Skip to main content

Linguistic Sentiment Features for Newspaper Opinion Mining

  • Conference paper
Natural Language Processing and Information Systems (NLDB 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7934))

  • 2436 Accesses

Abstract

The sentiment in news articles is not created only through single words, also linguistic factors, which are invoked by different contexts, influence the opinion-bearing words. In this paper, we apply various commonly used approaches for sentiment analysis and expand research by analysing semantic features and their influence to the sentiment. We use a machine learning approach to learn from these features/influences and to classify the resulting sentiment. The evaluation is performed on two datasets containing over 4,000 German news articles and illustrates that this technique can increase the performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balahur, A., Steinberger, R., Kabadjov, M., Zavarella, V., van der Goot, E., Halkia, M., Pouliquen, B., Belyaeva, J.: Sentiment analysis in the news. In: Proc. of the 7th Intl. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carvalho, P., Sarmento, L., Silva, M.J., de Oliveira, E.: Clues for detecting irony in user-generated contents: oh..!! it’s “so easy”;-). In: Proc. of the 1st International CIKM Workshop on Topic-Sentiment Analysis for Mass Opinion, TSA 2009, pp. 53–56 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Church, K.W., Hanks, P.: Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. In: Proc. of the 27th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 1989, pp. 76–83 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ding, X., Liu, B., Yu, P.S.: A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. In: Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Web Search and Web Data Mining, WSDM 2008, pp. 231–240 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jia, L., Yu, C., Meng, W.: The effect of negation on sentiment analysis and retrieval effectiveness. In: Proc. of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2009, pp. 1827–1830 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaji, N., Kitsuregawa, M.: Building lexicon for sentiment analysis from massive collection of html documents. In: Proc. of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, EMNLP-CoNLL (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2(1-2), 1–135 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Remus, R., Quasthoff, U., Heyer, G.: SentiWS – a publicly available german-language resource for sentiment analysis. In: Proc. of the 7th Intl. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scholz, T., Conrad, S.: Integrating viewpoints into newspaper opinion mining for a media response analysis. In: Proc. of the 11th Conf. on Natural Language Processing, KONVENS 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scholz, T., Conrad, S., Hillekamps, L.: Opinion mining on a german corpus of a media response analysis. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds.) TSD 2012. LNCS, vol. 7499, pp. 39–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Scholz, T., Conrad, S., Wolters, I.: Comparing different methods for opinion mining in newspaper articles. In: Bouma, G., Ittoo, A., Métais, E., Wortmann, H. (eds.) NLDB 2012. LNCS, vol. 7337, pp. 259–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Watson, T., Noble, P.: Evaluating public relations: a best practice guide to public relations planning, research & evaluation. PR in practice series, ch. 6, pp. 107–138. Kogan Page (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou, L., Li, B., Gao, W., Wei, Z., Wong, K.-F.: Unsupervised discovery of discourse relations for eliminating intra-sentence polarity ambiguities. In: Proc. of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 162–171 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Scholz, T., Conrad, S. (2013). Linguistic Sentiment Features for Newspaper Opinion Mining. In: Métais, E., Meziane, F., Saraee, M., Sugumaran, V., Vadera, S. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Information Systems. NLDB 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7934. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38824-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38824-8_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38823-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38824-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics