Advertisement

Understanding Risks Associated with Offshore Hydrocarbon Development

  • Kamrul Hossain
  • Timo Koivurova
  • Gerald Zojer
Chapter

Abstract

Arctic sea ice is rapidly reducing due to climatic changes occurring in the region, allowing for easier access to vast amounts of undiscovered oil and gas resources. In recent years, growing interest in exploitation of Arctic hydrocarbon resources has led to an increase in exploration activity. Nevertheless, because of the Arctic’s harsh conditions, activities remain costly and are linked to serious environmental risks for vulnerable and unique Arctic ecosystems. Clean-up of potential oil spills would be highly complicated, if not impossible, and routine operational activities connected to hydrocarbon development, such as drilling or increased shipping traffic, have adverse consequences on marine flora and fauna. This chapter examines past, current, and potential future hydrocarbon activities in the Arctic, associated environmental impacts from accidents as well as normal operations, and possible cooperation between the European Union (EU) and United States (US) in mitigating the adverse environmental consequences of oil and gas development. Possibilities for transatlantic cooperation regarding hydrocarbon development in the Arctic are considered, including the use of legal and institutional frameworks to which both the EU and US have commitments.

Keywords

European Union International Energy Agency Bowhead Whale Arctic Council Arctic Climate Impact Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. ACIA (2004) Impacts of a Warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. ADNR (2009) Beaufort Sea area wide oil and gas lease sale: Final finding of the Director. Alaska Department of Natural Resources. 9 Nov 2009Google Scholar
  3. Arctic SAR Agreement (2011) Agreement on Cooperation on Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue in the Arctic, 12 May 2011, 50 I.L.M. 1119 (2011). Entered into force on 19 Jan 2013Google Scholar
  4. Airoldi A (2010) The European Union and the Arctic. Main developments July 2008–2010. Nordic Council of Ministers, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  5. AMAP (1997) Arctic Pollution Issues: a State of the Arctic Environment Report. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, OsloGoogle Scholar
  6. AMAP (2002) Arctic Pollution Issues: a State of the Arctic Environment Report. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, OsloGoogle Scholar
  7. AMAP (2007) Arctic Oil and Gas 2007. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, OsloGoogle Scholar
  8. AMAP (2010) Assessment 2007: Oil and Gas Activities in the Arctic: Effects and Potential Effects, vol 1. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, OsloGoogle Scholar
  9. AMAP (2011) Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA). Executive Summary. Oslo: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme. <http://amap.no/swipa/SWIPA2011ExecutiveSummaryV2.pdf>. Accessed 6 Aug 2011
  10. AOGCC (2012) Alaska Average Daily Oil and NGL Production Rates. Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, Alaska Department of Administration. <http://doa.alaska.gov/ogc/ActivityCharts/Production/2012_09-ProdChart.pdf>. Accessed 8 Nov 2012
  11. Arctic MOPPR Agreement (2013) Agreement on Cooperation on Marine Oil Pollution Preparedness and Response in the Arctic, scheduled to be signed at the Arctic Council’s Ministerial Meeting in Kiruna, May 2013Google Scholar
  12. Belanger M, Tan L, Askin N, Wittnich C (2010) Chronological effects of the Deepwater Horizon Gulf of Mexico oil spill on regional seabird casualties. J Marine Animals Ecology 3(2):10–14Google Scholar
  13. Bird KJ, Charpentier RR, Gautier DL, Houseknecht DW, Klett TR, Pitman JK, Moore TE, Schenk CJ, Tennyson ME, Wandrey CJ (2008) Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal: Estimates of Undiscovered Oil and Gas North of the Arctic Circle. U.S. Geological Survey, Fact Sheet 2008–3049Google Scholar
  14. BMP (2011) Report to Inatsisartut on mineral resource activities in Greenland. Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum. <http://www.bmp.gl/images/stories/about_bmp/publications/Report_to_inatsisartut_on_mineral_reousrce_activities_in_2011.pdf>. Accessed 13 June 2012
  15. BMP (2012) Report to Inatsisartut, the Parliament of Greenland, concerning mineral resources activities in Greenland. Bureau of Minerals and PetroleumGoogle Scholar
  16. Boertmann D, Aastrup P (2002) Impacts on Mammals. In A. Mosbech (Ed.), Potential environmental impacts of oil spills in Greenland. An assessment of information status and research needs.(pp 113–117). NERI (National Environmental Research Institute), Technical Report 415Google Scholar
  17. BP (2012) Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2012. <http://www.bp.com/statisticalreview>. Accessed 27 July 2012
  18. JPC Canada-US (2003) Canada-United States joint marine pollution contingency plan, Revised 2003. <http://www.nrt.org/production/NRT/NRTWeb.nsf/AllAttachmentsByTitle/A-403CANUSJCPEnglish/$File/CANUS%20JCP%20English.pdf?OpenElement>
  19. JPC US-Russia (1989) Agreement between the government of the United States of America and the government of the union of soviet socialist republics concerning cooperation in combating pollution in the Bering and Chukchi Seas in emergency situations, with joint contingency plan against pollution in the Bering and Chukchi. Agreement, Moscow, 11 May 1989. Plan, London, 17 Oct 1989. TIAS 11446Google Scholar
  20. Carpenter B (2009) Warm is the new cold: global warming, oil, UNCLOS Article76, and how an Arctic treaty might stop a new Cold War. Environ Law Rev 39(1):215–252Google Scholar
  21. Casper KN (2009) Oil and Gas Development in the Arctic: Softening of Ice Demands Hardening of International Law. Nat Res J 49(3/4):825–882Google Scholar
  22. Chazan G (2012) 31 Aug Gazprom puts Shtokman project on ice. Financial Times. <http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/604b9b38-f359-11e1-9ca6-00144feabdc0.html>. Accessed 3 Oct 2012
  23. CNLOPB (2011) Annual Report 2010/2011. Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum BoardGoogle Scholar
  24. OPRC Convention (1990) International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response, and Cooperation, 30 Nov 1990. 30 I.L.M. 733 (1991). Entered into force 13 May 1995Google Scholar
  25. EIA (2012) Annual Energy Outlook 2012. US Energy Information Administration. DOE/EIA-0383(2012)Google Scholar
  26. EIA (n.d.) 25th Anniversary of the 1973 oil Embargo. US Energy Information A dministration. <http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/25opec/anniversary.html>. Accessed 5 Feb 2013
  27. Emmerson C, Lahn G (2012) Arctic Opening: Opportunity and Risk in the High North. Chatham House, Lloyd’s. <http://www.lloyds.com/news-and-insight/risk-insight/reports/arctic-report-2012>. Accessed 6 Feb 2013
  28. Eni Norge (n.d.) Field development facts. <http://www.eninorge.com/en/Field-development/Goliat/Facts>. Accessed 26 Aug 2012
  29. EPPR (1998) Field Guide for Oil Spill Response in Arctic Water. <http://eppr.arctic-council.org/content/fldguide/index.html>. Accessed 09 Aug 2011
  30. Espoo Convention (1991) Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, 25 Feb 1989, 1989 U.N.T.S. 309. Entered into force 10 Sept 1997Google Scholar
  31. Gautier DL, Bird KJ, Charpentier RR, Grantz A, Houseknecht DW, Klett TR, Moore TE, Pitman JK, Schenk CJ, Schuenemeyer JH, Sørensen K, Tennyson ME, Valin ZC, Wandreym CJ (2009) Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas in the Arctic. Science 324(59321):1175–1179. doi: 10.1126/science.1169467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Greenpeace (2010) The risks and potential impacts of oil exploration in the Arctic. Media Briefing, Apr 23. <http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/files/pdfs/climate/arctic_briefing_gp.pdf>. Accessed 09 Aug 2011
  33. Hong N (2012) The energy factor in the Arctic dispute: A pathway to conflict or cooperation? J World Energy Law Bus 5(1):13–26. doi: 10.1039/jwelb/jwr023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hossain K (2010) International Governance in the Arctic: The Law of the Sea Convention with a Special Focus on Offshore Oil and Gas. In G. Aflredsson, T. Koivurova (Ed.), Yearbook of Polar Law, 2, 139–169Google Scholar
  35. IEA (2010a) Oil and Gas Security. Emergency Response of IEA countries: Canada. <http://www.iea.org/papers/security/canada_2010.pdf>. Accessed 13 June 2012
  36. IEA (2010b) World Energy Outlook 2010. International Energy Agency, Paris OECD/IEAGoogle Scholar
  37. IEA (2011a) World Energy Outlook 2011. Executive Summary. Paris: OECD/IEA. <http://www.iea.org/Textbase/npsum/weo2011sum.pdf>. Accessed 13 June 2012
  38. IEA (2011b) Oil and Gas Security. Emergency Response of IEA Countries: Norway. <http://www.iea.org/papers/security/Norway_2011.pdf>. Accessed 13 June 2012
  39. Ilulissat Declaration (2008) Arctic Ocean Conference. Ilulissat, Greenland. 27 May 2008, 48 I.L.M. 382 (2009)Google Scholar
  40. Jerome D, Hossain K, Koivurova T (2009) Canadian Arctic Offshore Oil and Natural Gas and European Union Energy Diversification: Towards a New Perspective? In T. Koivurova, A. Chircop, E. Franckx, E.J. Molenaar and D.L. VanderZwaag (Eds.), Understanding and strengthening European union-Canada relations in law of the sea and ocean governance. Juridica Lapponica, 35 (227–251), University of Lapland Printing Centre, RovaniemiGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaczynski V, Brosnan M (2008) Management of Arctic Resources: Economic, Environmental, Legal and Policy Considerations. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on globalization, energy and environment, Warsaw School of Economics, May 29–30, 2008Google Scholar
  42. Koivurova T, Hossain K (2008) Background Paper: Offshore Hydrocarbon––Current Policy Context in the Marine Arctic. Arctic transformGoogle Scholar
  43. Krauss C (2012) Shell Delays Arctic Oil Drilling Until 2013. New York Times, 17 Sept. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/18/business/global/shell-delays-arctic-oil-drilling-until-next-year.html>. Accessed 31 Oct 2012
  44. Lesikhina N, Rudaya I, Kireeva A, Krivonos O, Kobets E (2007) Offshore Oil and Gas Development in Northwest Russia: Consequences and Implications. Bellona. <http://www.bellona.org/reports/report/russian_arctic_shelf>. Accessed 15 Nov 2012
  45. Maltrud M, Peacock S, Visbeck M (2010) On the possible long-term fate of oil released in the Deepwater Horizon incident, estimated using ensembles of dye release simulations. Environ Res Lett 5(3):035301. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/035301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCracken AD, Poulton TP, Macey E, Monro Gray JM, Nowlan GS (2007) Arctic Oil and Gas. Geological Association of Canada. <http://www.gac.ca/PopularGeoscience/factsheets/ArcticOilandGas_e.pdf>. Accessed 4 July 2012
  47. Montevecchi W, Fifield D, Burke C, Garthe S, Hedd A, Rail JF, Robertson G (2012) Tracking long-distance migration to assess marine pollution impact. Biol Lett 8(2):218–221. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mosbech A (2002) Impacts of oil spill on fish. In: A. Mosbech (ed.), Potential environmental impacts of oil spills in Greenland. An assessment of information status and research needs. (pp 79–92) NERI (National Environmental Research Institute), Technical Report 415Google Scholar
  49. Muhling BA, Roffer MA, Lamkin JT, Ingram GW, Upton MA, Gawlikowksi G, Muller-Karger F, Habtes S, Richards WJ (2012) Overlap between Atlantic bluefin tuna spawning grounds and observed Deepwater Horizon surface oil in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar Pollut Bull 64:679–687. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.01.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. NEB (2012a) Estimated Production of Canadian Crude Oil and Equivalent. National Energy Board. <http://www.neb.gc.ca/clf-nsi/rnrgynfmtn/sttstc/crdlndptrlmprdct/stmtdprdctn-eng.html>. Accessed 14 Nov 2012
  51. NEB (2012b) Marketable Natural Gas Production in Canada. National Energy Board. <http://www.neb.gc.ca/clf-nsi/rnrgynfmtn/sttstc/mrktblntrlgsprdctn/mrktblntrlgsprdctn-eng.html>. Accessed 14 Nov 2012
  52. NRC (2003) Cumulative Environmental Effects of Oil and Gas activities on Alaska’s North slope. National Research Council: National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  53. NSIDC (2012) Press Release: Arctic sea ice shatters previous low records; Antarctic sea ice edges to record high. National Snow and Ice Data Center. <http://nsidc.org/news/press/20121002_MinimumPR.html>. Accessed 30 Oct 2012
  54. OGP (2002) Oil and gas exploration and production in arctic offshore regions. Guidelines for environmental protection. Report No. 2.84/329. International Association of Oil and Gas ProducersGoogle Scholar
  55. OSPAR Commission (2007) Annual Report of the OSPAR Commission 2006/07Google Scholar
  56. PAME (2009) Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Guidelines. Last updated 29 Apr 2009Google Scholar
  57. Pedersen S (2012) Shell’s Arctic Drilling Mission Begins Without Oil Recovery Vessel. The international, 15 July. <http://www.theinternational.org/articles/221-shells-arctic-drilling-mission-begins-wi>. Accessed 13 Aug 2012
  58. Pettersen T (2012) More delays at Prirazlomnoye. Barents Observer, 24 May. <http://barentsobserver.com/en/energy/more-delays-prirazlomnoye>. Accessed 16 June 2012
  59. Pew Environment Group (n.d.) Oil Spills. Oceans North. <http://www.oceansnorth.org/oil-spills>. Accessed 6 Feb 2013
  60. Piepul R (2001) Northstar field begins producing through first subsea Arctic pipeline. Oil Gas J. <http://www.ogj.com/articles/2001/11/northstar-field-begins-producing-through-first-subsea-arctic-pipeline.html>. Accessed 27 Oct 2012
  61. Rottem SV, Moe A (2007) Climate Change in the North and the Oil Industry. Input to Strategic Impact Assessment. Barents region 2030. Fridtjof Nansens Institute Report 9/2007Google Scholar
  62. SLR (2011) Spill Response Gap Study for the Canadian Beaufort Sea and the Canadian Davis Strait. SL Ross Environmental Research Limited, National Energy Board. <https://www.neb-one.gc.ca/ll-eng/livelink.exe?func=ll&objId=702903&objAction=Open>. Accessed 10 Nov 2012
  63. Watkins E (2012) CGES: Russia’s 2011 output sets new post-Soviet production record. Oil Gas J 110(1b), 17–18Google Scholar
  64. Weber B (2011) Arctic oil spill cleanup impossible one day in five: energy board report. The globe and mail. <http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/arctic-oil-spill-cleanup-impossible-one-day-in-five-energy-board-report/article2116242/>. Accessed 9 Aug 2011
  65. Wolf E (2007) Oil and water. The Arctic Seas Face Irreversible Damage. Earth I J, 22(2)Google Scholar
  66. Young OR, Einarsson N (2004) Introduction. In: AHDR (Arctic Human Development Report. Steffanson Arctic Institute, Akureyri, pp 15–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arctic Centre, University of LaplandRovaniemiFinland

Personalised recommendations