The Architects’ Perspective on Enterprise Transformation: An Explorative Study

  • Nils Labusch
  • Felix Koebele
  • Stephan Aier
  • Robert Winter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 151)

Abstract

Enterprise architecture management (EAM) is considered to be a valuable means in order to support large-scale changes, called enterprise transformations (ET). In the study at hand we apply an explorative qualitative approach in order to investigate the potentials of EAM to support ETs by discussing the topic with highly knowledgeable informants that deal with EAM on a daily basis in nine different companies. The results reveal six propositions about the current and future state of EAM as an ET supporting discipline. The propositions reveal a distinction between IT and business focused EAM, means and activities taken by EAM to support ET, major pitfalls that need to be avoided as much as perceptions about the future of the discipline.

Keywords

enterprise transformation enterprise architecture management empirical study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tamm, T., Seddon, P.B., Shanks, G., Reynolds, P.: How Does Enterprise Architecture Add Value to Organisations? Communications of the Association for Information Systems 28, 141–168 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aier, S., Riege, C., Winter, R.: Unternehmensarchitektur – Literaturüberblick und Stand der Praxis. Wirtschaftsinformatik 50(4), 292–304 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lahrmann, G., Labusch, N., Winter, R., Uhl, A.: Management of Large-Scale Transformation Programs: State of the Practice and Future Potential. In: Aier, S., Ekstedt, M., Matthes, F., Proper, E., Sanz, J.L. (eds.) TEAR 2012 and PRET 2012. LNBIP, vol. 131, pp. 253–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rouse, W.B.: A Theory of Enterprise Transformation. Systems Engineering 8(4), 279–295 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buchta, D., Eul, M., Schulte-Croonenberg, H.: Strategic IT Management - Increase value, control performance, reduce costs. Gabler, Wiesbaden (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abraham, R., Aier, S., Labusch, N.: Enterprise Architecture as a Means for Coordination – An Empirical Study on Actual and Potential Practice. In: MCIS Proceedings, Paper 33 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malone, T.W., Crowston, K.: The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys 26(1), 87–119 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy. In: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pulkkinen, M., Naumenko, A., Luostarinen, K.: Managing information security in a business network of machinery maintenance services business - Enterprise architecture as a coordination tool. Journal of Systems and Software 80(10), 1607–1620 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Op’t Land, M., Proper, E., Waage, M., Cloo, J., Steghuis, C.: Enterprise Architecture - Creating Value by Informed Governance. Springer, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Asfaw, T., Bada, A., Allario, F.: Enablers and Challenges in Using Enterprise Architecture Concepts to Drive Transformation: Perspectives from Private Organizations and Federal Government Agencies. Journal of Enterprise Architecture 5(3), 18–28 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Radeke, F.: Toward Understanding Enterprise Architecture Management’s Role in Strategic Change: Antecedents, Processes, Outcomes. In: Wirtschaftinformatik Proceedings 2011, Paper 62 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rouse, W.B., Baba, M.L.: Enterprise transformation. Communications of the ACM 49(7), 67–72 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Basole, R.C.: Transforming Enterprises through Mobile Applications: A Multi-Phase Framework. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, NE (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kotnour, T., Bollo, T.R.: Strategic management of a transformation in a multi-program technology program involving convergence and divergence of programs: Observations from NASA. International Journal of Technology Management 53, 257–272 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Uhl, A., Gollenia, L.A. (eds.): A Handbook of Business Transformation Management Methodology. Gower Publishing, Farnham (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stiles, P., Uhl, A.: Meta Management: Connecting the Parts of Business Transformation. 360° – The Business Transformation Journal 3, 24–29 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Winter, K., Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Schweda, C.M.: Investigating the State-of-the-Art in Enterprise Architecture Management Methods in Literature and Practice. In: MCIS 2010 Proceedings, Paper 90 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Buckl, S., Ernst, A.M., Lankes, J., Matthes, F., Schweda, C.M.: State of the Art in Enterprise Architecture Management (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Matthes, F., Monahov, I., Schneider, A., Schulz, C.: EAM KPI Catalog v 1.0. Munich. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bernard, S.A.: An Introduction to Enterprise Architecture, 2nd edn. Authorhouse, Bloomington (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Foorthuis, R., van Steenbergen, M., Mushkudiani, N., Bruls, W., Brinkkemper, S., Bos, R.: On Course, but Not There Yet: Enterprise Architecture Conformance and Benefits in Systems Development. ICIS 2010 Proceedings, Paper 110 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ross, J.W., Weil, P.: Understanding the benefits of enterprise architecture, Cambridge, MA. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boh, W.F., Yellin, D.: Using Enterprise Architecture Standards in Managing Information Technology. Journal of Management Information Systems 23(3), 163–207 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    The Open Group: TOGAF Version 9.1 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen, Z., Pooley, R.: Requirement Analysis for Enterprise Information Systems - Developing an Ontological Meta-Model for Zackman Framework. In: ICIS 2009 Proceedings, Phoenix, AZ, Paper 182 (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Department of Defense: DoD Architecture Framework Version 2.02. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ifip-Ifac Task Force on Architectures for Enterprise Integration: GERAM - The Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology. In: Bernus, P., Nemes, L., Schmidt, G. (eds.): Handbook on Enterprise Architecture, pp. 22-63. Springer, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Labusch, N., Winter, R.: Towards a Conceptualization of Architectural Support for Enterprise Transformation. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) 2013, Utrecht, NL (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Winter, R., Townson, S., Uhl, A., Labusch, N., Noack, J.: Enterprise Architecture and Business Transformation: The Difference and Synergy Potential. 360° – The Business Transformation Journal (2012)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532–550 (1989)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E.: Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal 50(1), 25–32 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Reconstructing the Giant: On the Importance of Rigour in Documenting the Literature Search Process. In: Proceedings of the ECIS 2009, Verona, pp. 2206–2217 (2009)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the Past to prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly 26(2), 13–23 (2002)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schrader, U., Hennig-Thurau, T.: VHB-JOURQUAL2: Method, Results, and Implications of the German Academic Association for Business Research’s Journal Ranking. BuR - Business Research 2(2), 180–204 (2009)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Labusch, N., Winter, R.: Method Support of Large-Scale Transformation in the Insurance Sector: Exploring Foundations. In: Aier, S., Ekstedt, M., Matthes, F., Proper, E., Sanz, J.L. (eds.) TEAR 2012 and PRET 2012. LNBIP, vol. 131, pp. 60–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Burke, L.A., Miller, M.K.: Phone Interviewing as a Means of Data Collection: Lessons Learned and Practical Recommendations. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2(2), 1–8 (2001)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jick, T.D.: Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. Administrative Science Quarterly 24(4), 602–611 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Huber, G.P., Power, D.J.: Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal 6(2), 171–180 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bailey, K.D.: Typologies and Taxonomies: An Introduction to Classification Techniques. Sage University Papers Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1994)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Koch, T.: Post-Merger Integration. In: Picot, G. (ed.) Handbook of International Mergers and Acquisitions: Preparation, Implementation and Integration, pp. 271–291. Palgrave McMillan, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Robbins, S.S., Stylianou, A.C.: Post-merger systems integration: the impact on IS capabilities. Information & Management 36(4), 205–212 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wijnhoven, F., Spil, T., Stegwee, R., Fa, R.T.A.: Post-merger IT integration strategies: an IT alignment perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 15(1), 5–28 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Devine, T.: Replacing a Legacy System (2008)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bisbal, J., Lawless, D., Bing, W., Grimson, J., Wade, V., Richardson, R., O’Sullivan, D.: An overview of legacy information system migration. In: Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference and International Computer Science Conference (APSEC 1997 and ICSC 1997), pp. 529–530 (1997)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sneed, H.M.: Planning the reengineering of legacy systems. IEEE Software 12(1), 24–34 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Seacord, R.C., Plakosh, D., Lewis, G.A.: Modernizing Legacy Systems: Software Technologies, Engineering Processes, and Business Practices. Addison-Wesley Longman, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Comella-Dorda, S., Wallnau, K., Seacord, R., Robert, J.: A Survey of Black-Box Modernization Approaches for Information Systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, pp. 173–183 (2000)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Blosch, M., Burton, B.: Enterprise Architecture Leaders Focus on Business Impact (2012)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lacity, M.C., Khan, S.A., Willcocks, L.P.: A review of the IT outsourcing literature: Insights for practice. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 18(3), 130–146 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Baumöl, U.: Change Management in Organisationen: Situative Methodenkonstruktion für flexible Veränderungsprozesse. Gabler, Wiesbaden (2008)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Baumöl, U.: Strategic Agility through Situational Method Construction. In: Proceedings of the European Academy of Management Annual Conference 2005, München (2005)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The Anatomy of a Design Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(5), 312–335 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nils Labusch
    • 1
  • Felix Koebele
    • 1
  • Stephan Aier
    • 1
  • Robert Winter
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Information ManagementUniversity of St.GallenSt.GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations