Skip to main content

Spotting Terminology Deficiencies in Process Model Repositories

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 147))

Abstract

Thinking in business processes and using process models for their documentation has become common practice in companies. In many cases this documentation encompasses more than thousands of models. One of the key challenges is achieving consistency of the process model terminology. Especially, the usage of synonym and homonym words is one of the most severe problems for terminological consistency. Therefore, this paper presents an automatic approach to identify synonym and homonym words in model repositories. We challenged the approach against three model collection from practice that are assumed to have different levels of terminological consistency. The evaluation shows that the approach is capable to fulfill these goals and to identify meaningful synonym and homonym candidates for follow-up resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, J., Rosemann, M., von Uthmann, C.: Guidelines of Business Process Modeling. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 30–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, R.: ARIS design platform: advanced process modelling and administration. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leopold, H., Smirnov, S., Mendling, J.: On the refactoring of activity labels in business process models. Information Systems 37(5), 443–459 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thalheim, B.: Syntax, semantics and pragmatics of conceptual modelling. In: Bouma, G., Ittoo, A., Métais, E., Wortmann, H. (eds.) NLDB 2012. LNCS, vol. 7337, pp. 1–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Dean, D., Lee, J., Orwig, R., Vogel, D.: Technological support for group process modeling. Journal of Management Information Systems, 43–63 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rosemann, M., Muehlen, M.: Evaluation of workflow management systems-a meta model approach. Australian Journal of Information Systems 6, 103–116 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rolland, C.: L’e-lyee: coupling l’ecritoire and lyeeall. Information & Software Technology 44(3), 185–194 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Herwig, S., Lis, Ł., Stein, A.: Formalizing linguistic conventions for conceptual models. In: Laender, A.H.F., Castano, S., Dayal, U., Casati, F., de Oliveira, J.P.M. (eds.) ER 2009. LNCS, vol. 5829, pp. 70–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Becker, J., Kugeler, M., Rosemann, M.: Process management: a guide for the design of business processes. Springer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fahland, D., Favre, C., Jobstmann, B., Koehler, J., Lohmann, N., Völzer, H., Wolf, K.: Instantaneous soundness checking of industrial business process models. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 278–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Aalst, W.M.P., de Beer, H.T., van Dongen, B.F.: Process mining and verification of properties: An approach based on temporal logic. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE 2005, Part I. LNCS, vol. 3760, pp. 130–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Aalst, W.M.P., de Medeiros, A.K.A.: Process mining and security: Detecting anomalous process executions and checking process conformance. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 121, 3–21 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cruse, A.: Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sanderson, M.: Word sense disambiguation and information retrieval. In: ACM SIGIR 1994, pp. 142–151 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stokoe, C., et al.: Word sense disambiguation in information retrieval revisited. In: ACM SIGIR, pp. 159–166 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Resnik, P.: Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. JAIR 11, 95–130 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Recker, J.: Activity Labeling in Process Modeling: Empirical Insights and Recommendations. Inf. Sys. 35(4), 467–482 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, G.: WordNet: a Lexical Database for English. CACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ferret, O.: Testing Semantic Similarity Measures for Extracting Synonyms from a Corpus. In: LREC 2010, pp. 3038–3343. ELRA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: ICML 1998, pp. 296–304. Morgan Kaufmann (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Patwardhan, S., Banerjee, S., Pedersen, T.: Senserelate:targetword: a generalized framework for word sense disambiguation. In: ACL 2005, pp. 73–76 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Keller, G., Teufel, T.: SAP(R) R/3 Process Oriented Implementation: Iterative Process Prototyping. Addison-Wesley (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fahland, D., Favre, C., Koehler, J., Lohmann, N., Völzer, H., Wolf, K.: Analysis on Demand: Instantaneous Soundness Checking of Industrial Business Process Models. Data & Knowledge Engineering 70(5), 448–466 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Hirnschall, A., Verbeek, H.M.W.: An alternative way to analyze workflow graphs. In: Pidduck, A.B., Mylopoulos, J., Woo, C.C., Ozsu, M.T. (eds.) CAiSE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2348, pp. 535–552. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Weber, B., Reichert, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Refactoring large process model repositories. Computers in Industry 62(5), 467–486 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Polyvyanyy, A., García-Bañuelos, L., Dumas, M.: Structuring Acyclic Process Models. In: Hull, R., Mendling, J., Tai, S. (eds.) BPM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6336, pp. 276–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Herwig, S., Lis, L., Stein, A.: Towards Increased Comparability of Conceptual Models - Enforcing Naming Conventions through Domain Thesauri and Linguistic Grammars. In: ECIS 2009, pp. 2231–2242 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Leopold, H., Mendling, J.: Automatic derivation of service candidates from business process model repositories. In: Abramowicz, W., Kriksciuniene, D., Sakalauskas, V. (eds.) BIS 2012. LNBIP, vol. 117, pp. 84–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Knackstedt, R., Kuropka, D., Müller, O.: An ontology-based service discovery approach for the provisioning of product-service bundles. In: ECIS 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Becker, J., Breuker, D., Delfmann, P., Dietrich, H.A., Steinhorst, M.: Identifying business process activity mappings by optimizing behavioral similarity. In: AMCIS 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Leopold, H., Niepert, M., Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Dijkman, R., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Probabilistic optimization of semantic process model matching. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7481, pp. 319–334. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Gacitua-Decar, V., Pahl, C.: Automatic business process pattern matching for enterprise services design. Services II, 111–118 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pittke, F., Leopold, H., Mendling, J. (2013). Spotting Terminology Deficiencies in Process Model Repositories. In: Nurcan, S., et al. Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2013 2013. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 147. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38484-4_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38484-4_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38483-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38484-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics