Team Performance in Agile Development Teams: Findings from 18 Focus Groups

  • Torgeir Dingsøyr
  • Yngve Lindsjørn
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 149)


How to make teams perform well is increasingly important in software development, as agile development methods prescribe development in small teams. Team performance has been studied in a number of research fields, and there are many models of what enables team performance. A central question then is how relevant these models are for agile development teams. This article investigates the following research question: What factors do agile software practitioners perceive to influence effective teamwork, through a focus group study with 92 participants in 18 groups. The main findings are that what agile practitioners perceive foster and hinder team performance seems to comply well with what is stated in an existing research-based model. However, agile practitioners seem to place insufficient focus on backup behaviour. Agile practitioners place much emphasis on physical and technical infrastructure of the development team as enablers of team performance.


team performance agile software development software engineering software process improvement focus group 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Dingsøyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V., Moe, N.B.: A Decade of Agile Methodologies: Towards Explaining Agile Software Development. Journal of Systems and Software 85, 1213–1221 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dybå, T., Dingsøyr, T.: Empirical Studies of Agile Software Development: A Systematic Review. Information and Software Technology 50, 833–859 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gulliksen Stray, V., Moe, N.B., Dingsøyr, T.: Challenges to Teamwork: A Multiple Case Study of Two Agile Teams. In: Sillitti, A., Hazzan, O., Bache, E., Albaladejo, X. (eds.) XP 2011. LNBIP, vol. 77, pp. 146–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Katzenbach, J.R., Smith, D.K.: The Discipline of Teams. Harvard Business Review 71, 111–120 (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beck, K., Andres, C.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Chage, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Young, S.M., Edwards, H.M., McDonald, S., Thompson, J.B.: Personality Characteristics in an XP Team: A Repertory Grid Study. In: Proceedings of Human and Social Factors of Software Engineering, HSSE, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, pp. 1–7 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seger, T., Hazzan, O., Bar-Nahor, R.: Agile Orientation and Psychological Needs, Self-Efficacy, and Perceived Support: A Two Job-Level Comparison. In: Agile, Toronto, pp. 3–14 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Teh, A., Baniassad, E., van Rooy, D., Boughton, C.: Social Psychology and Software Teams: Establishing Task-Effective Group Norms. IEEE Software 29, 53–58 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Whitworth, E., Biddle, R.: The Social Nature of Agile Teams. In: Agile, Washington, DC, pp. 26–36 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beecham, S., Sharp, H., Baddoo, N., Hall, T., Robinson, H.: Does the XP environment meet the motivational needs of the software developer? An empirical study. In: Agile, Washington, DC, pp. 37–49 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tessem, B., Maurer, F.: Job Satisfaction and Motivation in a Large Agile Team. In: Concas, G., Damiani, E., Scotto, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4536, pp. 54–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Acuña, S.T., Gómez, M., Juristo, N.: Towards understanding the relationship between team climate and software quality—a quasi-experimental study. Empirical Software Engineering 13, 401–434 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stray, V.G., Moe, N.B., Aurum, A.: Investigating Daily Team Meetings in Agile Software Projects. In: Cortellessa, V., Muccini, H., Demirors, O. (eds.) 2012 38th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp. 274–281 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moe, N.B., Aurum, A., Dybå, T.: Challenges of shared decision-making: A multiple case study of agile software development. Information and Software Technology 54, 853–865 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoda, R., Noble, J., Marshall, S.: Developing a grounded theory to explain the practices of self-organizing Agile teams. Empirical Software Engineering 17, 609–639 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moe, N.B., Dingsøyr, T., Dybå, T.: Overcoming Barriers to Self-Management in Software Teams. IEEE Software 26, 20–26 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moe, N.B., Dingsøyr, T., Røyrvik, E.A.: Putting Agile Teamwork to the Test – An Preliminary Instrument for Empirically Assessing and Improving Agile Software Development. In: Abrahamsson, P., Marchesi, M., Maurer, F. (eds.) XP 2009. LNBIP, vol. 31, pp. 114–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kettunen, P., Moilanen, S.: Sensing High-Performing Software Teams: Proposal of an Instrument for Self-monotoring. In: Wohlin, C. (ed.) XP 2012. LNBIP, vol. 111, pp. 77–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moe, N.B., Dingsøyr, T.: Scrum and team effectiveness: Theory and practice. In: 9th International Conference on Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Porgramming, Limerick, Ireland, pp. 11–20 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moe, N.B., Dingsøyr, T., Dybå, T.: A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project. Information and Software Technology 52, 480–491 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    de O. Melo, C., Cruzes, D.S., Kon, F., Conradi, R.: Interpretative case studies on agile team productivity and management. Information and Software Technology 55, 412–427 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dingsøyr, T., Dybå, T.: Team Effectiveness in Software Development: Human and Cooperative Aspects in Team Effectiveness Models and Priorities for Future Studies. In: Workshop on Co-operative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE, Zürich, Switzerland, pp. 27–29 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Salas, E., Stagl, K.C., Burke, C.S., Goodwin, G.F.: Fostering Team Effectiveness in Organizations: Toward an Integrative Theoretical Framework. In: 52nd Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Lincoln, NE, pp. 185–243 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rousseau, V., Aube, C., Savoie, A.: Teamwork behaviors - A review and an integration of frameworks. Small Group Research 37, 540–570 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Salas, E., Sims, D.E., Burke, S.C.: Is there a “Big five” in teamwork? Small Group Research 36, 555–599 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stewart, D.W., Shamdasani, P.N., Rook, D.: Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Sage Publications (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mathieu, J., Maynard, M.T., Rapp, T., Gilson, L.: Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management 34, 410–476 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Torgeir Dingsøyr
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yngve Lindsjørn
    • 3
  1. 1.SINTEFTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Department of Computer and Information ScienceNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyNorway
  3. 3.University of OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations