Advertisement

Realization of Enterprise Architecture (EA) Benefits

A Meta Study on Control and Controllability
  • Haining Wan
  • Björn Johansson
  • Xueshan Luo
  • Sven Carlsson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 151)

Abstract

Realization of Enterprise Architecture (EA) benefits is a topic not well researched, despite the fact that EA has been in focus among both practitioners and researchers for many years. Based on a literature review and nine semi-structured interviews, this research investigates control and controllability in terms of measurability and traceability. The findings reveal that there are evident challenges in reality and the reason for such reality varies from one situation to another. The interviews suggest that hard ways/approaches, in terms of concrete technical ROI-related metrics, to measure and trace realization of EA benefits convincingly, quantitatively and effectively is still absent. It could be concluded that control and controllability concern not only technical issues, but also socio-political-cultural issues. This research contributes by revealing the many challenges in control of realization of EA benefits and by analyzing the ‘what and why’ of the reality.

Keywords

Enterprise Architecture Enterprise Architecture Benefits Control Controllability Measurability Traceability Enterprise Transformation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Guijarro, L.: Analysis of the interoperability frameworks in e-government initiatives. Electronic Government, pp. 36–39 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fond, E.N., Goldfine, A.H.: Information Management Directions: the Integration Challenge. Computer Systems Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology (1989)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boucharas, V., Van, M., Jansen, S.S., Brinkkemper, S.: The contribution of enterprise architecture to the achievement of organizational goals: Establishing the enterprise architecture benefits framework, Utrecht University (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chung, L., Song, H.K., Song, Y.T., Subramanian, N.: Understanding the role of enterprise architecture towards better institutionalization. In: 10th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligences, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, pp. 316–320. IEEE Computer Society Press, Daegu (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pereira, C.M., Sousa, P.: Enterprise architecture: business and IT alignment. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1344–1345. ACM, Santa Fe (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wegmann, A., Balabko, P., Lê, L.S., Regev, G., Rychkova, I.: A method and tool for business-IT alignment in enterprise architecture. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE Forum. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 161, pp. 113–118. CEUR-WS.org (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jensen, C.T., Cline, O., Owen, M.: Combining Business Process Management and Enterprise Architecture for Better Business Outcomes. IBM Corporation (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bernard, S.A.: An Introduction to Enterprise Architecture. AuthorHouse, Bloomington (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Steenbergen, M., Brinkkemper, S.: Modeling the Contribution of Enterprise Architecture Practice to the Achievement of Business Goals. In: Papadopoulos, G.A., Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, G., Wrycza, S., Zupancic, J. (eds.) Information Systems Development, pp. 609–618. Springer, US (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foorthuis, R.: Project Compliance with Enterprise Architecture. Utrecht University, Utrecht (2012) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saha, P.: A real options perspective to enterprise architecture as an investment activity. Journal of Enterprise Architecture 2, 32–52 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    US General Accounting Office: Information technology a framework for assessing and improving enterprise architecture management. DIANE PublishingGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tamm, T., Seddon, P.B., Shanks, G., Reynolds, P.: How Does Enterprise Architecture Add Value to Organisations? Communications of the Association for Information Systems 28, Article 10, 141–168 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Salmans, B., Kappelman, L.: The State of EA: Progress, Not Perfection. In: Kappelman, L.A. (ed.) The SIM Guide to Enterprise Architecture, pp. 165–217. CRC Press (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    van Steenbergen, M., Foorthuis, R., Mushkudiani, N., Bruls, W., Brinkkemper, S., Bos, R.: Achieving Enterprise Architecture Benefits: What Makes the Difference? In: 15th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), pp. 350–359. IEEE Computer Society, Helsinki (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van der Raadt, B., Bonnet, M., Schouten, S., van Vliet, H.: The relation between EA effectiveness and stakeholder satisfaction. Journal of Systems and Software 83, 1954–1969 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lagerstrom, R., Sommestad, T., Buschle, M., Ekstedt, M.: Enterprise architecture management’s impact on information technology success. In: 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE Computer Society (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Foorthuis, R., van Steenbergen, M., Mushkudiani, N., Bruls, W., Brinkkemper, S., Bos, R.: On course, but not there yet: Enterprise Architecture conformance and benefits in systems development. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Information Systems (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Buchanan, R.: Assessing enterprise architecture program value: Part 2: Business effective benefits. META Delta 128 (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boucharas, V., van Steenbergen, M., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: The Contribution of Enterprise Architecture to the Achievement of Organizational Goals: A Review of the Evidence. In: Proper, E., Lankhorst, M.M., Schönherr, M., Barjis, J., Overbeek, S. (eds.) TEAR 2010. LNBIP, vol. 70, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Espinosa, J.A., Wai Fong, B., DeLone, W.: The Organizational Impact of Enterprise Architecture: A Research Framework. In: 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE Computer Society, Hawaii (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rico, D.F.: A framwork for measuring ROI of enterprise architecture. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 18, 1–12 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Niemi, E.: Enterprise Architecture Benefits: Perceptions from Literature and Practice. In: The Proceedings of the 7th IBIMA Conference Internet & Information Systems in the Digital Age. International Business Information Management Association, Brescia (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Niemi, E., Pekkola, S.: Adapting the DeLone and McLean model for the enterprise architecture benefit realization process. In: 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, Hawaii (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lange, M., Mendling, J., Recker, J.: A Comprehensive EA Benefit Realization Model–An Exploratory Study. In: Proceedings of the 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4230–4239. IEEE Computer Society (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cane, S.: Measuring the impact of Enterprise Architecture. Issues in Information Systems 8, 437–442 (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goodhue, D.L., Thompson, R.L.: Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly 19, 213–236 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schelp, J., Stutz, M.: A Balanced Scorecard Approach to Measure the Value of Enterprise Architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture 3 (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Infosys: Inosys Enterprise Architecture Survey 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Obitz, T., Doddavula, S.K., Aziz, S.: Findings from the Enterprise Architecture Survey 2007 Executive summary (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lakhdissi, M., Bounabat, B.: Toward a novel methodology for IT Strategic Planning. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Managemant and Evaluation. Academic Conferences Limited, Toronto (2011)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hoogervorst, J.: Enterprise architecture: Enabling integration, agility and change. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 13, 213–233 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lange, M., Mendling, J.: An Experts’ Perspective on Enterprise Architecture Goals, Framework Adoption and Benefit Assessment. In: 15th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), pp. 304–313. IEEE Computer Society, Helsinki (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise architecture as strategy: creating a foundation for business execution. Harvard Business School, Boston (2006)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ross, J.: Maturity Matters: How Firms Generate Value From Enterprise Architecture. Research Briefing, CISR, Sloan School of Management, MIT 4 (2004)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rico, D.F.: Optimizing the ROI of enterprise architecture using real options. End User Computing Challenges and Technologies: Emerging Tools and Applications. IGI Global (2008)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Foorthuis, R., Hofman, F., Brinkkemper, S., Bos, R.: Compliance Assessments of Projects Adhering to Enterprise Architecture. Journal of Database Management (JDM) 23, 44–71 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Grigoriu, A.: An Enterprise Architecture Development Framework: The Business Case, Framework and Best Practices for Building Your Enterprise Architecture. Trafford on Demand Pub. (2006)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rodrigues, L.S., Amaral, L.: Issues in Enterprise Architecture Value. Journal of Enterprise Architecture 6, 27–32 (2010)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ylimäki, T.: Potential Critical Success Factors for Enterprise Architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture 2, 29–40 (2006)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zachman, J.A.: You Can’t ’Cost-Justify’ Architecture. DataToKnowledge Newsletter (Business Rule Solutions LLC) 29, 1–10 (2001)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Espinosa, J.A., Armour, F., Boh, W.F.: Coordination in enterprise architecting: an interview study. In: 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE Computer Society, Hawaii (2010)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bucher, T., Fischer, R., Kurpjuweit, S., Winter, R.: Analysis and Application Scenarios of Enterprise Architecture: An Exploratory Study. In: 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops. IEEE Computer Society, Hong Kong (2006)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Baker, J., Jones, D., Cao, Q., Song, J.: Conceptualizing the dynamic strategic alignment competency. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 12, 2 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haining Wan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Björn Johansson
    • 2
  • Xueshan Luo
    • 1
  • Sven Carlsson
    • 2
  1. 1.Key Lab of Information Systems EngineeringNational University of Defense TechnologyChangshaP.R. China
  2. 2.Department of Informatics, School of Economics and ManagementLund UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations