Methodology

  • Jérôme Euzenat
  • Pavel Shvaiko

Abstract

Ontology matching is an important operation in modern ontology engineering because of the heterogeneous environments in which ontologies are designed, developed and supposed to work. Methodologically, it is worthwhile to express relations between ontologies since this allows for: (i) working with small and self-sufficient modules, instead of monolithic ontologies, (ii) expressing the links between two versions of the same ontology, and thus, updating data from one ontology to another, or (iii) putting back an ontology in the context of an upper-level ontology, allowing it to become more consensual with other ontologies of that domain.

References

  1. Aguirre, J.L., Eckert, K., Euzenat, J., Ferrara, A., van Hage, W.R., Hollink, L., Meilicke, C., Nikolov, A., Ritze, D., Scharffe, F., Shvaiko, P., Šváb-Zamazal, O., Trojahn, C., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Cuenca Grau, B., Zapilko, B.: Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2012. In: Proc. 7th International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM) at the 11th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Boston, MA, USA, pp. 73–115 (2012) Google Scholar
  2. Clifton, C., Hausman, E., Rosenthal, A.: Experience with a combined approach to attribute matching across heterogeneous databases. In: Proc. 7th IFIP Conference on Database Semantics, Leysin, Switzerland, pp. 428–453 (1997) Google Scholar
  3. Corcho, Ó.: A Layered Declarative Approach to Ontology Translation with Knowledge Preservation. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005) Google Scholar
  4. d’Aquin, M., Motta, E.: Watson, more than a semantic web search engine. Semant. Web 2(1), 55–63 (2011) Google Scholar
  5. Euzenat, J., Le Duc, C.: Methodological guidelines for matching ontologies. In: Suárez Figueroa, M., Gómez Pérez, A., Motta, E., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, pp. 257–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). Chap. 12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Euzenat, J., Ehrig, M., Jentzsch, A., Mochol, M., Shvaiko, P.: Case-based recommendation of matching tools and techniques. Deliverable 1.2.2.2.1, Knowledge web (2006) Google Scholar
  7. Euzenat, J., Mocan, A., Scharffe, F.: Ontology alignments: an ontology management perspective. In: Hepp, M., De Leenheer, P., De Moor, A., Sure, Y. (eds.) Ontology Management: Semantic Web, Semantic Web Services, and Business Applications, pp. 177–206. Springer, New York (2008a). Chap. 6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huza, M., Harzallah, M., Trichet, F.: OntoMas: a tutoring system dedicated to ontology matching. In: Proc. 1st International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM) at the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Athens, GA, USA, pp. 228–323 (2006) Google Scholar
  9. Lambrix, P., Liu, Q.: Using partial reference alignments to align ontologies. In: Proc. 6th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Hersounisous, Greece. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5554, pp. 188–202 (2009) Google Scholar
  10. Mochol, M.: The methodology for finding suitable ontology matching approaches. PhD thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany (2009) Google Scholar
  11. Suárez-Figueroa, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Motta, E., Gangemi, A. (eds.): Ontology Engineering in a Networked World. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) Google Scholar
  12. Tordai, A.: On combining alignment techniques. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2012) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jérôme Euzenat
    • 1
  • Pavel Shvaiko
    • 2
  1. 1.INRIA and LIGGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.Informatica Trentina SpA, while at Department of Engineering and Computer Science (DISI), University of Trento, while at Web of Data, Bruno Kessler Foundation - IRSTTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations