Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Business ((BRIEFSBUSINESS))

  • 1983 Accesses

Abstract

The form of social transaction relationship is often not the one-time transaction among the behavior subjects, but multiple, long-term transaction based on long-term trust and mutual relationships. This type of marketing consciousness change is also reflected fully in the development of IMC theory, from a simple definition to analysis, the theory definition of the market-oriented, customer-centric concept from the beginning has gradually changed to “company internal and external stakeholders”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alkhafaji AF (1989) A stakeholder approach to corporate governance: managing in a dynamic environment. Quorum Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • American Advertising Agency Association (1989) Association of American Advertising Agencies Marketing Essay. http://www.ukessays.com/essays/marketing/association-of-american-advertising-agencies-marketing-essay.php

  • Barnard CI (1938) The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner SN (1993) The stakeholder theory of the firm and organizational decision making: some propositions and a model. In: Pasquero J, Collins D. (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, San Diego, pp 205– 210

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner SN (1995) Stakeholder theory of the firm: its consistency with current management techniques. In: J. Ndsi (ed) Understanding stakeholder thinking. LSR–Julkaisut Oy, Helsinki, pp 75–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB (1989) Business and society: ethics and stakeholder management. South–Western Publishing Company, Cincinatti

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB(1993) Business and society: ethics and stakeholder management, 2nd edn. South–western publishing, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Charkham J (1994) Keeping good company: a study of corporate governance in five countries. Oxford University, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson MBE (1994) A risk based model of stakeholder theory. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Toronto conference on stakeholder theory, Centre for Corporate Social Performance and Ethics, University of Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson MBE (1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):92–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell B, Shapiro AC (1987) Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Manag 16(1):5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T, Preston L (1995) The stakeholder theory of the company: concepts, evidence and implications. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):65–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan T (1993) To Fathom integrated marketing, dive! Advert Age 64:11

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan WM, Freeman RE (1988) A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism. In: Beauchamp TL, Bowie NE (eds) Ethical Theory and Business, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, pp 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing Inc., Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, RE(1994). The politics of stakeholder theory. Bus Ethics Quart 4(4):409–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE, Evan WM (1990) Corporate Governance: a stakeholder interpretation. J Behav Econ 19(4):337–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE, Gilbert DR (1987) Managing stakeholder interests. In: Sethi SP, Fable CM (eds) Business and society: dimensions of conflict and cooperation. Lexington Books: Lexington, MA, pp 379–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE, Reed DL (1983) Stockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective on corporate governance. Calif Manag Rev 25(3):88–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC (2007) Managing for stakeholders: survival, reputation, and success. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif Manag Rev 33(3):114–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JS, Bosse DA, Phillips RA (2010) Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions and competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 31(1):58–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill CWL, Jones TM (1992) Stakeholder–agency theory. J Manag Stud 29(2):131–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones T (1995) Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad Manag Rev 20(2):404–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Langtry B (1994) Stakeholders and the moral responsibilities of business. Bus Ethics Q 4(4):431–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RK, Bradley RA, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndsi J (1995) What is stakeholder thinking? A snapshot of a social theory of the firm. In: J. Ndsi (ed) Understanding stakeholder thinking. LSR–Julkaisut Oy, Helsinki, pp 19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips R, Freeman RE (2003) Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Post J, Preston L, Sachs S (2002) Redefining the company: stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW (1988) Institutional effects on organizational structure and performance. In Lynne GZ (ed) Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Ballinger, Cambridge, pp 115–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhenman E (1964) Foeretagsdemokrati och foeretagsorganisation. Stockholm, Thule

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage GT, Nix TW, Whitehead CJ, Blair JD (1991) Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Acad Manag Executive 5(2):61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisodia RS, Wolfe DB, Sheth JN (2007) Firms of endearment: how world-class companies profit from passion and purpose. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Standford Memo (1963) Cited in Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston, Pitman

    Google Scholar 

  • Starik M (1994) Essay by Mark Starik. Reflections on stakeholder theory. Bus Soc 33(1):82–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart DW (1996) Market-back approach to the design for integrated communications programs: a paradigm and a focus on determinates of success. J Bus Res 37:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler D, Maria S (1998) Including the stakeholders: the business case. Long Range Plan 31(2):201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicks AC, Freeman RE, Gilbert DR (1994) A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Bus Ethics Q 4(4):475–497

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwang-Yong Shin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shin, KY. (2013). The Object of IMC: Stakeholders. In: The Executor of Integrated Marketing Communications Strategy: Marcom Manager’s Working Model. SpringerBriefs in Business. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38091-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics