Skip to main content

A Framework for Trust-Based Multidisciplinary Team Recommendation

  • Conference paper
User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7899))

Abstract

Often one needs to form teams in order to perform a complex collaborative task. Therefore, it is interesting and useful to assess how well constituents of a team have performed, and leverage this knowledge to guide future team formation. In this work we propose a model for assessing the reputation of participants in collaborative teams. The model takes into account several features such as the different skills that a participant has and the feedback of team participants on her/his previous works. We validate our model based on synthetic datasets extrapolated from real-life scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chhabra, M., Das, S., Szymanski, B.: Team formation in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reece, S., Roberts, S., Rogers, A., Jennings, N.R.: A multi-dimensional trust model for heterogeneous contract observations. In: Proceedings of the 22nd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2007, vol. 1, pp. 128–135. AAAI Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lappas, T., Liu, K., Terzi, E.: Finding a team of experts in social networks. In: Elder IV, J.F., Fogelman-Soulié, F., Flach, P.A., Zaki, M.J. (eds.) KDD, pp. 467–476. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Braghin, S., Yong, J.T.T., Ventresque, A., Datta, A.: SWAT: Social Web Application for Team Recommendation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Scalable Computing for Big Data Analytics, SC-BDA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kardan, A., Omidvar, A., Farahmandnia, F.: Expert finding on social network with link analysis approach. In: 2011 19th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), pp. 1–6 (May 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jøsang, A., Hayward, R., Pope, S.: Trust network analysis with subjective logic. In: Proceedings of the 29th Australasian Computer Science Conference, ACSC 2006, vol. 48, pp. 85–94. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng, X., Wu, Z., Chen, H., Mao, Y.: Developing a composite trust model for multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. AAMAS 2006, pp. 1257–1259. ACM, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Reece, S., Rogers, A., Roberts, S., Jennings, N.R.: Rumours and reputation: evaluating multi-dimensional trust within a decentralised reputation system. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. AAMAS 2007, pp. 165:1–165:8. ACM, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kazienko, P., Musiał, K., Kajdanowicz, T.: Multidimensional Social Network in the Social Recommender System. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 41(4), 746–759 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nepal, S., Bista, S.K., Paris, C.: An association based approach to propagate social trust in social networks. In: UMAP Workshops (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pizzato, L., Rej, T., Akehurst, J., Koprinska, I., Yacef, K., Kay, J.: Recommending people to people: the nature of reciprocal recommenders with a case study in online dating. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 1–42 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pizzato, L., Rej, T., Chung, T., Koprinska, I., Kay, J.: Recon: a reciprocal recommender for online dating. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2010, pp. 207–214. ACM, New York (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Pizzato, L.A., Rej, T., Yacef, K., Koprinska, I., Kay, J.: Finding someone you will like and who won’t reject you. In: Konstan, J.A., Conejo, R., Marzo, J.L., Oliver, N. (eds.) UMAP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6787, pp. 269–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Masthoff, J.: Group recommender systems: Combining individual models. In: Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 677–702 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grandison, T., Sloman, M.: A survey of trust in internet applications. Commun. Surveys Tuts. 3(4), 2–16 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jøsang, A., Pope, S.: Semantic constraints for trust transitivity. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling, APCCM 2005, vol. 43, pp. 59–68. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nepal, S., Sherchan, W., Paris, C.: Building trust communities using social trust. In: Ardissono, L., Kuflik, T. (eds.) UMAP Workshops 2011. LNCS, vol. 7138, pp. 243–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Christianson, B., Harbison, W.S.: Why isn’t trust transitive? In: Crispo, B. (ed.) Security Protocols 1996. LNCS, vol. 1189, pp. 171–176. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Noam, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., Vazirani, V.V.: Algorithmic Game Theory, ch. 27. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sarwar, B.M., Karypis, G., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.T.: Application of dimensionality reduction in recommender system – a case study. In: ACM Web KDD Workshop (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Adamic, L.A., Huberman, B.A.: Power-Law Distribution of the World Wide Web. Science 287(5461), 2115 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Barabasi, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Eppstein, D., Wang, J.: A steady state model for graph power laws. In: International Workshop on Web Dynamics (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chakrabarti, D., Faloutsos, C.: Graph mining: Laws, generators, and algorithms. ACM Comput. Surv. 38(1) (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Massa, P., Avesani, P.: Trust-aware bootstrapping of recommender systems. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2006 Workshop on Recommender Systems, pp. 29–33 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. On the Fundamentals of Computer Science: Challenges, N.R.C.U.C., Opportunities: Computer Science: Reflections on the Field, Reflections from the Field. National Academies Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bossi, L., Braghin, S., Datta, A., Trombetta, A. (2013). A Framework for Trust-Based Multidisciplinary Team Recommendation. In: Carberry, S., Weibelzahl, S., Micarelli, A., Semeraro, G. (eds) User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. UMAP 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7899. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38844-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38844-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38843-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38844-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics