• Jérôme Euzenat
  • Pavel Shvaiko


This chapter overviews the major ontology matching applications. These applications are presented from a technological point of view, such as ontology integration or linked data, rather than from an economic sector or a domain of interest point of view, such as biomedicine or electronic government. Ontology matching is an enabling operation spreading all domains of interest (running in heterogeneous settings).


Data Integration Global Schema Local Schema Query Interface Query Answering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aberer, K., Catarci, T., Cudré-Mauroux, P., Dillon, T., Grimm, S., Hacid, M.-S., Illarramendi, A., Jarrar, M., Kashyap, V., Mecella, M., Mena, E., Neuhold, E., Ouksel, A., Risse, T., Scannapieco, M., Saltor, F., De Santis, L., Spaccapietra, S., Staab, S., Studer, R., De Troyer, O.: Emergent semantics systems. In: Proc. 1st International Conference on Semantics of a Networked World (ICSNW), Paris, France. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3226, pp. 14–43 (2004a) Google Scholar
  2. Aberer, K., Cudré-Mauroux, P., Ouksel, A., Catarci, T., Hacid, M.-S., Illarramendi, A., Kashyap, V., Mecella, M., Mena, E., Neuhold, E., De Troyer, O., Risse, T., Scannapieco, M., Saltor, F., de Santis, L., Spaccapietra, S., Staab, S., Studer, R.: Emergent semantics principles and issues. In: Proc. 9th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA), Jeju Island, Korea. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2973, pp. 25–38 (2004b) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal, R., Srikant, R.: On integrating catalogs. In: Proc. 10th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), Hong Kong, China, pp. 603–612 (2001) Google Scholar
  4. Algergawy, A., Nayak, R., Siegmund, N., Köppen, V., Saake, G.: Combining schema and level-based matching for web service discovery. In: Proc. 10th International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE), Vienna, Austria, pp. 114–128 (2010) Google Scholar
  5. Atencia, M., Schorlemmer, M.: An interaction-based approach to semantic alignment. J. Web Semant. 13(1), 131–147 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atencia, M., Euzenat, J., Pirrò, G., Rousset, M.-C.: Alignment-based trust for resource finding in semantic P2P networks. In: Proc. 10th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Bonn, Germany. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7031, pp. 51–66 (2011) Google Scholar
  7. Bailin, S., Truszkowski, W.: Ontology negotiation: how agents can really get to know each other. In: Proc. 1st International Workshop on Radical Agent Concepts (WRAC), McLean, VA, USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2564, pp. 320–334 (2002) Google Scholar
  8. Batini, C., Lenzerini, M., Navathe, S.: A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Comput. Surv. 18(4), 323–364 (1986) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berners-Lee, T.: Linked-data design issues. W3C design issue document (2009).
  10. Bernstein, P., Rahm, E.: Data warehouse scenarios for model management. In: Proc. 19 International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER), Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1920, pp. 1–15 (2000) Google Scholar
  11. Bernstein, P., Giunchiglia, F., Kementsietsidis, A., Mylopoulos, J., Serafini, L., Zaihrayeu, I.: Data management for peer-to-peer computing: a vision. In: Proc. 5th International Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB), Madison, WI, USA (2002) Google Scholar
  12. Bouquet, P., Serafini, L., Zanobini, S.: Semantic coordination: a new approach and an application. In: Proc. 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Sanibel Island, FL, USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2870, pp. 130–145 (2003b) Google Scholar
  13. Bussler, C., Fensel, D., Mädche, A.: A conceptual architecture for semantic web enabled web services. SIGMOD Rec. 31(4), 24–29 (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cafarella, M., Halevy, A., Madhavan, J.: Structured data on the web. Commun. ACM 54(2), 72–79 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang, K.C.-C.: Deep-web search. In: Liu, L., Özsu, T. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Database Systems, pp. 784–788. Springer, Berlin (2009) Google Scholar
  16. Chang, K., He, B., Li, C., Patel, M., Zhang, Z.: Structured databases on the web: observations and implications. SIGMOD Rec. 33(3), 61–70 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chawathe, S., Garcia Molina, H., Hammer, J., Ireland, K., Papakonstantinou, Y., Ullman, J., Widom, J.: The TSIMMIS project: integration of heterogeneous information sources. In: Proc. 16th Meeting of the Information Processing Society of Japan (IPSJ), Tokyo, Japan, pp. 7–18 (1994) Google Scholar
  18. Chen, K., Kannan, A., Madhavan, J., Halevy, A.: Exploring schema repositories with Schemr. SIGMOD Rec. 40(1), 11–16 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coutaz, J., Crowley, J., Dobson, S., Garlan, D.: Context is key. Commun. ACM 48(3), 49–53 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dessloch, S., Hernández, M., Wisnesky, R., Radwan, A., Zhou, J.: Orchid: integrating schema mapping and ETL. In: Proc. 24th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Cancún, Mexico, pp. 1307–1316 (2008) Google Scholar
  21. Doan, A., Halevy, A., Ives, Z.: Principles of Data Integration. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (2012). 497 pp. Google Scholar
  22. Draper, D., Halevy, A., Weld, D.: The nimble integration engine. In: Proc. 20th International Conference on Management of Data SIGMOD, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, pp. 567–568 (2001) Google Scholar
  23. Dzbor, M., Domingue, J., Motta, E.: Magpie—towards a semantic web browser. In: Proc. 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Sanibel Island, FL, USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2870, pp. 690–705 (2003) Google Scholar
  24. Dzbor, M., Motta, E., Domingue, J.: Opening up Magpie via semantic services. In: Proc. 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Hiroshima, Japan. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3298, pp. 635–649 (2004) Google Scholar
  25. Elmagarmid, A., Rusinkiewicz, M., Sheth, A. (eds.): Management of Heterogeneous and Autonomous Database Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999) Google Scholar
  26. Euzenat, J., Laera, L., Tamma, V., Viollet, A.: Negotiation/argumentation techniques among agents complying to different ontologies. Deliverable 2.3.7, Knowledge web NoE (2005) Google Scholar
  27. Euzenat, J., Pierson, J., Ramparani, F.: Dynamic context management for pervasive applications. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 23(1), 21–49 (2008b) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fensel, D., Lausen, H., Polleres, A., de Bruijn, J., Stollberg, M., Roman, D., Domingue, J.: Enabling Semantic Web Services: the Web Service Modeling Ontology. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) Google Scholar
  29. FIPA: FIPA ACL communicative act library specification. Technical report, FIPA (2002a).
  30. FIPA: FIPA ACL message structure specification. Technical report, FIPA (2002b).
  31. Gene Ontology Consortium: The Gene Ontology project in 2008. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D440–D444 (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Giunchiglia, F., Zaihrayeu, I.: Making peer databases interact—a vision for an architecture supporting data coordination. In: Proc. 6th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents (CIA), Madrid, Spain, pp. 18–35 (2002) Google Scholar
  33. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., Yatskevich, M.: Semantic schema matching. In: Proc. 13rd International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS), Agia Napa, Cyprus. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3761, pp. 347–365 (2005a) Google Scholar
  34. Giunchiglia, F., McNeill, F., Yatskevich, M.: Web service composition via semantic matching of interaction specifications. Technical Report DIT-06-080, University of Trento (2006b) Google Scholar
  35. Gridinoc, L., Sabou, M., d’Aquin, M., Dzbor, M., Motta, E.: Semantic browsing with PowerMagpie. In: Proc. 5th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Tenerife, Spain. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5021, pp. 802–806 (2008) Google Scholar
  36. Haase, P., Schnizler, B., Broekstra, J., Ehrig, M., van Harmelen, F., Menken, M., Mika, P., Plechawski, M., Pyszlak, P., Siebes, R., Staab, S., Tempich, C.: Bibster—a semantics-based bibliographic peer-to-peer system. J. Web Semant. 2(1), 99–103 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Halevy, A., Ashish, N., Bitton, D., Carey, M., Draper, D., Pollock, J., Rosenthal, A., Sikka, V.: Enterprise information integration: successes, challenges and controversies. In: Proc. 24th International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), Baltimore, MD, USA, pp. 778–787 (2005) Google Scholar
  38. Hartung, M., Groß, A., Rahm, E.: COntoDiff: generation of complex evolution mappings for life science ontologies. J. Biomed. Inform. 46(1), 15–32 (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. He, B., Patel, M., Zhang, Z., Chang, K.C.-C.: Accessing the deep web. Commun. ACM 50(5), 94–101 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heath, T., Bizer, C.: Linked Data: Evolving the Web Into a Global Data Space. Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael (2011) Google Scholar
  41. Ichise, R., Takeda, H., Honiden, S.: Integrating multiple Internet directories by instance-based learning. In: Proc. 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 22–30 (2003) Google Scholar
  42. Ives, Z., Halevy, A., Mork, P., Tatarinov, I.: Piazza: mediation and integration infrastructure for semantic web data. J. Web Semant. 1(2), 155–175 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jung, J., Euzenat, J.: Towards semantic social networks. In: Proc. 4th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Innsbruck, Austria. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4519, pp. 267–280 (2007) Google Scholar
  44. Kirsten, T., Groß, A., Hartung, M., Rahm, E.: GOMMA: a component-based infrastructure for managing and analyzing life science ontologies and their evolution. J. Biomed. Semant. 2(6), 1–24 (2011) Google Scholar
  45. Laera, L., Tamma, V., Euzenat, J., Bench-Capon, T., Payne, T.: Reaching agreement over ontology alignments. In: Proc. 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Athens, GA, USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4273, pp. 371–384 (2006) Google Scholar
  46. Lenzerini, M.: Data integration: a theoretical perspective. In: Proc. 21st Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS), Madison, WI, USA, pp. 233–246 (2002) Google Scholar
  47. Lopez, V., Pasin, M., Motta, E.: AquaLog: an ontology-portable question answering system for the semantic web. In: Proc. 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Hersounisous, Greece. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3532, pp. 546–562 (2005) Google Scholar
  48. Lopez, V., Motta, E., Uren, V.: PowerAqua: fishing the semantic web. In: Proc. 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Budva, Montenegro. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4011, pp. 393–410 (2006) Google Scholar
  49. McNeill, F.: Dynamic ontology refinement. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (2006) Google Scholar
  50. Medjahed, B., Bouguettaya, A.: A multilevel composability model for semantic web services. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17(7), 954–968 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mena, E., Kashyap, V., Sheth, A., Illarramendi, A.: Observer: an approach for query processing in global information systems based on interoperability between pre-existing ontologies. In: Proc. 4th International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS), Brussels, Belgium, pp. 14–25 (1996) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Montanelli, S., Castano, S.: Semantically routing queries in peer-based systems: the H-Link approach. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 23(1), 51–72 (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Montanelli, S., Bianchini, D., Aiello, C., Baldoni, R., Bolchini, C., Bonomi, S., Castano, S., Catarci, T., De Antonellis, V., Ferrara, A., Melchiori, M., Quintarelli, E., Scannapieco, M., Schreiber, F., Tanca, L.: The ESTEEM platform: enabling P2P semantic collaboration through emerging collective knowledge. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 167–195 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Musen, M., Noy, N., Shah, N., Whetzel, P., Chute, C., Story, M.-A., Smith, B.: The national center for biomedical ontology. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 19(2), 190–195 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nejdl, W., Wolf, B., Qu, C., Decker, S., Sintek, M., Naeve, A., Nilsson, M., Palmér, M., Risch, T.: EDUTELLA: a P2P networking infrastructure based on RDF. In: Proc. 11th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), Honolulu, HA, USA, pp. 604–615 (2002) Google Scholar
  56. Nezhad, H.M., Xu, G.Y., Benatallah, B.: Protocol-aware matching of web service interfaces for adapter development. In: Proc. 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), Raleigh, NC, USA, pp. 731–740 (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Noy, N., Klein, M.: Ontology evolution: not the same as schema evolution. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 6(4), 428–440 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Noy, N., Musen, M.: PromptDiff: a fixed-point algorithm for comparing ontology versions. In: Proc. 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Edmonton, Canada, pp. 744–750 (2002b) Google Scholar
  59. Noy, N., Musen, M.: Ontology versioning in an ontology management framework. IEEE Intell. Syst. 19(4), 6–13 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oundhakar, S., Verma, K., Sivashanugam, K., Sheth, A., Miller, J.: Discovery of web services in a multi-ontology and federated registry environment. Int. J. Web Serv. Res. 2(3), 1–32 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Özsu, M.T., Valduriez, P.: Principles of Distributed Database Systems, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) Google Scholar
  62. Paolucci, M., Kawamura, T., Payne, T., Sycara, K.: Semantic matching of web services capabilities. In: Proc. 1st International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Chia Laguna, Italy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2342, pp. 333–347 (2002) Google Scholar
  63. Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S.: Issues and approaches of database integration. Commun. ACM 41(5), 166–178 (1998) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Robertson, D., Giunchiglia, F., van Harmelen, F., Marchese, M., Sabou, M., Schorlemmer, M., Shadbolt, N., Siebes, R., Sierra, C., Walton, C., Dasmahapatra, S., Dupplaw, D., Lewis, P., Yatskevich, M., Kotoulas, S., de Pinninck, A.P., Loizou, A.: Open knowledge semantic webs through peer-to-peer interaction. Technical Report DIT-06-034, University of Trento (2006) Google Scholar
  65. Roddick, J.: A survey of schema versioning issues for database systems. Inf. Softw. Technol. 37(7), 383–393 (1995) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rousset, M.-C., Adjiman, P., Chatalic, P., Goasdoué, F., Simon, L.: Somewhere in the semantic web. In: Proc. 32nd International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SofSem), Merin, Czech Republic. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3831, pp. 84–99 (2006) Google Scholar
  67. Sabou, M., Lopez, V., Motta, E.: Ontology selection for the real semantic web: how to cover the Queen birthday dinner? In: Proc. 15th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW), Praha, Czech Republic. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4248, pp. 96–111 (2006) Google Scholar
  68. Scharffe, F., Euzenat, J.: Linked data meets ontology matching: enhancing data linking through ontology alignments. In: Proc. 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development (KEOD), Paris, France, pp. 279–284 (2011) Google Scholar
  69. Schulten, E., Akkermans, H., Botquin, G., Dorr, M., Guarino, N., Lopes, N., Sadeh, N.: Call for participants: the e-commerce product classification challenge. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16(4), 86–c3 (2001) Google Scholar
  70. Seligman, L., Mork, P., Halevy, A., Smith, K., Carey, M., Chen, K., Wolf, C., Madhavan, J., Kannan, A., Burdick, D.: OpenII: an open source information integration toolkit. In: Proc. 29th International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), Indianapolis, IN, USA, pp. 1057–1060 (2010) Google Scholar
  71. Shadbolt, N., O’Hara, K., Salvadores, M., Alani, H.: EGovernment. In: Domingue, J., Fensel, D., Hendler, J. (eds.) Handbook of Semantic Web Technologies, pp. 840–900. Springer, Berlin (2011) Google Scholar
  72. Sheth, A., Larson, J.: Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Comput. Surv. 22(3), 183–236 (1990) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shvaiko, P., Giunchiglia, F., Schorlemmer, M., McNeill, F., Bundy, A., Marchese, M., Yatskevich, M., Zaihrayeu, I., Ho, B., Lopez, V., Sabou, M., Abian, J., Siebes, R., Kotoulas, S.: Dynamic ontology matching: a survey. Deliverable 3.1, OpenKnowledge (2006) Google Scholar
  74. Shvaiko, P., Farazi, F., Maltese, V., Ivanyukovich, A., Rizzi, V., Ferrari, D., Ucelli, G.: Trentino government linked open geo-data: a case study. In: Proc. 11th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Boston, MA, USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7650, pp. 196–211 (2012) Google Scholar
  75. Smith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W., Goldberg, L., Eilbeck, K., Ireland, A., Mungall, C., Leontis, N., Rocca-Serra, P., Ruttenberg, A., Sansone, S.-A., Scheuermann, R., Shah, N., Whetzel, P., Lewis, S.: The OBO foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1251–1255 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Spaccapietra, S., Parent, C.: Conflicts and correspondence assertions in interoperable databases. SIGMOD Rec. 20(4), 49–54 (1991) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Staab, S., Stuckenschmidt, H. (eds.): Semantic Web and Peer-to-Peer. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) Google Scholar
  78. Suarez Meza, L.J., Potosi, L.A.R., Corrales, J.C., Steller, L.A.: Service discovery in ubiquitous computing environments. In: Proc. 6th International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services (ICIW), St. Maarten, The Netherlands, pp. 1–9 (2011) Google Scholar
  79. Taheriyan, M., Knoblock, C., Szekely, P., Ambite, J.L.: Rapidly integrating services into the linked data cloud. In: Proc. 11th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Boston, MA, USA. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7649, pp. 559–574 (2012) Google Scholar
  80. Trojahn, C., Euzenat, J., Tamma, V., Payne, T.: Argumentation for reconciling agent ontologies. In: Elai, A., Kona, M., Orgun, M. (eds.) Semantic Agent Systems, pp. 89–111. Springer, New York (2011). Chap. 5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vaccari, L., Shvaiko, P., Marchese, M.: A geo-service semantic integration in spatial data infrastructures. Int. J. Spat. Data Infrastruct. Res. 4, 24–51 (2009) Google Scholar
  82. van Eijk, R., de Boer, F., van de Hoek, W., Meyer, J.-J.: On dynamically generated ontology translators in agent communication. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 16(5), 587–607 (2001) CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  83. van Gendt, M., Isaac, A., van der Meij, L., Schlobach, S.: Semantic web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections: a case study. In: Proc. 10th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL), Alicante, Spain, pp. 426–437 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vargas-Vera, M., Motta, E.: AQUA: ontology-based question answering system. In: Proc. 3rd Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (MICAI), Mexico, Mexico, pp. 468–477 (2004) Google Scholar
  85. Wache, H., Voegele, T., Visser, U., Stuckenschmidt, H., Schuster, G., Neumann, H., Hübner, S.: Ontology-based integration of information—a survey of existing approaches. In: Proc. International Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing at the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Seattle, WA, USA, pp. 108–117 (2001) Google Scholar
  86. Wang, J., Gasser, L.: Mutual online ontology alignment. In: Proc. Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems (OAS) at the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), Bologna, Italy (2002) Google Scholar
  87. Wiesman, F., Roos, N., Vogt, P.: Automatic ontology mapping for agent communication. In: Proc. 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), Bologna, Italy, pp. 563–564 (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zaihrayeu, I.: Towards peer-to-peer information management systems. PhD thesis, University of Trento, Trento, Italy (2006) Google Scholar
  89. Zhdanova, A., Krummenacher, R., Henke, J., Fensel, D.: Community-driven ontology management: DERI case study. In: Proc. 4th International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI), Compiegne, France, pp. 73–79 (2005) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jérôme Euzenat
    • 1
  • Pavel Shvaiko
    • 2
  1. 1.INRIA and LIGGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.Informatica Trentina SpA, while at Department of Engineering and Computer Science (DISI), University of Trento, while at Web of Data, Bruno Kessler Foundation - IRSTTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations