Advertisement

Sparse Projections of Medical Images onto Manifolds

  • George H. Chen
  • Christian Wachinger
  • Polina Golland
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7917)

Abstract

Manifold learning has been successfully applied to a variety of medical imaging problems. Its use in real-time applications requires fast projection onto the low-dimensional space. To this end, out-of-sample extensions are applied by constructing an interpolation function that maps from the input space to the low-dimensional manifold. Commonly used approaches such as the Nyström extension and kernel ridge regression require using all training points. We propose an interpolation function that only depends on a small subset of the input training data. Consequently, in the testing phase each new point only needs to be compared against a small number of input training data in order to project the point onto the low-dimensional space. We interpret our method as an out-of-sample extension that approximates kernel ridge regression. Our method involves solving a simple convex optimization problem and has the attractive property of guaranteeing an upper bound on the approximation error, which is crucial for medical applications. Tuning this error bound controls the sparsity of the resulting interpolation function. We illustrate our method in two clinical applications that require fast mapping of input images onto a low-dimensional space.

Keywords

Support Vector Support Vector Regression Error Tolerance Training Point Respiratory Gating 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aronszajn, N.: Theory of reproducing kernels. Trans. AMS (1950)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bach, F.R., Jenatton, R., Mairal, J., Obozinski, G.: Optimization with sparsity-inducing penalties. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck, A., Teboulle, M.: A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belkin, M., Niyogi, P.: Laplacian eigenmaps and spectral techniques for embedding and clustering. In: NIPS (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bengio, Y., Paiement, J.F., Vincent, P., Delalleau, O., Roux, N.L., Ouimet, M.: Out-of-sample extensions for LLE, Isomap, MDS, eigenmaps, and spectral clustering. In: NIPS (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhatia, K.K., Rao, A., Price, A.N., Wolz, R., Hajnal, J., Rueckert, D.: Hierarchical manifold learning. In: Ayache, N., Delingette, H., Golland, P., Mori, K. (eds.) MICCAI 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7510, pp. 512–519. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cawley, G.C., Talbot, N.L.C.: Reduced rank kernel ridge regression. Neural Processing Letters (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donoho, D.L., Grimes, C.: Hessian eigenmaps: New locally linear embedding techniques for high-dimensional data. PNAS (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drucker, H., Burges, C.J.C., Kaufman, L., Smola, A.J., Vapnik, V.: Support vector regression machines. In: NIPS (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Georg, M., Souvenir, R., Hope, A., Pless, R.: Manifold learning for 4d ct reconstruction of the lung. In: CVPR Workshops (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gerber, S., Tasdizen, T., Joshi, S., Whitaker, R.: On the manifold structure of the space of brain images. In: Yang, G.-Z., Hawkes, D., Rueckert, D., Noble, A., Taylor, C. (eds.) MICCAI 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5761, pp. 305–312. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamm, J., Davatzikos, C., Verma, R.: Efficient large deformation registration via geodesics on a learned manifold of images. In: Yang, G.-Z., Hawkes, D., Rueckert, D., Noble, A., Taylor, C. (eds.) MICCAI 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5761, pp. 680–687. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van der Maaten, L.J.P., Postma, E.O., van den Herik, H.J.: Dimensionality reduction: A comparative review. Tilburg University Technical Report (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Natarajan, B.K.: Sparse Approximate Solutions to Linear Systems. SIAM J. Comput. (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rohde, G.K., Wang, W., Peng, T., Murphy, R.F.: Deformation-based nonlinear dimension reduction: Applications to nuclear morphometry. In: ISBI (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rohlfing, T., Maurer Jr., C.R., O’Dell, W.G., Zhong, J.: Modeling liver motion and deformation during the respiratory cycle using intensity-based free-form registration of gated MR images. In: Medical Imaging: Visualization, Display, and Image-Guided Procedures (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roweis, S.T., Saul, L.K.: Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saunders, C., Gammerman, A., Vovk, V.: Ridge regression learning algorithm in dual variables. In: ICML (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schölkopf, B., Smola, A.J.: Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. MIT Press (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suzuki, K., Zhang, J., Xu, J.: Massive-training artificial neural network coupled with laplacian-eigenfunction-based dimensionality reduction for computer-aided detection of polyps in ct colonography. IEEE TMI (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tenenbaum, J.B., de Silva, V., Langford, J.C.: A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wachinger, C., Mateus, D., Keil, A., Navab, N.: Manifold learning for patient position detection in MRI. In: ISBI (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wachinger, C., Yigitsoy, M., Navab, N.: Manifold learning for image-based breathing gating with application to 4D ultrasound. In: Jiang, T., Navab, N., Pluim, J.P.W., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6362, pp. 26–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang, Q., Souvenir, R., Pless, R.: On Manifold Structure of Cardiac MRI Data: Application to Segmentation. In: CVPR (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • George H. Chen
    • 1
  • Christian Wachinger
    • 1
  • Polina Golland
    • 1
  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations