Skip to main content

A Review of Rotator Cuff Classifications in Current Use

Abstract

To better understand the natural history of rotator cuff disease and its treatment, it is crucial to find a reliable method of classifying or describing rotator cuff tears. We can then use this classification to identify appropriate treatments for each type of tear that lead to the best outcomes. There are many rotator cuff classification systems in use today, making it difficult to compare results and to agree on proper treatment. In addition, when using any system, surgeons may not always agree on how a particular tear is classified.

Keywords

  • Rotator Cuff
  • Rotator Cuff Tear
  • Fatty Infiltration
  • Rotator Cuff Repair
  • Tear Tendon

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38097-6_2
  • Chapter length: 9 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-38097-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 2.1
Fig. 2.2
Fig. 2.3
Fig. 2.4

References

  1. Kuhn JE, Dunn WR, Ma B et al (2007) Interobserver agreement in the classification of rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 35:437–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DeOrio JK, Cofield RH (1984) Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:563–567

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellman H (1993) Rotator cuff disorders. In: Ellman H, Gartsman GM (eds) Arthroscopic shoulder surgery and related disorders. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 98–119

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harryman DT, Mack LA, Wang K, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA (1991) Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:982–989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Patte D (1990) Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:81–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolfgang GL (1974) Surgical repairs of tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:14–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lippe J, Spang JT, Leger RR, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD, Shea KP (2012) Inter-rater agreement of the Goutallier, Patte, and Warner classification scores using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rotator cuff tears. Arthrosc: J Arthrosc Relat Surg 28(2)(February):154–159

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ellman H (1990) Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:64–74

    Google Scholar 

  9. Snyder SJ (2003) Arthroscopic classification of rotator cuff lesions and surgical decision making. In: Snyder SJ (ed) Shoulder arthroscopy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 201–207

    Google Scholar 

  10. Habermeyer P, Magosch P, Lichtenberg S (2006) Classifications of rotator cuff. In: Walch G, Boileau P (eds) Classifications and scores of the shoulder. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  11. Habermeyer P, Krieter MC, Tang K-L, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P (2008) A new arthroscopic classification of articular-sided supraspinatus footprint lesions: a prospective comparison with Snyder’s and Ellman’s classification. J Shoulder Elbow Surg (Nov–Dec) 17(6):909–913

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bayne O, Bateman J (1984) Long-term results of surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. In: Bateman JE, Welsh R (eds) Surgery of the shoulder. CV Mosby, Philadelphia, pp 167–171

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davidson J, Burkhart SS (2010) The geometric classification of rotator cuff tears: a system linking tear pattern to treatment and prognosis. Arthroscopy 26:417–424

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Nho SJ, Brown BS, Lyman S, Adler RS, Altchek DW, MacGillivray JD (2009) Prospective analysis of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prognostic factors affecting clinical and ultrasound outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg (Jan–Feb 2009) 18(1):13–20. Epub: 16 Sept 2008

    Google Scholar 

  15. Spencer EE, Dunn WR, Wright RW et al (2008) Interobserver agreement in the classification of rotator cuff tears using magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 36:99–103

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:78–83

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oh JH, Kim SH, Ji HM, Jo KH, Bin SW, Gong HS (2009) Prognostic factors affecting anatomic outcome of rotator cuff repair and correlation with functional outcome. Arthroscopy 25:30–39

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Gladstone JN, Bishop JY, Lo IK, Flatow EL (2007) Fatty infiltration and atrophy of the rotator cuff do not improve after rotator cuff repair and correlate with poor functional outcome. Am J Sports Med 35:719–728

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Melis B, Nemoz C, Walch G (2009) Muscle fatty infiltration in rotator cuff tears: Descriptive analysis of 1688 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:319–324

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber C (1999) Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:599–605

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Warner JJP, Higgins L, Parsons IM IV, Dowdy P (2001) Diagnosis and treatment of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:37–46

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Santoro Belangero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 ISAKOS

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belangero, P.S., Ejnisman, B., Arce, G. (2013). A Review of Rotator Cuff Classifications in Current Use. In: , et al. Shoulder Concepts 2013: Consensus and Concerns. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38097-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38097-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38096-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38097-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)