Advertisement

Intuitive Systemic Models and Intrinsic Features for Radar-Specific Emitter Identification

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 215)

Abstract

An intuitive systemic model based on the systemic Yoyos and stochastic differential geometry is provided for finding a meaningful geometric description of radar-specific emitter identification (SEI) problems in this paper. According to this model, we show that intrinsic parameters of signals can be used to explain and find the effective fingerprints feature of specific emitters. Experiments on actual intercepted radar signals with the same type verify the correctness and validity of the proposed model.

Keywords

Radar Specific emitter identification Systemic Yoyos Differential geometry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank professor Wenli Jiang, Xiang Wang and Peng Yang for useful discussions regarding this work. We also thank professor Yi Lin for his thesis, and Yifei Li for her comments. We are grateful to the reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

References

  1. 1.
    Wiley RG (2002) ELINT: the interception and analysis of radar signals. Artech House Inc, NorwoodGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spezio AE (2002) Electronic warfare systems. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 50(3):633–644 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goodman G (2009) New horizons for shipboard EW. JED 32(1):25–32Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jackson EA (2006) Detecting intrusions at layer one: device fingerprinting for network access authorization. Ph.D. dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IowaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shieh CS, Lin CT (2002) A vector neural network for emitter identification. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag 50(8):1120–1127Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Langley LE (1993) Specific emitter identification (SEI) and classical parameter fusion technology. In: Proceedings of IEEE Western electronic show conference, San Francisco, CA, pp 377–381Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dagostino S, Foglia G, Pistoia D (2009) Specific emitter identification: Analysis on real radar signal data. In: Proceedings of the 6th European conference on radar, Rome, Italy, pp 242–245Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kawalec A, Owczarek R (2004) Specific emitter identification using intrapulse data. In: Proceedings of the European radar conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 249–252Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin Y (2008) Systemic Yoyos: some impacts of the second dimension. Taylor and Francis, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diego R (2010) Systemic Yoyos: some impacts of the second dimension, Kybernetes. Int J Syst Cybern Manag Sci 39(6):1075–1078Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu D (2008) Research on the mechanism an method on the specific emitter identification. National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin Y, OuYang S (2010) Irregularities and prediction of major disasters. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Song Chunyun S, Zhan Y, Guo L (2010) Specific emitter identification based on intrinsic time-scale decomposition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE wireless communications networking and mobile computing (WiCOM) conference, Chengdu, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lunden J, Koivunen V (2007) Scaled conjugate gradient method for RADAR pulse modulation estimation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE ICASSPGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Darling RWR, Intrinsic location parameter of a diffusion process. http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/tech-reports/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electronic Science and TechnologyNational University of Defense TechnologyChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations