Multi-perspective Business Process Monitoring

  • Amin Jalali
  • Paul Johannesson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 147)


Monitoring business processes is an important area in Business Process Management. This area not only supports monitoring but also enables flexibility. Thus, it has been investigated in many other areas like Business Activity Monitoring, Exception Handling, Aspect Oriented Business Process Management, etc. These areas require to define how a process instance should be monitored from different perspectives. However, current definitions are coupled to control-flow perspective, which applies some limitations. For example, we cannot define a rule to capture situations in which an account balance is read - regardless of its process.

To capture such situations, we propose an approach to define monitoring rules. This approach enables composition of rules in a way to be decoupled from a specific perspective. To validate the result, we implemented a rule editor and a monitoring service, called Observer Service. These artefacts are used to support the definition of monitoring rules and track process instances, correspondingly. Finally, we investigated the validity and relevancy of the artefacts through a banking case study.


Business Process Management Systems Process Monitoring Service Oriented Architecture flexibility 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Workflow verification: Finding control-flow errors using petri-net-based techniques. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 161–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Adams, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H.: Flexibility as a service. In: Chen, L., Liu, C., Liu, Q., Deng, K. (eds.) DASFAA 2009 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 5667, pp. 319–333. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., et al.: Process mining manifesto. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM 2011 Workshops, Part I. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 169–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Aldred, L., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Design and implementation of the YAWL system. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 142–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Barros, A.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B.: Advanced workflow patterns. In: Scheuermann, P., Etzion, O. (eds.) CoopIS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1901, pp. 18–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Yawl: yet another workflow language. Information Systems 30(4), 245–275 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weijters, A.: Process mining: a research agenda. Computers in Industry 53(3), 231–244 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adams, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Edmond, D.: Dynamic, extensible and context-aware exception handling for workflows. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 95–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adams, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Worklets: A service-oriented implementation of dynamic flexibility in workflows. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4275, pp. 291–308. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Becker, J., Rosemann, M., von Uthmann, C.: Guidelines of business process modeling. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 30–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cappelli, C., Santoro, F.M., do Prado Leite, J.C.S., Batista, T., Medeiros, A.L., Romeiro, C.S.C.: Reflections on the modularity of business process models: The case for introducing the aspect-oriented paradigm. Business Process Management Journal 16(4), 662–687 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Charfi, A., Mezini, M.: Aspect-oriented web service composition with AO4BPEL. In: (LJ) Zhang, L.-J., Jeckle, M. (eds.) ECOWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3250, pp. 168–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Costello, C., Molloy, O.: Building a process performance model for business activity monitoring. In: Information Systems Development, pp. 237–248 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C.: Semantics and analysis of business process models in bpmn. Information and Software Technology 50(12), 1281–1294 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goedertier, S., Vanthienen, J.: Designing compliant business processes with obligations and permissions. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM 2006 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 5–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Managing process variants in the process lifecycle. In: 10th Int’l Conf. on Enterprise Information Systems, ICEIS 2008, pp. 154–161 (June 2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jalali, A., Wohed, P., Ouyang, C.: Aspect oriented business process modelling with precedence. In: Mendling, J., Weidlich, M. (eds.) BPMN 2012. LNBIP, vol. 125, pp. 23–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jalali, A., Wohed, P., Ouyang, C.: Operational semantics of aspects in business process management. In: Herrero, P., Panetto, H., Meersman, R., Dillon, T. (eds.) OTM-WS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7567, pp. 649–653. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kang, J.G., Han, K.H.: A business activity monitoring system supporting real-time business performance management. In: Third International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology, ICCIT 2008, vol. 1, pp. 473–478 (November 2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lanz, A., Weber, B., Reichert, M.: Workflow time patterns for process-aware information systems. In: Bider, I., Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Ukor, R. (eds.) BPMDS 2010 and EMMSAD 2010. LNBIP, vol. 50, pp. 94–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mulyar, N.A., Schonenberg, M.H., Mans, van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Towards a Taxonomy of Process Flexibility (Extended Version). BPM Center Report BPM-07-11. (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pedrinaci, C., Domingue, J., Alves de Medeiros, A.K.: A core ontology for business process analysis. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 49–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rogge-Solti, A., Weske, M.: Enabling probabilistic process monitoring in non-automated environments. In: Bider, I., Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Wrycza, S. (eds.) EMMSAD 2012 and BPMDS 2012. LNBIP, vol. 113, pp. 226–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Russell, N., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Exception handling patterns. Process-Aware Information Systems. Technical report, BPM Center Report BPM-06-04. BPMcenter. org (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Russell, N., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D.: Workflow resource patterns: Identification, representation and tool support. In: Pastor, Ó., Falcão e Cunha, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 216–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sadiq, S., Governatori, G., Namiri, K.: Modeling control objectives for business process compliance. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 149–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    van Dongen, B.F., de Medeiros, A.K.A., Verbeek, H.M.W., Weijters, A.J.M.M.T., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: The proM framework: A new era in process mining tool support. In: Ciardo, G., Darondeau, P. (eds.) ICATPN 2005. LNCS, vol. 3536, pp. 444–454. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weske, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Verbeek, H.M.W.: Advances in business process management. Data and Knowledge Engineering 50(1), 1–8 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wohed, P., Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Andersson, B., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Patterns-based evaluation of open source bpm systems: The cases of jbpm, openwfe, and enhydra shark. Information and Software Technology 51(8), 1187–1216 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amin Jalali
    • 1
  • Paul Johannesson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations