The Empirical Research of the Causality Relationship Between CO2 Emissions Intensity, Energy Consumption Structure, Energy Intensity and Industrial Structure in China

  • Tao Zhao
  • Xiao-song RenEmail author
Conference paper


This paper adopts econometrics methodology to explore the causality relationship among CO2 emissions intensity, energy consumption structure, energy intensity and industrial structure in China, during the time period 1980–2009. Multivariate cointegration and vecm model are applied to explore the long-term equilibrium and short-term fluctuation. Base on the granger causality test results, it concludes that there exist four group unidirectional causality relationships from CO2 emissions intensity to energy consumption structure, CO2 emissions intensity to industrial structure, industrial structure to energy consumption structure and energy intensity to energy consumption structure. In addition, a bidirectional causality relationship running from CO2 emissions intensity to energy intensity is detected.


Carbon dioxide emissions intensity Energy consumption structure Energy intensity Industrial structure Multivariate cointegration Vecm model 


  1. Chang CC, Claudia CSF (2011) Energy conservation and sustainable economic growth: the case of Latin America and the Caribbean. Energy Policy 39(7):4215–4221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng P-Y, Chen S-T, Chen C-C (2012) Energy consumption and economic growth—new evidence from meta-analysis. Energy Policy 44(4):245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ching-Chih C (2010) A multivariate causality test of carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China. Appl Energy 87(11):3533–3537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Emmanouil H, Heracles P, Dias H (2011) CO2 emissions, GDP and energy intensity: A multivariate cointegration and causality analysis for Greece, 1977–2007. Appl Energy 88(4):1377–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feng T, Sun L, Zhang Y (2009) The relationship between energy consumption structure, economic structure and energy intensity in China. Energy Policy 37(12):5475–5483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Halicioglu F (2009) An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37(3):1156–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harry B, Shuddhasattwa R, Ruhul S (2012) Coal consumption, CO2 emission and economic growth in China: empirical evidence and policy responses. Energy Econ 34(2):518–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ilhan O (2010) A literature survey on energy-growth nexus. Energy Policy 38(1):340–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. James AB (2007) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35(10):4772–4778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kankesu J, Reetu V, Ying L (2012) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: a comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy 42(3):450–460Google Scholar
  11. Kojo M, Yemane W (2010) Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa. Energy Econ 32(6):1374–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kraft J, Kraft A (1978) On the relationship between energy and GNP. J Energy Dev 3:401–403Google Scholar
  13. Mohammad LR, Mohammad FA, Malihe A (2010) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuels consumption in Iran. Energy 35(12):5115–5120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ugur S, Ramazan S (2009) Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecol Econ 68(6):1667–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhang X-P, Cheng X-M (2009) Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecol Econ 68(10):2706–2712CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management and EconomicTianjin UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations