Storing and Provisioning Linked Data as a Service

  • Johannes Lorey
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7882)

Abstract

Linked Data offers novel opportunities for aggregating information about a wide range of topics and for a multitude of applications. While the technical specifications of Linked Data have been a major research undertaking for the last decade, there is still a lack of real-world data and applications exploiting this data. Partly, this is due to the fact that datasets remain isolated from one another and their integration is a non-trivial task. In this work, we argue for a Data-as-a-Service approach combining both warehousing and query federation to discover and consume Linked Data. We compare our work to state-of-the-art approaches for discovering, integrating, and consuming Linked Data. Moreover, we illustrate a number of challenges when combining warehousing with federation features, and highlight key aspects of our research.

References

  1. 1.
    Abedjan, Z., Lorey, J., Naumann, F.: Reconciling ontologies and the web of data. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), Maui, HI, USA, pp. 1532–1536 (October 2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Betz, H., Gropengießer, F., Hose, K., Sattler, K.U.: Learning from the history of distributed query processing - a heretic view on linked data management. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Consuming Linked Data, COLD (November 2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data - the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5(3), 1–22 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Böhm, C., Lorey, J., Naumann, F.: Creating voiD descriptions for web-scale data. Journal of Web Semantics 9(3), 339–345 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Correndo, G., Salvadores, M., Millard, I., Glaser, H., Shadbolt, N.: SPARQL query rewriting for implementing data integration over linked data. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT), Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 4:1–4:11 (March 2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goasdoué, F., Karanasos, K., Leblay, J., Manolescu, I.: View selection in semantic web databases. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 5(2), 97–108 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Langegger, A., Wöß, W., Blöchl, M.: A semantic web middleware for virtual data integration on the web. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 493–507. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Makris, K., Gioldasis, N., Bikakis, N., Christodoulakis, S.: Ontology mapping and SPARQL rewriting for querying federated RDF data sources. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6427, pp. 1108–1117. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schenk, S., Staab, S.: Networked graphs: a declarative mechanism for SPARQL rules, SPARQL views and RDF data integration on the web. In: Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), New York, NY, USA, pp. 585–594 (April 2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, L., von Laszewski, G., Younge, A., He, X., Kunze, M., Tao, J., Fu, C.: Cloud computing: a perspective study. New Generation Computing 28, 137–146 (2010)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Lorey
    • 1
  1. 1.Hasso Plattner InstitutePotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations