, G., Fillenbaum, G., Mellits, E.D., Clark, C.: The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD). Part i. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 39(9), 1159–1165 (1989); PMID: 2771064Google Scholar
- 27.Witten, D.M., Tibshirani, R., Hastie, T.: A penalized matrix decomposition, with applications to sparse principal components and canonical correlation analysis. Biostatistics 10(3), 515–534 (1937); PMID: 19377034Google Scholar