Numerical Simulation of Transport in Porous Media: Some Problems from Micro to Macro Scale

  • Quanji Cai
  • Sheema Kooshapur
  • Michael Manhart
  • Ralf-Peter Mundani
  • Ernst Rank
  • Andreas Springer
  • Boris Vexler
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering book series (LNCSE, volume 93)

Abstract

This paper deals with simulation of flow and transport in porous media such as transport of groundwater contaminants. We first discuss how macro scale equations are derived and which terms have to be closed by models. The transport of tracers is strongly influenced by pore scale velocity structure and large scale inhomogeneities in the permeability field. The velocity structure on the pore scale is investigated by direct numerical simulations of the 3D velocity field in a random sphere pack. The velocity probability density functions are strongly skewed, including some negative velocities. The large probability for very small velocities might be the reason for non-Fickian dispersion in the initial phase of contaminant transport. We present a method to determine large scale distributions of the permeability field from point-wise velocity measurements. The adjoint-based optimisation algorithm delivers fully satisfying agreement between input and estimated permeability fields. Finally numerical methods for convection dominated tracer transports are investigated from a theoretical point of view. It is shown that high order Finite Element Methods can reduce or even eliminate non-physical oscillations in the solution without introducing additional numerical diffusivity.

Keywords

Porous media Pore scale High order FEM Parameter identification 

References

  1. 1.
    Bear, J.: Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. American Elsevier Publishing Company, New York (1972)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becker, R., Vexler, B.: A posteriori error estimation for finite element discretization of parameter identification problems. Numer. Math. 96(3), 435–459 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Becker, R., Meidner, D., Vexler, B.: Efficient numerical solution of parabolic optimization problems by finite element methods. Optim. Methods Softw. 22(5), 813–833 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borges da Silva, E., Souza, D., Ulson de Souza, A., Guelli U. de Souza, S.: Prediction of effective diffusivity tensors for bulk diffusion with chemical reactions in porous media. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 24, 47–60 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braack, M.: Optimal control in fluid mechanics by finite elements with symmetric stabilization. SIAM J. Control Optim. 48(2), 672–687 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Braack, M., Schieweck, F.: Equal-order finite elements with local projection stabilization for the darcy-brinkman equations. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200(9–12), 1126–1136 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Breuer, M., Peller, N., Rapp, C., Manhart, M.: Flow over periodic hills – numerical and experimental study over a wide range of Reynolds numbers. Comput. Fluids 38, 433–457 (2009)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cai, Q., Kollmannsberger, S., Sala, E., Huerta, A., Rank, E.: On the natural stabilization of convection dominated problems using high order Bubnov-Galerkin finite elements. Comput. Math. Appl. (2013, submitted)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dentz, M., Cortis, A., Scher, H., Berkowitz, B.: Time behavior of solute transport in heterogeneous media: transition from anomalous to normal transport. Adv. Water Resour. 27, 155–173 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deurer, M., Vogeler, I., Clothier, B., Scotter, D.: Magnetic resonance imaging of hydrodynamic dispersion in a saturated porous medium. Transp. Porous Media 54, 145–166 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Donea, J., Huerta, A.: Finite Element Methods for Flow Problems. Wiley, Chichester/Hoboken (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Durlofsky, L.: Numerical calculation of equivalent grid block permeability tensors for heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour. Res. 27(5), 699–708 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ernst, O.: Residual-minimizing Krylov subspace methods for stabilized discretization of convection-diffusion equations. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 21, 1079–1101 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hassanizadeh, S.: On the transient non-Fickian dispersion theory. Transp. Porous Media 23, 107–124 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Himmelstoß, T.: Stabilisierung und Parameteridentifikation für die Darcy-Gleichungen. Master’s thesis, Technische Universität München (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hintermüller, M., Ito, K., Kunisch, K.: The primal-dual active set strategy as a semismooth Newton method. SIAM J. Optim. 13(3), 865–888 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hokpunna, A., Manhart, M.: Compact fourth-order finite volume method for numerical solutions of Navier-Stokes equations on staggered grids. J. Comput. Phys. 229, 7545–7570 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jenny, P., Tchelepi, H., Meyer, D.: Uncertainty assessment of transport in porous media based on a probability density function method. In: Proceedings of 10th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Amsterdam (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Juanes, R.: A variational multiscale finite element method for multiphase flow in porous media. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 41(7–8), 763–777 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Levy, M., Berkowitz, B.: Measurement and analysis of non-Fickian dispersion in heterogeneous porous media. J. Contam. Hydrol. 64, 203–226 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liakopoulos, A.: Darcy’s coefficient of permeability as symmetric tensor of second rank. Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. Bull. 10(3), 41–48 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mahnken, R., Steinmann, P.: A finite element algorithm for parameter identification of material models for fluid-saturated porous media. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 25(5), 415–434 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Manhart, M.: A zonal grid algorithm for DNS of turbulent boundary layers. Comput. Fluids 33(3), 435–461 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meyer, D., Jenny, P.: Stochastic mixing model for PDF simulations of turbulent reacting flow. In: Advances in Turbulence X, pp. 681–684. CIMNE, Barcelona (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meyer, D., Tchelepi, H., Jenny, P.: An eulerian joint velocity-concentration PDF method for solute dispersion in highly heterogeneous porous media. Geophys. Res. Abstr. 12, 5700 (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nowak, W., Schwede, R., Cirpca, O., Neuweiler, I.: Probability density functions of hydraulic head and velocity in three-dimensional heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour. Res. 44 (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peller, N.: Numerische simulation turbulenter Strömungen mit immersed boundaries. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Peller, N., Le Duc, A., Tremblay, F., Manhart, M.: High-order stable interpolations for immersed boundary methods. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 52, 1175–1193 (2006)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rank, E., Katz, C., Werner, H.: On the importance of the discrete maximum principle in transient analysis using finite element methods. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 19, 1771–1782 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schulz, V., Wittum, G.: Multigrid optimization methods for stationary parameter identification problems in groundwater flow. In: Multigrid Methods V. Volume 3 of the LCSE series, pp. 276–288. Springer, Berlin (1998)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Suciu, N., Radu, F., Prechtel, A., Knabner, P.: A coupled finite element-global random walk approach to advection-dominated transport in porous media with random hydraulic conductivity. Comput. Appl. Math. 246, 27–37 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Szabó, B., Babuška, I.: Finite Element Analysis. Wiley, New York (1991)MATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Szabó, B., Düster, A., Rank, E.: The p-version of the finite element method. Encycl. Comput. Mech. 1, 119–139 (2004)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tröltzsch, F.: Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations: Theory, Methods and Applications. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vexler, B.: Adaptive finite element methods for parameter identification problems. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Heidelberg, Naturwissenschaftlich-Mathematische Gesamtfakultät (2004)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Whitaker, S.: Flow in porous media I: a theoretical derivation of Darcy’s law. Transp. Porous Media 1(1), 3–25 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Williamson, J.: Low-storage Runge-Kutta schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 35(48) (1980)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yang, C., Samper, J.: A subgrid-scale stabilized finite element method for multicomponent reactive transport through porous media. Transp. Porous Media 78(1), 101–126 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Quanji Cai
    • 1
  • Sheema Kooshapur
    • 2
  • Michael Manhart
    • 2
  • Ralf-Peter Mundani
    • 1
  • Ernst Rank
    • 1
  • Andreas Springer
    • 3
  • Boris Vexler
    • 3
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Computation in Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and SurveyingTechnische Universität MünchenMünchenGermany
  2. 2.Fachgebiet HydromechanikTechnische Universität MünchenMünchenGermany
  3. 3.Lehrstuhl für Opimale Steuerung, Fakultät für MathematikTechnische Universität MünchenGarching b. MünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations