Skip to main content

Combined Transaction Processing and Reporting Benchmark

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1347 Accesses

Part of the book series: In-Memory Data Management Research ((IMDM))

Abstract

Only limited statements can be made concerning the ability of existing data management systems to handle a mixed OLTP and OLAP workload since they have so far been treated as separate domains and separate benchmarks were created. Existing benchmarks could be applied to a combined architecture for OLTP and OLAP by simply running the benchmarks in parallel. This would only lead to a partial picture of the actual performance of such a system measuring the effects of hardware resource contention as the benchmarks are running on their own distinguished sets of tables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    in period  = i.p.

Bibliography

  1. A. Chmura, J.M. Heumann, Logical Data Modeling: What It Is and How to Do It (Springer, New York, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Frolick, T.R. Ariyachandra, Business performance management: one truth. Inf. Syst. Manag. 23(1), 41–48 (2006). Winter

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Harizopoulos, V. Shkapenyuk, A. Ailamaki, QPipe: a simultaneously pipelined relational query engine, in Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD ’05, Baltimore (ACM, New York, 2005), pp. 383–394

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Johnson, S. Harizopoulos, N. Hardavellas, K. Sabirli, I. Pandis, A. Ailamaki, N.G. Mancheril, B. Falsafi, To share or not to share? in Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB ’07, Vienna (VLDB Endowment, 2007), pp. 351–362

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Krüger, C. Kim, M. Grund, N. Satish, D. Schwalb, J. Chhugani, H. Plattner, P. Dubey, A. Zeier, Fast updates on read-optimized databases using multi-core CPUs. Proc. VLDB Endow. 5(1), 61–72 (2011) VLDB Endowment.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.A. Lang, B. Bhattacharjee, T. Malkemus, S. Padmanabhan, K. Wong, Increasing buffer-locality for multiple relational table scans through grouping and throttling, in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE’07, Istanbul, ed. by R. Chirkova, A. Dogac, M.T. Özsu, T.K. Sellis (IEEE, 2007), pp. 1136–1145

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.R. Lummus, R.J. Vokurka, Defining supply chain management: a historical perspective and practical guidelines. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 99(1), 11–17 (1999). MCB University Press

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Mertens, Integrierte Informationsverarbeitung 1, 17th edn. (Gabler, Wiesbaden, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. MySQL 5.5 Reference Manual, Revision: 26779. Oracle USA, Inc., 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood City, CA 94065, July 2011

    Google Scholar 

  10. Object Management Group (OMG), Business process model and notation (BPMN). Specification, version 2.0, Jan 2011. Retrieved from http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/PDF. Last accessed 15 June 2012

  11. D. Pfaff, B. Skiera, T. Weitzel, Financial-Chain-Management: Ein generisches Modell zur Identifikation von Verbesserungspotenzialen. Wirtschaftsinformatik 46(2), 107–117 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T.K. Sellis, Multiple-query optimization. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 13(1), 23–52 (1988). ACM, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Stewart, Supply chain performance benchmarking study reveals keys to supply chain excellence. Logist. Inf. Manag. 8(2), 38–44 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Zukowski, S. Héman, N. Nes, P. Boncz, Cooperative scans: dynamic bandwidth sharing in a DBMS, in Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB ’07, Vienna, ed. by C. Koch, J. Gehrke, M.N. Garofalakis, D. Srivastava, K. Aberer, A. Deshpande, D. Florescu, C.Y. Chan, V. Ganti, C.-C. Kanne, W. Klas, E.J. Neuhold (VLDB Endowment, 2007), pp. 723–734

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bog, A. (2014). Combined Transaction Processing and Reporting Benchmark. In: Benchmarking Transaction and Analytical Processing Systems. In-Memory Data Management Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38070-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics