Classifications of Ontology Matching Techniques

  • Jérôme Euzenat
  • Pavel Shvaiko


Having defined what the matching problem and the process for solving it are, and before scrutinising further the details of matching techniques, we classify them from different standpoints. This should help better understanding these systems.


External Resource Matching Technique Formal Concept Analysis Linguistic Resource Ontology Match 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Batini, C., Lenzerini, M., Navathe, S.: A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Comput. Surv. 18(4), 323–364 (1986) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellahsene, Z., Bonifati, A., Rahm, E. (eds.): Schema Matching and Mapping. Data-Centric Systems and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2011) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Sci. Am. 284(5), 34–43 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouquet, P., Serafini, L., Zanobini, S.: Semantic coordination: a new approach and an application. In: Proc. 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Sanibel Island, FL, USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2870, pp. 130–145 (2003b) Google Scholar
  5. Choi, N., Song, I.-Y., Han, H.: A survey on ontology mapping. SIGMOD Rec. 35(3), 34–41 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Do, H.-H.: Schema matching and mapping-based data integration. PhD thesis, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany (2005) Google Scholar
  7. Doan, A.-H., Halevy, A.: Semantic integration research in the database community: a brief survey. AI Mag. 26(1), 83–94 (2005). Special issue on Semantic integration Google Scholar
  8. Doan, A., Halevy, A., Ives, Z.: Principles of Data Integration. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (2012). 497 pp. Google Scholar
  9. Ehrig, M.: Ontology Alignment: Bridging the Semantic Gap. Springer, New York (2007). 0-387-32805-X Google Scholar
  10. Ehrig, M., Sure, Y.: Ontology mapping—an integrated approach. In: Proc. 1st European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWS), Hersounisous, Greece. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3053, pp. 76–91 (2004) Google Scholar
  11. Flouris, G., Manakanatas, D., Kondylakis, H., Plexousakis, D., Antoniou, G.: Ontology change: classification and survey. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 23(2), 117–152 (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P.: Semantic matching. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 18(3), 265–280 (2003) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., Yatskevich, M.: S-Match: an algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching. In: Proc. 1st European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWS), Hersounisous, Greece. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3053, pp. 61–75 (2004) Google Scholar
  14. Hamdi, F., Safar, B., Reynaud, C., Zargayouna, H.: Alignment-based partitioning of large-scale ontologies. In: Guillet, F., Ritschard, G., Zighed, D.A., Briand, H. (eds.) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Management. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 292, pp. 251–269. Springer, Berlin (2010b) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology mapping: the state of the art. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 18(1), 1–31 (2003b) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kang, J., Naughton, J.: On schema matching with opaque column names and data values. In: Proc. 22nd International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 205–216 (2003) Google Scholar
  17. Kashyap, V., Sheth, A.: Semantic and schematic similarities between database objects: a context-based approach. VLDB J. 5(4), 276–304 (1996) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larson, J., Navathe, S., Elmasri, R.: A theory of attributed equivalence in databases with application to schema integration. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 15(4), 449–463 (1989) CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S.: Issues and approaches of database integration. Commun. ACM 41(5), 166–178 (1998) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.: A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB J. 10(4), 334–350 (2001) CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: A survey of schema-based matching approaches. J. Data Semant. IV, 146–171 (2005) Google Scholar
  22. Spiliopoulos, V., Vouros, G., Karkaletsis, V.: On the discovery of subsumption relations for the alignment of ontologies. J. Web Semant. 8(1), 69–88 (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wache, H., Voegele, T., Visser, U., Stuckenschmidt, H., Schuster, G., Neumann, H., Hübner, S.: Ontology-based integration of information—a survey of existing approaches. In: Proc. International Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing at the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Seattle, WA, USA, pp. 108–117 (2001) Google Scholar
  24. Zanobini, S.: Semantic coordination: the model and an application to schema matching. PhD thesis, University of Trento, Trento, Italy (2006) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jérôme Euzenat
    • 1
  • Pavel Shvaiko
    • 2
  1. 1.INRIA and LIGGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.Informatica Trentina SpA, while at Department of Engineering and Computer Science (DISI), University of Trento, while at Web of Data, Bruno Kessler Foundation - IRSTTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations