Advertisement

A Collaborative Filtering Recommender Approach by Investigating Interactions of Interest and Trust

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 214)

Abstract

Collaborative filtering-based recommenders operate on the assumption that similar users share similar tastes; however, due to data sparsity of the input ratings matrix, traditional collaborative filtering methods suffer from low accuracy because of the difficulty in finding similar users and the lack of knowledge about the preference of new users. This paper proposes a recommender system based on interest and trust to provide an enhanced recommendations quality. The proposed method incorporates trust derived from both explicit and implicit feedback data to solve the problem of data sparsity. New users can highly benefit from aggregated trust and interest in the form of reputation and popularity of a user as a recommender. The performance is evaluated using two datasets of different sparsity levels, viz. Jester dataset and MovieLens dataset, and are compared with traditional collaborative filtering-based approaches for generating recommendations.

Keywords

Collaborative filtering Data sparsity Cold start Interest and trust 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part by the National Key Technology R&D Program (No. 2012BAH16F02), the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61003254 and No. 60903038), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

References

  1. 1.
    Resnick P, Iacovou N, Suchak M, Bergstrom P, Riedl J (1994) GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In: ACM CSCW’94 conference on computer-supported cooperative work, sharing information and creating meaning, pp 175–186Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breese JS, Heckerman D, Kadie C (1998) Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In: 14th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI’98). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp 43–52Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shardanand U, Maes P (1995) Social information filtering: algorithms for automating word of mouth. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Denver, CO, USA, pp 210–217Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lemire D (2005) Scale and translation in variant collaborative filtering systems. Inf Retr 8(1):129–150MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan J, Riedl J (2001) Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In: 10th international conference on World Wide Web, pp 285–295Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deshpande M, Karypis G (2004) Item-based top-N recommendation algorithms. ACM Trans Inf Syst 22(1):143–177Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Linden G, Smith B, York J (2003) Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Comput 7(1):76–80Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schein AI, Popescul A, Ungar LH (2002) Methods and metrics for cold-start recommendations. In: the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pp 253–260Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Massa P, Avesani P (2004) Trust-aware collaborative filtering for recommender systems. In: International conference on cooperative information systems, Agia Napa, Cyprus, pp 492—508Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim HN, Ji AT, Ha I, Jo GS (2010) Collaborative filtering based on collaborative tagging for enhancing the quality of recommendation. Electron Commerce Res Appl 9(1):73–83Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park YJ, Chang KN (2009) Individual and group behavior-based customer role model for personalized product recommendation. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):1932–1939Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Balabanovic M, Shoham Y (1998) Content-based, collaborative recommendation. Commun ACM 40(3):66–72Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee TQ, Park Y, Park YT (2008) A time-based approach to effective recommender systems using implicit feedback. Expert Syst Appl 34(4):3055–3062Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang CL, Huang WL (2009) Handling sequential pattern decay: developing a two stage collaborative recommendation system. Electron Commerce Res Appl 8(3):117–129Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jeong B, Lee J, Cho H (2009) An iterative semi-explicit rating method for building collaborative recommender systems. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):6181–6186Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee JS, Olafsson S (2009) Two-way cooperative prediction for collaborative filtering recommendations. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):5353–5361Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Donovan J, Smyth B (2005) Trust in recommender systems. In: IUI’05, SanDiego, CA, USA, pp 167–174Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Massa P, Bhattacharjee B (2004) Using trust in recommender systems: an experiment analysis. In: 2nd international conference on trust management, Oxford, England, pp 221–235Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Massa P, Avesani P (2007) Trust-aware recommender systems. In: RecSys. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 17–24Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Massa P, Avesani P (2009) Trust metrics in recommender systems. In: Golbeck J (ed) Computing with social trust. Springer, London, pp 259–285Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yuan W, Guan D, Lee YK, Lee S, Hur SJ (2010) Improved trust-aware recommender system using small-worldness of trust networks. Knowl-Based Syst 23(3):232–238Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bedi P, Sharma R (2012) Trust based recommender system using ant colony for trust computation. Expert Syst Appl 39(1):1183–1190Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Claypool M, Le P, Wased M, Brown D (2001) Implicit interest indicators. In: IUI ’01, pp 33–40Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kuo YL, Yeh CH, Chau R (2003) A validation procedure for fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. In: The 12th IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, vol 2, pp 1080–1085Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim HK, Kim JK, Ryu YU (2009) Personalized recommendation over a customer network for ubiquitous shopping. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 2(2):140–151Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Herlocker J, Konstan J, Borchers A, Riedl J (1999) An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In: Research and development in information retrievalGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lemire D, Maclachlan A (2005) Slope one predictors for online rating-based collaborative filtering. In: SIAM data mining (SDM’05), Newport Beach, CAGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Canny J (2002) Collaborative filtering with privacy via factor analysis. In: the Special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Receiver Operating Characteristic (2012). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Receiver_operating_characteristic

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Computer Science and TechnologyZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.College of InformationZhejiang University of Finance and EconomicsHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations