User Involvement in Future Internet Projects

  • Anne-Marie Oostveen
  • Eric T. Meyer
  • Brian Pickering
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7858)

Abstract

To determine actual attitudes and practices of those in the Future Internet industry towards user involvement, delegates at the 2012 FIA participated in a focus group and a survey. Continuous user involvement is highly valued and expected to maximise the societal benefits of FI applications. However, just over half of the FI projects apply a user-centred approach, and a large number of survey respondents admitted to being not very knowledgeable about standard user-centred design tools or techniques.

Keywords

Future Internet user involvement user-centred design tools SESERV 

References

  1. 1.
    Oostveen, A., Van den Besselaar, P.: User Involvement in Large-Scale eGovernment Projects: Finding an Effective Combination of Strategies and Methods. In: Folstad, A., Krogstie, J., Oppermann, R., Svanaes, D. (eds.) User Involvement in e-Government development projects, pp. 11–18 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steen, M., Kuijt-Evers, L., Klok, J.: Early user involvement in research and design projects - A review of methods and practices. In: 23rd EGOS Colloquium (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oostveen, A.-M., Hjorth, I., Pickering, B., Boniface, M., Meyer, E.T., Cobo, C., Schroeder, R.: Cross-disciplinary lessons for the future internet. In: Álvarez, F., et al. (eds.) FIA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7281, pp. 42–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    See webcasts Bob Briscoe and Falk von Bornstaedt (2012), http://www.seserv.org/athens-ws-1
  5. 5.
    Astebro, T., Dahlin, K.: Opportunity Knocks. Research Policy 34(9), 1404–1418 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blackman, C., Brown, I., Cave, J., Forge, S., Guevara, K., Srivastava, M., et al.: Towards a Future Internet: Interrelation between Technological, Social and Economic Trends. EC, Brussels (2010), http://www.internetfutures.eu/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/TAFI-Final-Report.pdf Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van den Besselaar, P.: Technology and Democracy, the limits to steering. In: Henderson Chatfield, R., Kuhn, S., Muller, M. (eds.) Broadening Participation -5th PDC, pp. 1–10. CPSR, Seattle (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ehn, P.: Scandinavian design: On participation and skill. In: Schuler, Namioka (eds.) Participatory design: Principles and practices, pp. 41–77. Hillsdale, New Jersey (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., Oliveira, A.: Smart Cities and the Future Internet: Towards Cooperation Frameworks for Open Innovation. In: Domingue, J., et al. (eds.) Future Internet Assembly. LNCS, vol. 6656, pp. 431–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schaffers, H., Sallstrom, A., Pallot, M., Hernandez-Munoz, J., Santoro, R., Trousse, B.: Integrating Living Labs with Future Internet Experimental Platforms for Co-creating Services within Smart Cities. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Authors 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne-Marie Oostveen
    • 1
  • Eric T. Meyer
    • 1
  • Brian Pickering
    • 2
  1. 1.Oxford Internet InstituteUniversity of OxfordUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.IT Innovation CentreUniversity of SouthamptonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations