Skip to main content

From Decision to Shared-Decision: Introducing Patients’ Preferences in Clinical Decision Analysis - A Case Study in Thromboembolic Risk Prevention

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7885))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the context of the EU project MobiGuide, the development of a patient-centric decision support system based on clinical guidelines is the main focus. The project is addressed to patients with chronic illnesses, including atrial fibrillation (AF). In this paper we describe a shared-decision model framework to address those situations, described in the guideline, where the lack of hard evidence makes it important for the care provider to share the decision with the patient and/or his relatives. To illustrate this subject we focus on an important subject tackled in the AF guideline: thromboembolic risk prevention. We introduce a utility model and a cost model to collect patient’s preferences. On the basis of these preferences and of literature data, a decision model is implemented to compare different therapeutic options. The development of this framework increases the involvement of patients in the process of care focusing on the centrality of individual subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Llewellyn-Thomas, H.A., Crump, T.: Decision Support for Patients: Values Clarification and Preference Elicitation. Med. Care Res. Rev. (2012) (Epub ahead of print)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hack, T.F., Degner, L.F., Watson, P., Sinha, L.: Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 15(1), 9–19 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinstein, M.C., Fineberg, H.V.: Clinical Decision Analysis. Saunders, Philadelphia (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charles, C., Gafni, A., Whelan, T.: Shared decision- making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? Social Science Medicine 44, 681–692 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stacey, D., Murray, M.A., Légaré, F., Sandy, D., Menard, P., O’Connor, A.: Decision coaching to support shared decision making: A framework, evidence, and implications for nursing practice, education, and policy. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs. 5(1), 25–35 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force: 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation 123(10), e269–e367 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Soares, M.O.: Is the QALY blind, deaf and dumb to equity? NICE’s considerations over equity. Br. Med. Bull. 101, 17–31 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bell, C.M., Chapman, R.H., Stone, P.W., Sandberg, E.A., Neumann, P.J.: An off-the-shelf help list: A comprehensive catalog of preference scores from published cost-utility analyses. Med. Decis. Making 21(4), 288–294 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. CEA Registry website, https://research.tufts-nemc.org/cear4/ (last access March 13, 2013)

  10. Bleichrodt, H., Johannesson, M.: An Experimental Test of a Theoretical Foundation for Rating-scale Valuations. Med. Decis. Making 17, 208–216 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Torrance, G.W., Thomas, W.H., Sackett, D.L.: A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Services Res. 7, 118–133 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic behavior. Princeton University Press (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gerzeli, S., Tarricone, R., Zolo, P., Colangelo, I., Busca, M.R., Gandolfo, C.: The economic burden of stroke in Italy. The EcLIPSE Study: Economic Longitudinal Incidence-based Project for Stroke Evaluation. Neurol. Sci. 26(2), 72–80 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sonnenberg, F.A., Beck, J.R.: Markov models in medical decision making: A practical guide. Med. Decis. Making 13(4), 322–338 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liberato, N.L., Rognoni, C., Marchetti, M., Quaglini, S.: Cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. To appear on: Internal and Emergency Medicine (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lip, G.Y.H.: Stroke in atrial fibrillation: Epidemiology and thromboprophylaxis. J. Thromb Haemost 9 (suppl. 1), 344–351 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sacchi, L., Rognoni, C., Rubrichi, S., Panzarasa, S., Quaglini, S. (2013). From Decision to Shared-Decision: Introducing Patients’ Preferences in Clinical Decision Analysis - A Case Study in Thromboembolic Risk Prevention. In: Peek, N., Marín Morales, R., Peleg, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7885. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38326-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38326-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38325-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38326-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics