Skip to main content

Validating OntoElect Methodology in Refining ICTERI Scope Ontology

  • Conference paper
  • 692 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 137))

Abstract

This research work is focused on the experimental validation of our OntoElect approach to ontology engineering in the case study of iterative refinement of the ICTERI Scope Ontology. OntoElect has been used for evaluating the commitment of the domain knowledge stakeholders to the ontological offering measured as positive and negative votes. The analysis of the measures allowed us answering the questions about the fitness of the ontological offering to the implicit requirements of the stakeholders as well as the completeness of the domain model with respect to their implicit expectations. The paper briefly presents the idea of OntoElect as a socially inspired approach for ontology engineering. It further describes the objectives and the set-up of our evaluation experiment. Finally it presents experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Tatarintseva, O., Ermolayev, V., Fensel, A.: Is Your Ontology a Burden or a Gem? – Towards Xtreme Ontology Engineering. In: Ermolayev, V., et al. (eds.) Proc. 7-th Int. Conf. ICTERI 2011, Kherson, Ukraine, May 4-7. CEUR-WS.org, vol. 716, pp. 65–81 (2011) ISSN 1613-0073

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta, M., Li, R., Yin, Z., Han, J.: Survey on Social Tagging Techniques. SIGKDD Explorations 12(1), 58–72 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Uren, V., Cimiano, P., Iria, J., Handschuh, S., Vargas-Vera, M., Motta, E., Ciravegna, F.: Semantic annotation for knowledge management: Requirements and a survey of the state of the art. Science. Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 4(1), 14–28 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter, J., Khan, I., Gewrber, A.: HarvANA – Harvesting Community Tags to Enrich Collection Metadata. In: Paepcke, A., Borbiha, J., Naaman, M. (eds.) 8th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 147–156. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Siorpaes, K., Hepp, M.: Games with a Purpose for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 23(3), 50–60 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhdanova, A.V.: Community-driven Ontology Construction in Social Networking Portals. Web Intelli. and Agent Sys. 6(1), 93–121 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Von Ahn, L.: Games with a Purpose. Computer 29(6), 92–94 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Law, E., et al.: Tagatune. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Music Information Retrieval, pp. 361–364. Austrian Computer Soc., Ismir (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lieberman, H., Smith, D., Teeters, A.: Common Consensus: A Web-Based Game or Collecting Commonsense Goals. In: Proc. Workshop Common Sense for Intelligent Interfaces, ACM Conf. Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Middleton, J.A., Photini, A.: Spanias: Motivation for Achievement in Mathematics: Findings, Generalizations, and Criticisms of the Research. J. Research in Mathematics Education 30(1), 65–88 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ames, C.: Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. J. Educational Psychology 84, 261–271 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Middleton, J.A.: A study of intrinsic motivation in the mathematics classroom: A personal constructs approach. J. Research in Mathematics Education 26, 254–279 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ermolayev, V., Ruiz, C., Tilly, M., Jentzsch, E., Gomez-Perez, J.M.: A context model for knowledge workers. In: CIAO 2010. CEUR-WS.org, vol. 626 (2010) ISSN 1613-0073

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tatarintseva, O., Borue, Y., Ermolayev, V. (2013). Validating OntoElect Methodology in Refining ICTERI Scope Ontology. In: Mayr, H.C., Kop, C., Liddle, S., Ginige, A. (eds) Information Systems: Methods, Models, and Applications. UNISCON 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 137. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38370-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38370-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38369-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38370-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics